The Sell decision: Implications for psychological assessment and treatment

Richard H. Hunter, A. Jocelyn Ritchie, William D. Spaulding

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article describes 2 important practice considerations affirmed in the U.S. Supreme Court's Sell v. United States (2002) decision: (a) the importance of providing least restrictive services prior to interventions that violate patients' liberty interests, and (b) contextual and environmental factors may be considered in clinical determinations of dangerousness. The psychological treatment of behavior disorders fall within the purview of least restrictive or intrusive interventions compared with the involuntary administration of psychoactive medications. To legitimately comply with the least restrictive criterion, the provision of psychological services is essential. This long-held criterion is rarely acknowledged today as providers use restricted service arrays and attempt to resolve complex and co-occurring behavior problems with medications and restraints. Less restrictive psychological interventions are required for effective treatment of challenging behaviors. A 2nd significant implication lies in the court's affirmation that it is legitimate to consider contextual factors such as history and current environmental conditions in determining dangerousness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)467-475
Number of pages9
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2005

Fingerprint

Dangerous Behavior
Psychology
Mental Disorders
Therapeutics
History
Problem Behavior

Keywords

  • Functional behavior analysis
  • Involuntary treatment
  • Least restrictive treatment
  • Psychotropic drugs
  • U.S. Supreme Court

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The Sell decision : Implications for psychological assessment and treatment. / Hunter, Richard H.; Ritchie, A. Jocelyn; Spaulding, William D.

In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 36, No. 5, 01.10.2005, p. 467-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e51efd4e98824a60874e6d5e9394f113,
title = "The Sell decision: Implications for psychological assessment and treatment",
abstract = "This article describes 2 important practice considerations affirmed in the U.S. Supreme Court's Sell v. United States (2002) decision: (a) the importance of providing least restrictive services prior to interventions that violate patients' liberty interests, and (b) contextual and environmental factors may be considered in clinical determinations of dangerousness. The psychological treatment of behavior disorders fall within the purview of least restrictive or intrusive interventions compared with the involuntary administration of psychoactive medications. To legitimately comply with the least restrictive criterion, the provision of psychological services is essential. This long-held criterion is rarely acknowledged today as providers use restricted service arrays and attempt to resolve complex and co-occurring behavior problems with medications and restraints. Less restrictive psychological interventions are required for effective treatment of challenging behaviors. A 2nd significant implication lies in the court's affirmation that it is legitimate to consider contextual factors such as history and current environmental conditions in determining dangerousness.",
keywords = "Functional behavior analysis, Involuntary treatment, Least restrictive treatment, Psychotropic drugs, U.S. Supreme Court",
author = "Hunter, {Richard H.} and Ritchie, {A. Jocelyn} and Spaulding, {William D.}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0735-7028.36.5.467",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "467--475",
journal = "Professional Psychology: Research and Practice",
issn = "0735-7028",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Sell decision

T2 - Implications for psychological assessment and treatment

AU - Hunter, Richard H.

AU - Ritchie, A. Jocelyn

AU - Spaulding, William D.

PY - 2005/10/1

Y1 - 2005/10/1

N2 - This article describes 2 important practice considerations affirmed in the U.S. Supreme Court's Sell v. United States (2002) decision: (a) the importance of providing least restrictive services prior to interventions that violate patients' liberty interests, and (b) contextual and environmental factors may be considered in clinical determinations of dangerousness. The psychological treatment of behavior disorders fall within the purview of least restrictive or intrusive interventions compared with the involuntary administration of psychoactive medications. To legitimately comply with the least restrictive criterion, the provision of psychological services is essential. This long-held criterion is rarely acknowledged today as providers use restricted service arrays and attempt to resolve complex and co-occurring behavior problems with medications and restraints. Less restrictive psychological interventions are required for effective treatment of challenging behaviors. A 2nd significant implication lies in the court's affirmation that it is legitimate to consider contextual factors such as history and current environmental conditions in determining dangerousness.

AB - This article describes 2 important practice considerations affirmed in the U.S. Supreme Court's Sell v. United States (2002) decision: (a) the importance of providing least restrictive services prior to interventions that violate patients' liberty interests, and (b) contextual and environmental factors may be considered in clinical determinations of dangerousness. The psychological treatment of behavior disorders fall within the purview of least restrictive or intrusive interventions compared with the involuntary administration of psychoactive medications. To legitimately comply with the least restrictive criterion, the provision of psychological services is essential. This long-held criterion is rarely acknowledged today as providers use restricted service arrays and attempt to resolve complex and co-occurring behavior problems with medications and restraints. Less restrictive psychological interventions are required for effective treatment of challenging behaviors. A 2nd significant implication lies in the court's affirmation that it is legitimate to consider contextual factors such as history and current environmental conditions in determining dangerousness.

KW - Functional behavior analysis

KW - Involuntary treatment

KW - Least restrictive treatment

KW - Psychotropic drugs

KW - U.S. Supreme Court

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27844552277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27844552277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0735-7028.36.5.467

DO - 10.1037/0735-7028.36.5.467

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:27844552277

VL - 36

SP - 467

EP - 475

JO - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

JF - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

SN - 0735-7028

IS - 5

ER -