The use of structural behavioral assessment to develop interventions for secondary students exhibiting challenging behaviors

Mickey Losinski, John W. Maag, Antonis Katsiyannis, Joseph B. Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Structural behavioral assessment (SBA) involves a series of heuristic approaches similar to those used with functional behavioral assessment (FBA). It involves assessing contextual variables that precede the occurrence of a behavior. These variables have also been termed antecedents, setting events, or establishing operations. Once these variables have been assessed, contextually based manipulations are developed and implemented, and interventions are developed from the results to reduce or prevent challenging behaviors from occurring. A major advantage of structural assessment is that teachers may find interventions based on the results easy to implement and relevant to the classroom. However, most of the research on SBA has been conducted with younger children with autism spectrum disorders, intellectual disabilities, and those with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD). Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to extend the research by training a general education teacher to use SBA to develop interventions for secondary students displaying challenging behaviors who are at risk in general education classrooms. An alternating treatments design was used with four at-risk middle school students. Results indicated that a brief SBA can easily be conducted in general education classrooms, and interventions developed from manipulations can not only decrease (a) verbal outbursts (e.g., talking out of turn, arguing, laughing at inappropriate times); (b) inappropriate contact with others (e.g., touching, pushing, hitting, kicking, braiding hair); (c) taking other’s belongings; (d) being out of the student’s assigned seat without permission; and (e) passing notes but also increase writing and eyes on materials or eyes on the teacher during a language arts class. Implications for practice and future research are described.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-174
Number of pages26
JournalEducation and Treatment of Children
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Students
Education
Language Arts
general education
student
Research
Intellectual Disability
Hair
classroom
manipulation
teacher
autism
heuristics
disability
contact
art
event
Therapeutics
language
Autism Spectrum Disorder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The use of structural behavioral assessment to develop interventions for secondary students exhibiting challenging behaviors. / Losinski, Mickey; Maag, John W.; Katsiyannis, Antonis; Ryan, Joseph B.

In: Education and Treatment of Children, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 149-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6af8fd81db19444bad8508a3e8dcb494,
title = "The use of structural behavioral assessment to develop interventions for secondary students exhibiting challenging behaviors",
abstract = "Structural behavioral assessment (SBA) involves a series of heuristic approaches similar to those used with functional behavioral assessment (FBA). It involves assessing contextual variables that precede the occurrence of a behavior. These variables have also been termed antecedents, setting events, or establishing operations. Once these variables have been assessed, contextually based manipulations are developed and implemented, and interventions are developed from the results to reduce or prevent challenging behaviors from occurring. A major advantage of structural assessment is that teachers may find interventions based on the results easy to implement and relevant to the classroom. However, most of the research on SBA has been conducted with younger children with autism spectrum disorders, intellectual disabilities, and those with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD). Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to extend the research by training a general education teacher to use SBA to develop interventions for secondary students displaying challenging behaviors who are at risk in general education classrooms. An alternating treatments design was used with four at-risk middle school students. Results indicated that a brief SBA can easily be conducted in general education classrooms, and interventions developed from manipulations can not only decrease (a) verbal outbursts (e.g., talking out of turn, arguing, laughing at inappropriate times); (b) inappropriate contact with others (e.g., touching, pushing, hitting, kicking, braiding hair); (c) taking other’s belongings; (d) being out of the student’s assigned seat without permission; and (e) passing notes but also increase writing and eyes on materials or eyes on the teacher during a language arts class. Implications for practice and future research are described.",
author = "Mickey Losinski and Maag, {John W.} and Antonis Katsiyannis and Ryan, {Joseph B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/etc.2015.0006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "149--174",
journal = "Education and Treatment of Children",
issn = "0748-8491",
publisher = "West Virginia University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of structural behavioral assessment to develop interventions for secondary students exhibiting challenging behaviors

AU - Losinski, Mickey

AU - Maag, John W.

AU - Katsiyannis, Antonis

AU - Ryan, Joseph B.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Structural behavioral assessment (SBA) involves a series of heuristic approaches similar to those used with functional behavioral assessment (FBA). It involves assessing contextual variables that precede the occurrence of a behavior. These variables have also been termed antecedents, setting events, or establishing operations. Once these variables have been assessed, contextually based manipulations are developed and implemented, and interventions are developed from the results to reduce or prevent challenging behaviors from occurring. A major advantage of structural assessment is that teachers may find interventions based on the results easy to implement and relevant to the classroom. However, most of the research on SBA has been conducted with younger children with autism spectrum disorders, intellectual disabilities, and those with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD). Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to extend the research by training a general education teacher to use SBA to develop interventions for secondary students displaying challenging behaviors who are at risk in general education classrooms. An alternating treatments design was used with four at-risk middle school students. Results indicated that a brief SBA can easily be conducted in general education classrooms, and interventions developed from manipulations can not only decrease (a) verbal outbursts (e.g., talking out of turn, arguing, laughing at inappropriate times); (b) inappropriate contact with others (e.g., touching, pushing, hitting, kicking, braiding hair); (c) taking other’s belongings; (d) being out of the student’s assigned seat without permission; and (e) passing notes but also increase writing and eyes on materials or eyes on the teacher during a language arts class. Implications for practice and future research are described.

AB - Structural behavioral assessment (SBA) involves a series of heuristic approaches similar to those used with functional behavioral assessment (FBA). It involves assessing contextual variables that precede the occurrence of a behavior. These variables have also been termed antecedents, setting events, or establishing operations. Once these variables have been assessed, contextually based manipulations are developed and implemented, and interventions are developed from the results to reduce or prevent challenging behaviors from occurring. A major advantage of structural assessment is that teachers may find interventions based on the results easy to implement and relevant to the classroom. However, most of the research on SBA has been conducted with younger children with autism spectrum disorders, intellectual disabilities, and those with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD). Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to extend the research by training a general education teacher to use SBA to develop interventions for secondary students displaying challenging behaviors who are at risk in general education classrooms. An alternating treatments design was used with four at-risk middle school students. Results indicated that a brief SBA can easily be conducted in general education classrooms, and interventions developed from manipulations can not only decrease (a) verbal outbursts (e.g., talking out of turn, arguing, laughing at inappropriate times); (b) inappropriate contact with others (e.g., touching, pushing, hitting, kicking, braiding hair); (c) taking other’s belongings; (d) being out of the student’s assigned seat without permission; and (e) passing notes but also increase writing and eyes on materials or eyes on the teacher during a language arts class. Implications for practice and future research are described.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930013282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930013282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/etc.2015.0006

DO - 10.1353/etc.2015.0006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930013282

VL - 38

SP - 149

EP - 174

JO - Education and Treatment of Children

JF - Education and Treatment of Children

SN - 0748-8491

IS - 2

ER -