The time and space of lexicality

A neuromagnetic view

Tony W Wilson, Arthur C. Leuthold, Scott M. Lewis, Apostolos P. Georgopoulos, Patricia J. Pardo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Illuminating the neural mechanisms subserving lexico-semantic processing is requisite to further understanding the neurophysiological basis of the dyslexias. Yet, despite numerous functional neuroimaging experiments, the location and temporal behavior of brain regions mediating word-level language processing remain an area of debate. Such investigations typically utilize the word/pseudoword contrast within hemodynamic measurements, and report several left hemisphere regions that respond more strongly to pseudowords but fail to replicate neural areas unique to real word processing. The present experiment addressed this problem from a different perspective. Mainly, we hypothesized that the time course, but not the neuroanatomy, would show within-subject across-condition disparities. For that purpose, we applied dipole-modeling techniques to high-density magnetoencephalographic recordings of healthy subjects, and utilized excellent spatiotemporal accuracy to demonstrate significant across-condition differences in the time domain, along with indistinguishable neural correlates within-subject. In all participants, both words and pseudowords elicited activity in left perisylvian language areas, with words consistently activating these regions ∼100 ms earlier than pseudowords. Considerable functional heterogeneity was also observed, and this might underlie the inconsistencies among previous studies. We conclude that the neural distinction in word/pseudoword processing is not in spatial localization, but is better conceptualized as a dynamic difference in processing time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume162
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005

Fingerprint

Word Processing
Language
Neuroanatomy
Functional Neuroimaging
Semantics
Healthy Volunteers
Hemodynamics
Brain

Keywords

  • Dyslexia
  • Language
  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG)
  • Perisylvian
  • Word

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Wilson, T. W., Leuthold, A. C., Lewis, S. M., Georgopoulos, A. P., & Pardo, P. J. (2005). The time and space of lexicality: A neuromagnetic view. Experimental Brain Research, 162(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2099-3

The time and space of lexicality : A neuromagnetic view. / Wilson, Tony W; Leuthold, Arthur C.; Lewis, Scott M.; Georgopoulos, Apostolos P.; Pardo, Patricia J.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 162, No. 1, 01.03.2005, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilson, TW, Leuthold, AC, Lewis, SM, Georgopoulos, AP & Pardo, PJ 2005, 'The time and space of lexicality: A neuromagnetic view', Experimental Brain Research, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2099-3
Wilson, Tony W ; Leuthold, Arthur C. ; Lewis, Scott M. ; Georgopoulos, Apostolos P. ; Pardo, Patricia J. / The time and space of lexicality : A neuromagnetic view. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2005 ; Vol. 162, No. 1. pp. 1-13.
@article{9c54846251cf4a5ca68113e76ebf6bd7,
title = "The time and space of lexicality: A neuromagnetic view",
abstract = "Illuminating the neural mechanisms subserving lexico-semantic processing is requisite to further understanding the neurophysiological basis of the dyslexias. Yet, despite numerous functional neuroimaging experiments, the location and temporal behavior of brain regions mediating word-level language processing remain an area of debate. Such investigations typically utilize the word/pseudoword contrast within hemodynamic measurements, and report several left hemisphere regions that respond more strongly to pseudowords but fail to replicate neural areas unique to real word processing. The present experiment addressed this problem from a different perspective. Mainly, we hypothesized that the time course, but not the neuroanatomy, would show within-subject across-condition disparities. For that purpose, we applied dipole-modeling techniques to high-density magnetoencephalographic recordings of healthy subjects, and utilized excellent spatiotemporal accuracy to demonstrate significant across-condition differences in the time domain, along with indistinguishable neural correlates within-subject. In all participants, both words and pseudowords elicited activity in left perisylvian language areas, with words consistently activating these regions ∼100 ms earlier than pseudowords. Considerable functional heterogeneity was also observed, and this might underlie the inconsistencies among previous studies. We conclude that the neural distinction in word/pseudoword processing is not in spatial localization, but is better conceptualized as a dynamic difference in processing time.",
keywords = "Dyslexia, Language, Magnetoencephalography (MEG), Perisylvian, Word",
author = "Wilson, {Tony W} and Leuthold, {Arthur C.} and Lewis, {Scott M.} and Georgopoulos, {Apostolos P.} and Pardo, {Patricia J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-004-2099-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "162",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The time and space of lexicality

T2 - A neuromagnetic view

AU - Wilson, Tony W

AU - Leuthold, Arthur C.

AU - Lewis, Scott M.

AU - Georgopoulos, Apostolos P.

AU - Pardo, Patricia J.

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - Illuminating the neural mechanisms subserving lexico-semantic processing is requisite to further understanding the neurophysiological basis of the dyslexias. Yet, despite numerous functional neuroimaging experiments, the location and temporal behavior of brain regions mediating word-level language processing remain an area of debate. Such investigations typically utilize the word/pseudoword contrast within hemodynamic measurements, and report several left hemisphere regions that respond more strongly to pseudowords but fail to replicate neural areas unique to real word processing. The present experiment addressed this problem from a different perspective. Mainly, we hypothesized that the time course, but not the neuroanatomy, would show within-subject across-condition disparities. For that purpose, we applied dipole-modeling techniques to high-density magnetoencephalographic recordings of healthy subjects, and utilized excellent spatiotemporal accuracy to demonstrate significant across-condition differences in the time domain, along with indistinguishable neural correlates within-subject. In all participants, both words and pseudowords elicited activity in left perisylvian language areas, with words consistently activating these regions ∼100 ms earlier than pseudowords. Considerable functional heterogeneity was also observed, and this might underlie the inconsistencies among previous studies. We conclude that the neural distinction in word/pseudoword processing is not in spatial localization, but is better conceptualized as a dynamic difference in processing time.

AB - Illuminating the neural mechanisms subserving lexico-semantic processing is requisite to further understanding the neurophysiological basis of the dyslexias. Yet, despite numerous functional neuroimaging experiments, the location and temporal behavior of brain regions mediating word-level language processing remain an area of debate. Such investigations typically utilize the word/pseudoword contrast within hemodynamic measurements, and report several left hemisphere regions that respond more strongly to pseudowords but fail to replicate neural areas unique to real word processing. The present experiment addressed this problem from a different perspective. Mainly, we hypothesized that the time course, but not the neuroanatomy, would show within-subject across-condition disparities. For that purpose, we applied dipole-modeling techniques to high-density magnetoencephalographic recordings of healthy subjects, and utilized excellent spatiotemporal accuracy to demonstrate significant across-condition differences in the time domain, along with indistinguishable neural correlates within-subject. In all participants, both words and pseudowords elicited activity in left perisylvian language areas, with words consistently activating these regions ∼100 ms earlier than pseudowords. Considerable functional heterogeneity was also observed, and this might underlie the inconsistencies among previous studies. We conclude that the neural distinction in word/pseudoword processing is not in spatial localization, but is better conceptualized as a dynamic difference in processing time.

KW - Dyslexia

KW - Language

KW - Magnetoencephalography (MEG)

KW - Perisylvian

KW - Word

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16844374047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16844374047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-004-2099-3

DO - 10.1007/s00221-004-2099-3

M3 - Article

VL - 162

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 1

ER -