The use and modification of clinical pathways to achieve specific outcomes in bariatric surgery

Melania Yeats, Sue Wedergren, Nicole Fox, Jon S Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical pathways are promoted for standardizing patient care and decreasing resource use without compromising outcome. Once established, we hypothesized that clinical pathways can then be used to modify patient care to achieve specific goals. Our aim was to evaluate a clinical pathway for the bariatric surgical patient that was initially designed to standardize care and later altered to modify the postoperative course. We retrospectively reviewed 150 consecutive patients undergoing open gastric bypass by a single surgeon. The first 50 patients were managed without a formal pathway, (group I). The next 50 were managed with a pathway that standardized care in order to reduce length of stay (LOS), (group II). For the final 50 patients, the pathway was modified to shorten nasogastric decompression time (group III). Patient information, blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), nasogastric decompression, 30-day complication rates, and early readmissions were reviewed. The groups were similar with respect to gender, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and EBL. Operative time was significantly less in groups II and III compared to group I (82% and 68% vs. 38% <180 minutes, P < 0.05). LOS was shorter in groups II and III compared to group I (62% and 42% vs. 20% with a 4-day LOS, P < 0.05). Duration of nasogastric tube decompression was successfully decreased in group III when compared to groups I and II (76% vs. 14% and 6% 1 day or less, P < 0.05). Complication rates were significantly lower in group III as well (14% vs. 36% and 28%, P < 0.05). Standardizing patient care with a clinical pathway decreases LOS after bariatric surgery. An established clinical pathway can then be used to further modify patient care in order to achieve specific goals, such as shortened time of nasogastric decompression. This goal was accomplished without compromising patient outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-154
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume71
Issue number2
StatePublished - Dec 12 2005

Fingerprint

Critical Pathways
Bariatric Surgery
Length of Stay
Decompression
Patient Care
Operative Time
Bariatrics
Gastric Bypass
Body Mass Index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The use and modification of clinical pathways to achieve specific outcomes in bariatric surgery. / Yeats, Melania; Wedergren, Sue; Fox, Nicole; Thompson, Jon S.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 71, No. 2, 12.12.2005, p. 152-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yeats, Melania ; Wedergren, Sue ; Fox, Nicole ; Thompson, Jon S. / The use and modification of clinical pathways to achieve specific outcomes in bariatric surgery. In: American Surgeon. 2005 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 152-154.
@article{4caa24fbe18745d1a5acb561f3d92b9f,
title = "The use and modification of clinical pathways to achieve specific outcomes in bariatric surgery",
abstract = "Clinical pathways are promoted for standardizing patient care and decreasing resource use without compromising outcome. Once established, we hypothesized that clinical pathways can then be used to modify patient care to achieve specific goals. Our aim was to evaluate a clinical pathway for the bariatric surgical patient that was initially designed to standardize care and later altered to modify the postoperative course. We retrospectively reviewed 150 consecutive patients undergoing open gastric bypass by a single surgeon. The first 50 patients were managed without a formal pathway, (group I). The next 50 were managed with a pathway that standardized care in order to reduce length of stay (LOS), (group II). For the final 50 patients, the pathway was modified to shorten nasogastric decompression time (group III). Patient information, blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), nasogastric decompression, 30-day complication rates, and early readmissions were reviewed. The groups were similar with respect to gender, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and EBL. Operative time was significantly less in groups II and III compared to group I (82{\%} and 68{\%} vs. 38{\%} <180 minutes, P < 0.05). LOS was shorter in groups II and III compared to group I (62{\%} and 42{\%} vs. 20{\%} with a 4-day LOS, P < 0.05). Duration of nasogastric tube decompression was successfully decreased in group III when compared to groups I and II (76{\%} vs. 14{\%} and 6{\%} 1 day or less, P < 0.05). Complication rates were significantly lower in group III as well (14{\%} vs. 36{\%} and 28{\%}, P < 0.05). Standardizing patient care with a clinical pathway decreases LOS after bariatric surgery. An established clinical pathway can then be used to further modify patient care in order to achieve specific goals, such as shortened time of nasogastric decompression. This goal was accomplished without compromising patient outcome.",
author = "Melania Yeats and Sue Wedergren and Nicole Fox and Thompson, {Jon S}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "152--154",
journal = "The American surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use and modification of clinical pathways to achieve specific outcomes in bariatric surgery

AU - Yeats, Melania

AU - Wedergren, Sue

AU - Fox, Nicole

AU - Thompson, Jon S

PY - 2005/12/12

Y1 - 2005/12/12

N2 - Clinical pathways are promoted for standardizing patient care and decreasing resource use without compromising outcome. Once established, we hypothesized that clinical pathways can then be used to modify patient care to achieve specific goals. Our aim was to evaluate a clinical pathway for the bariatric surgical patient that was initially designed to standardize care and later altered to modify the postoperative course. We retrospectively reviewed 150 consecutive patients undergoing open gastric bypass by a single surgeon. The first 50 patients were managed without a formal pathway, (group I). The next 50 were managed with a pathway that standardized care in order to reduce length of stay (LOS), (group II). For the final 50 patients, the pathway was modified to shorten nasogastric decompression time (group III). Patient information, blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), nasogastric decompression, 30-day complication rates, and early readmissions were reviewed. The groups were similar with respect to gender, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and EBL. Operative time was significantly less in groups II and III compared to group I (82% and 68% vs. 38% <180 minutes, P < 0.05). LOS was shorter in groups II and III compared to group I (62% and 42% vs. 20% with a 4-day LOS, P < 0.05). Duration of nasogastric tube decompression was successfully decreased in group III when compared to groups I and II (76% vs. 14% and 6% 1 day or less, P < 0.05). Complication rates were significantly lower in group III as well (14% vs. 36% and 28%, P < 0.05). Standardizing patient care with a clinical pathway decreases LOS after bariatric surgery. An established clinical pathway can then be used to further modify patient care in order to achieve specific goals, such as shortened time of nasogastric decompression. This goal was accomplished without compromising patient outcome.

AB - Clinical pathways are promoted for standardizing patient care and decreasing resource use without compromising outcome. Once established, we hypothesized that clinical pathways can then be used to modify patient care to achieve specific goals. Our aim was to evaluate a clinical pathway for the bariatric surgical patient that was initially designed to standardize care and later altered to modify the postoperative course. We retrospectively reviewed 150 consecutive patients undergoing open gastric bypass by a single surgeon. The first 50 patients were managed without a formal pathway, (group I). The next 50 were managed with a pathway that standardized care in order to reduce length of stay (LOS), (group II). For the final 50 patients, the pathway was modified to shorten nasogastric decompression time (group III). Patient information, blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), nasogastric decompression, 30-day complication rates, and early readmissions were reviewed. The groups were similar with respect to gender, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and EBL. Operative time was significantly less in groups II and III compared to group I (82% and 68% vs. 38% <180 minutes, P < 0.05). LOS was shorter in groups II and III compared to group I (62% and 42% vs. 20% with a 4-day LOS, P < 0.05). Duration of nasogastric tube decompression was successfully decreased in group III when compared to groups I and II (76% vs. 14% and 6% 1 day or less, P < 0.05). Complication rates were significantly lower in group III as well (14% vs. 36% and 28%, P < 0.05). Standardizing patient care with a clinical pathway decreases LOS after bariatric surgery. An established clinical pathway can then be used to further modify patient care in order to achieve specific goals, such as shortened time of nasogastric decompression. This goal was accomplished without compromising patient outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22844431536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22844431536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16022015

AN - SCOPUS:22844431536

VL - 71

SP - 152

EP - 154

JO - The American surgeon

JF - The American surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 2

ER -