The ups and downs of peer review

Dale J. Benos, Edlira Bashari, Jose M. Chaves, Amit Gaggar, Niren Kapoor, Martin LaFrance, Robert Mans, David Mayhew, Sara McGowan, Abigail Polter, Yawar Qadri, Shanta Sarfare, Kevin Schultz, Ryan C Splittgerber, Jason Stephenson, Cristy Tower, R. Grace Walton, Alexander Zotov

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

131 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-152
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Hope
Accreditation
Publications
History
Education

Keywords

  • Blinding
  • Publication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Benos, D. J., Bashari, E., Chaves, J. M., Gaggar, A., Kapoor, N., LaFrance, M., ... Zotov, A. (2007). The ups and downs of peer review. American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 31(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00104.2006

The ups and downs of peer review. / Benos, Dale J.; Bashari, Edlira; Chaves, Jose M.; Gaggar, Amit; Kapoor, Niren; LaFrance, Martin; Mans, Robert; Mayhew, David; McGowan, Sara; Polter, Abigail; Qadri, Yawar; Sarfare, Shanta; Schultz, Kevin; Splittgerber, Ryan C; Stephenson, Jason; Tower, Cristy; Walton, R. Grace; Zotov, Alexander.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.01.2007, p. 145-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Benos, DJ, Bashari, E, Chaves, JM, Gaggar, A, Kapoor, N, LaFrance, M, Mans, R, Mayhew, D, McGowan, S, Polter, A, Qadri, Y, Sarfare, S, Schultz, K, Splittgerber, RC, Stephenson, J, Tower, C, Walton, RG & Zotov, A 2007, 'The ups and downs of peer review', American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00104.2006
Benos DJ, Bashari E, Chaves JM, Gaggar A, Kapoor N, LaFrance M et al. The ups and downs of peer review. American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education. 2007 Jan 1;31(2):145-152. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00104.2006
Benos, Dale J. ; Bashari, Edlira ; Chaves, Jose M. ; Gaggar, Amit ; Kapoor, Niren ; LaFrance, Martin ; Mans, Robert ; Mayhew, David ; McGowan, Sara ; Polter, Abigail ; Qadri, Yawar ; Sarfare, Shanta ; Schultz, Kevin ; Splittgerber, Ryan C ; Stephenson, Jason ; Tower, Cristy ; Walton, R. Grace ; Zotov, Alexander. / The ups and downs of peer review. In: American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education. 2007 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 145-152.
@article{fa170a2e99c64f2f86575ed339f03f2a,
title = "The ups and downs of peer review",
abstract = "This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.",
keywords = "Blinding, Publication",
author = "Benos, {Dale J.} and Edlira Bashari and Chaves, {Jose M.} and Amit Gaggar and Niren Kapoor and Martin LaFrance and Robert Mans and David Mayhew and Sara McGowan and Abigail Polter and Yawar Qadri and Shanta Sarfare and Kevin Schultz and Splittgerber, {Ryan C} and Jason Stephenson and Cristy Tower and Walton, {R. Grace} and Alexander Zotov",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/advan.00104.2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "145--152",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education",
issn = "1043-4046",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ups and downs of peer review

AU - Benos, Dale J.

AU - Bashari, Edlira

AU - Chaves, Jose M.

AU - Gaggar, Amit

AU - Kapoor, Niren

AU - LaFrance, Martin

AU - Mans, Robert

AU - Mayhew, David

AU - McGowan, Sara

AU - Polter, Abigail

AU - Qadri, Yawar

AU - Sarfare, Shanta

AU - Schultz, Kevin

AU - Splittgerber, Ryan C

AU - Stephenson, Jason

AU - Tower, Cristy

AU - Walton, R. Grace

AU - Zotov, Alexander

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.

AB - This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.

KW - Blinding

KW - Publication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250374457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250374457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/advan.00104.2006

DO - 10.1152/advan.00104.2006

M3 - Review article

VL - 31

SP - 145

EP - 152

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

SN - 1043-4046

IS - 2

ER -