The TATA-binding protein core domain in solution variably bends TATA sequences via a three-step binding mechanism

Roberto F. Delgadillo, JoDell E. Whittington, Laura K. Parkhurst, Lawrence J Parkhurst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of the binding and bending of the AdMLP TATA sequence (TATAAAAG) by the core domain of yeast TBP allow quantitation of the roles of the N-terminal domains of yeast and human TBP. All three proteins bind DNA via a three-step mechanism with no evidence for an initially bound but unbent DNA. The large enthalpy and entropy of activation for the first step in yTBP binding can now be assigned to movement of the NTD from the DNA binding pocket and not to energetics of DNA bending. The energetic patterns for hTBP and cTBP suggest that the 158-amino acid NTD in hTBP does not initially occupy the DNA binding pocket. Despite the appearance of similar energetics for hTBP and cTBP, order of magnitude differences in rate constants lead to differing populations of intermediates during DNA binding. We find that the NTDs destabilize the three bound forms of DNA for both yTBP and hTBP. For all three proteins, the DNA bend angle (θ) depends on the TATA sequence, with θ for cTBP and hTBP being greater than that for yTBP. For all three proteins, θ for the G6 variant (TATAAGAG) varies with temperature and increases in the presence of osmolyte to be similar to that of AdMLP. Crystallographic studies of cTBP binding to a number of variants had shown no dependence of DNA bending on sequence. The results reported here reveal a clear structural difference for the bound DNA in solution versus the crystal; we attribute the difference to the presence of osmolytes in the crystals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1801-1809
Number of pages9
JournalBiochemistry
Volume48
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 3 2009

Fingerprint

TATA-Box Binding Protein
DNA
Yeast
Yeasts
Protein Domains
Crystals
Proteins
Entropy
Enthalpy
Rate constants
Chemical activation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry

Cite this

The TATA-binding protein core domain in solution variably bends TATA sequences via a three-step binding mechanism. / Delgadillo, Roberto F.; Whittington, JoDell E.; Parkhurst, Laura K.; Parkhurst, Lawrence J.

In: Biochemistry, Vol. 48, No. 8, 03.03.2009, p. 1801-1809.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Delgadillo, Roberto F. ; Whittington, JoDell E. ; Parkhurst, Laura K. ; Parkhurst, Lawrence J. / The TATA-binding protein core domain in solution variably bends TATA sequences via a three-step binding mechanism. In: Biochemistry. 2009 ; Vol. 48, No. 8. pp. 1801-1809.
@article{dc8b068581134a168f601847802fc4e5,
title = "The TATA-binding protein core domain in solution variably bends TATA sequences via a three-step binding mechanism",
abstract = "Studies of the binding and bending of the AdMLP TATA sequence (TATAAAAG) by the core domain of yeast TBP allow quantitation of the roles of the N-terminal domains of yeast and human TBP. All three proteins bind DNA via a three-step mechanism with no evidence for an initially bound but unbent DNA. The large enthalpy and entropy of activation for the first step in yTBP binding can now be assigned to movement of the NTD from the DNA binding pocket and not to energetics of DNA bending. The energetic patterns for hTBP and cTBP suggest that the 158-amino acid NTD in hTBP does not initially occupy the DNA binding pocket. Despite the appearance of similar energetics for hTBP and cTBP, order of magnitude differences in rate constants lead to differing populations of intermediates during DNA binding. We find that the NTDs destabilize the three bound forms of DNA for both yTBP and hTBP. For all three proteins, the DNA bend angle (θ) depends on the TATA sequence, with θ for cTBP and hTBP being greater than that for yTBP. For all three proteins, θ for the G6 variant (TATAAGAG) varies with temperature and increases in the presence of osmolyte to be similar to that of AdMLP. Crystallographic studies of cTBP binding to a number of variants had shown no dependence of DNA bending on sequence. The results reported here reveal a clear structural difference for the bound DNA in solution versus the crystal; we attribute the difference to the presence of osmolytes in the crystals.",
author = "Delgadillo, {Roberto F.} and Whittington, {JoDell E.} and Parkhurst, {Laura K.} and Parkhurst, {Lawrence J}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1021/bi8018724",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1801--1809",
journal = "Biochemistry",
issn = "0006-2960",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The TATA-binding protein core domain in solution variably bends TATA sequences via a three-step binding mechanism

AU - Delgadillo, Roberto F.

AU - Whittington, JoDell E.

AU - Parkhurst, Laura K.

AU - Parkhurst, Lawrence J

PY - 2009/3/3

Y1 - 2009/3/3

N2 - Studies of the binding and bending of the AdMLP TATA sequence (TATAAAAG) by the core domain of yeast TBP allow quantitation of the roles of the N-terminal domains of yeast and human TBP. All three proteins bind DNA via a three-step mechanism with no evidence for an initially bound but unbent DNA. The large enthalpy and entropy of activation for the first step in yTBP binding can now be assigned to movement of the NTD from the DNA binding pocket and not to energetics of DNA bending. The energetic patterns for hTBP and cTBP suggest that the 158-amino acid NTD in hTBP does not initially occupy the DNA binding pocket. Despite the appearance of similar energetics for hTBP and cTBP, order of magnitude differences in rate constants lead to differing populations of intermediates during DNA binding. We find that the NTDs destabilize the three bound forms of DNA for both yTBP and hTBP. For all three proteins, the DNA bend angle (θ) depends on the TATA sequence, with θ for cTBP and hTBP being greater than that for yTBP. For all three proteins, θ for the G6 variant (TATAAGAG) varies with temperature and increases in the presence of osmolyte to be similar to that of AdMLP. Crystallographic studies of cTBP binding to a number of variants had shown no dependence of DNA bending on sequence. The results reported here reveal a clear structural difference for the bound DNA in solution versus the crystal; we attribute the difference to the presence of osmolytes in the crystals.

AB - Studies of the binding and bending of the AdMLP TATA sequence (TATAAAAG) by the core domain of yeast TBP allow quantitation of the roles of the N-terminal domains of yeast and human TBP. All three proteins bind DNA via a three-step mechanism with no evidence for an initially bound but unbent DNA. The large enthalpy and entropy of activation for the first step in yTBP binding can now be assigned to movement of the NTD from the DNA binding pocket and not to energetics of DNA bending. The energetic patterns for hTBP and cTBP suggest that the 158-amino acid NTD in hTBP does not initially occupy the DNA binding pocket. Despite the appearance of similar energetics for hTBP and cTBP, order of magnitude differences in rate constants lead to differing populations of intermediates during DNA binding. We find that the NTDs destabilize the three bound forms of DNA for both yTBP and hTBP. For all three proteins, the DNA bend angle (θ) depends on the TATA sequence, with θ for cTBP and hTBP being greater than that for yTBP. For all three proteins, θ for the G6 variant (TATAAGAG) varies with temperature and increases in the presence of osmolyte to be similar to that of AdMLP. Crystallographic studies of cTBP binding to a number of variants had shown no dependence of DNA bending on sequence. The results reported here reveal a clear structural difference for the bound DNA in solution versus the crystal; we attribute the difference to the presence of osmolytes in the crystals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64349107263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64349107263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/bi8018724

DO - 10.1021/bi8018724

M3 - Article

C2 - 19199812

AN - SCOPUS:64349107263

VL - 48

SP - 1801

EP - 1809

JO - Biochemistry

JF - Biochemistry

SN - 0006-2960

IS - 8

ER -