The total effects of boot camps that house juveniles: A systematic review of the evidence

Benjamin Meade, Benjamin Steiner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Boot camp programs were first introduced in the 1980s, became increasingly popular as a correctional sanction, and were widely adopted and implemented throughout the United States. This study involved an examination of the prevalence of state run boot camps for juvenile delinquents and a systematic review of the existing evaluations of boot camp programs that house juveniles. In addition to the effects of boot camps on recidivism, within program effects on participants' attitudes and perceptions of boot camp, and jurisdiction-level effects on bed space were examined. Findings revealed that boot camps are less prevalent than they were in the 1990s. Boot camps, by themselves, typically do not have an effect on participants' odds of recidivism. Boot camps do seem to improve individuals' attitudes and other behaviors within programs. Boot camps also appear to reduce the number of confinement beds jurisdictions require, often resulting in cost savings. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for research and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)841-853
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

Cost Savings
evidence
jurisdiction
Research
sanction
savings
examination
costs
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

The total effects of boot camps that house juveniles : A systematic review of the evidence. / Meade, Benjamin; Steiner, Benjamin.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 38, No. 5, 01.09.2010, p. 841-853.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{53529b9409404f38a6191af8fb902e03,
title = "The total effects of boot camps that house juveniles: A systematic review of the evidence",
abstract = "Boot camp programs were first introduced in the 1980s, became increasingly popular as a correctional sanction, and were widely adopted and implemented throughout the United States. This study involved an examination of the prevalence of state run boot camps for juvenile delinquents and a systematic review of the existing evaluations of boot camp programs that house juveniles. In addition to the effects of boot camps on recidivism, within program effects on participants' attitudes and perceptions of boot camp, and jurisdiction-level effects on bed space were examined. Findings revealed that boot camps are less prevalent than they were in the 1990s. Boot camps, by themselves, typically do not have an effect on participants' odds of recidivism. Boot camps do seem to improve individuals' attitudes and other behaviors within programs. Boot camps also appear to reduce the number of confinement beds jurisdictions require, often resulting in cost savings. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for research and practice.",
author = "Benjamin Meade and Benjamin Steiner",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "841--853",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The total effects of boot camps that house juveniles

T2 - A systematic review of the evidence

AU - Meade, Benjamin

AU - Steiner, Benjamin

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Boot camp programs were first introduced in the 1980s, became increasingly popular as a correctional sanction, and were widely adopted and implemented throughout the United States. This study involved an examination of the prevalence of state run boot camps for juvenile delinquents and a systematic review of the existing evaluations of boot camp programs that house juveniles. In addition to the effects of boot camps on recidivism, within program effects on participants' attitudes and perceptions of boot camp, and jurisdiction-level effects on bed space were examined. Findings revealed that boot camps are less prevalent than they were in the 1990s. Boot camps, by themselves, typically do not have an effect on participants' odds of recidivism. Boot camps do seem to improve individuals' attitudes and other behaviors within programs. Boot camps also appear to reduce the number of confinement beds jurisdictions require, often resulting in cost savings. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for research and practice.

AB - Boot camp programs were first introduced in the 1980s, became increasingly popular as a correctional sanction, and were widely adopted and implemented throughout the United States. This study involved an examination of the prevalence of state run boot camps for juvenile delinquents and a systematic review of the existing evaluations of boot camp programs that house juveniles. In addition to the effects of boot camps on recidivism, within program effects on participants' attitudes and perceptions of boot camp, and jurisdiction-level effects on bed space were examined. Findings revealed that boot camps are less prevalent than they were in the 1990s. Boot camps, by themselves, typically do not have an effect on participants' odds of recidivism. Boot camps do seem to improve individuals' attitudes and other behaviors within programs. Boot camps also appear to reduce the number of confinement beds jurisdictions require, often resulting in cost savings. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for research and practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957018569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957018569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.007

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:77957018569

VL - 38

SP - 841

EP - 853

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

IS - 5

ER -