The scale for assessing emotional disturbance

Test-retest and interrater reliability

Michael H Epstein, Douglas Cullinan, Mark K. Harniss, Gail Ryser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three studies are reported addressing the reliability of the Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (Epstein & Cullinan, 1998), a standardized, norm-referenced measure linked to the federal definition of emotional disturbance (ED). The first and second studies investigated test-retest reliability over a 2-week period to determine the stability of the measure over time. The third study investigated interrater reliability between six pairs of teachers who had worked with a student for 2 or more months to determine the consistency with which the measure can be used by different individuals. In each study, samples were drawn from populations of students identified as having ED. Test-retest reliability coefficients were above .80, the standard recommended for screening tests that will be reported individually. Interrater reliability coefficients were at least .79 for all subscales except Unhappiness or Depression and Physical Symptoms or Fears. Implications for use of the SAED are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-230
Number of pages9
JournalBehavioral Disorders
Volume24
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1 1999

Fingerprint

Affective Symptoms
Reproducibility of Results
Students
Fear
Depression
Population
student
anxiety
teacher

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Epstein, M. H., Cullinan, D., Harniss, M. K., & Ryser, G. (1999). The scale for assessing emotional disturbance: Test-retest and interrater reliability. Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 222-230.

The scale for assessing emotional disturbance : Test-retest and interrater reliability. / Epstein, Michael H; Cullinan, Douglas; Harniss, Mark K.; Ryser, Gail.

In: Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.05.1999, p. 222-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Epstein, MH, Cullinan, D, Harniss, MK & Ryser, G 1999, 'The scale for assessing emotional disturbance: Test-retest and interrater reliability', Behavioral Disorders, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 222-230.
Epstein MH, Cullinan D, Harniss MK, Ryser G. The scale for assessing emotional disturbance: Test-retest and interrater reliability. Behavioral Disorders. 1999 May 1;24(3):222-230.
Epstein, Michael H ; Cullinan, Douglas ; Harniss, Mark K. ; Ryser, Gail. / The scale for assessing emotional disturbance : Test-retest and interrater reliability. In: Behavioral Disorders. 1999 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 222-230.
@article{dae293fc31f347d081103ef19a357c33,
title = "The scale for assessing emotional disturbance: Test-retest and interrater reliability",
abstract = "Three studies are reported addressing the reliability of the Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (Epstein & Cullinan, 1998), a standardized, norm-referenced measure linked to the federal definition of emotional disturbance (ED). The first and second studies investigated test-retest reliability over a 2-week period to determine the stability of the measure over time. The third study investigated interrater reliability between six pairs of teachers who had worked with a student for 2 or more months to determine the consistency with which the measure can be used by different individuals. In each study, samples were drawn from populations of students identified as having ED. Test-retest reliability coefficients were above .80, the standard recommended for screening tests that will be reported individually. Interrater reliability coefficients were at least .79 for all subscales except Unhappiness or Depression and Physical Symptoms or Fears. Implications for use of the SAED are discussed.",
author = "Epstein, {Michael H} and Douglas Cullinan and Harniss, {Mark K.} and Gail Ryser",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "222--230",
journal = "Behavioral Disorders",
issn = "0198-7429",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scale for assessing emotional disturbance

T2 - Test-retest and interrater reliability

AU - Epstein, Michael H

AU - Cullinan, Douglas

AU - Harniss, Mark K.

AU - Ryser, Gail

PY - 1999/5/1

Y1 - 1999/5/1

N2 - Three studies are reported addressing the reliability of the Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (Epstein & Cullinan, 1998), a standardized, norm-referenced measure linked to the federal definition of emotional disturbance (ED). The first and second studies investigated test-retest reliability over a 2-week period to determine the stability of the measure over time. The third study investigated interrater reliability between six pairs of teachers who had worked with a student for 2 or more months to determine the consistency with which the measure can be used by different individuals. In each study, samples were drawn from populations of students identified as having ED. Test-retest reliability coefficients were above .80, the standard recommended for screening tests that will be reported individually. Interrater reliability coefficients were at least .79 for all subscales except Unhappiness or Depression and Physical Symptoms or Fears. Implications for use of the SAED are discussed.

AB - Three studies are reported addressing the reliability of the Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (Epstein & Cullinan, 1998), a standardized, norm-referenced measure linked to the federal definition of emotional disturbance (ED). The first and second studies investigated test-retest reliability over a 2-week period to determine the stability of the measure over time. The third study investigated interrater reliability between six pairs of teachers who had worked with a student for 2 or more months to determine the consistency with which the measure can be used by different individuals. In each study, samples were drawn from populations of students identified as having ED. Test-retest reliability coefficients were above .80, the standard recommended for screening tests that will be reported individually. Interrater reliability coefficients were at least .79 for all subscales except Unhappiness or Depression and Physical Symptoms or Fears. Implications for use of the SAED are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033464050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033464050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 222

EP - 230

JO - Behavioral Disorders

JF - Behavioral Disorders

SN - 0198-7429

IS - 3

ER -