The Uriscreen test was not better than standard urinalysis and dipstick tests for detecting urinary tract infection in children

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalEvidence-Based Medicine
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Urinalysis
Urinary Tract Infections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{aaf3208fea484bddb575cfa9f393265f,
title = "The Uriscreen test was not better than standard urinalysis and dipstick tests for detecting urinary tract infection in children",
author = "Wigton, {Robert Swift}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/ebm.5.4.126",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Evidence-Based Medicine",
issn = "1356-5524",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Uriscreen test was not better than standard urinalysis and dipstick tests for detecting urinary tract infection in children

AU - Wigton, Robert Swift

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033841857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033841857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebm.5.4.126

DO - 10.1136/ebm.5.4.126

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:0033841857

VL - 5

JO - Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - Evidence-Based Medicine

SN - 1356-5524

IS - 4

ER -