The scale for assessing emotional disturbance: Concurrent validity

Douglas Cullinan, Mark Harniss, Michael H. Epstein, Gail Ryser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (SAED) is a standardized, normreferenced measure designed to operationalize the federal definition of Emotional Disturbance. It has demonstrated content validity and reliability. The two studies reported here address the SAED's concurrent validity. Samples in each study consisted of students identified with Emotional Disturbance. In both studies, special education teachers rated students on the SAED and a second measure of children 's emotional and behavior problems. In the first study the SAED was compared to the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Correlations were generally moderate to high for similar subscales and low for dissimilar subscales. In the second study, the SAED was compared to the Teacher Report Form. Again, correlations generally were as expected and compatible with results of the first study. Results indicate that the SAED emotional and behavior problem subscales measure constructs akin to emotional and behavior problems measured by similar collections of item on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist and Teacher Report Form. Implications of results and recommendations for use of the SAED are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-466
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Child and Family Studies
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Affective Symptoms
Checklist
teacher
special education
student teacher
Students
Special Education
Reproducibility of Results
Problem Behavior
student

Keywords

  • Emotional disturbance
  • Measurement
  • Rating scale
  • Students
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

The scale for assessing emotional disturbance : Concurrent validity. / Cullinan, Douglas; Harniss, Mark; Epstein, Michael H.; Ryser, Gail.

In: Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.01.2001, p. 449-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cullinan, Douglas ; Harniss, Mark ; Epstein, Michael H. ; Ryser, Gail. / The scale for assessing emotional disturbance : Concurrent validity. In: Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2001 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 449-466.
@article{d88395caf26947e9b780cfcc5b32c250,
title = "The scale for assessing emotional disturbance: Concurrent validity",
abstract = "The Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (SAED) is a standardized, normreferenced measure designed to operationalize the federal definition of Emotional Disturbance. It has demonstrated content validity and reliability. The two studies reported here address the SAED's concurrent validity. Samples in each study consisted of students identified with Emotional Disturbance. In both studies, special education teachers rated students on the SAED and a second measure of children 's emotional and behavior problems. In the first study the SAED was compared to the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Correlations were generally moderate to high for similar subscales and low for dissimilar subscales. In the second study, the SAED was compared to the Teacher Report Form. Again, correlations generally were as expected and compatible with results of the first study. Results indicate that the SAED emotional and behavior problem subscales measure constructs akin to emotional and behavior problems measured by similar collections of item on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist and Teacher Report Form. Implications of results and recommendations for use of the SAED are discussed.",
keywords = "Emotional disturbance, Measurement, Rating scale, Students, Validity",
author = "Douglas Cullinan and Mark Harniss and Epstein, {Michael H.} and Gail Ryser",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1016709407756",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "449--466",
journal = "Journal of Child and Family Studies",
issn = "1062-1024",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scale for assessing emotional disturbance

T2 - Concurrent validity

AU - Cullinan, Douglas

AU - Harniss, Mark

AU - Epstein, Michael H.

AU - Ryser, Gail

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - The Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (SAED) is a standardized, normreferenced measure designed to operationalize the federal definition of Emotional Disturbance. It has demonstrated content validity and reliability. The two studies reported here address the SAED's concurrent validity. Samples in each study consisted of students identified with Emotional Disturbance. In both studies, special education teachers rated students on the SAED and a second measure of children 's emotional and behavior problems. In the first study the SAED was compared to the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Correlations were generally moderate to high for similar subscales and low for dissimilar subscales. In the second study, the SAED was compared to the Teacher Report Form. Again, correlations generally were as expected and compatible with results of the first study. Results indicate that the SAED emotional and behavior problem subscales measure constructs akin to emotional and behavior problems measured by similar collections of item on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist and Teacher Report Form. Implications of results and recommendations for use of the SAED are discussed.

AB - The Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (SAED) is a standardized, normreferenced measure designed to operationalize the federal definition of Emotional Disturbance. It has demonstrated content validity and reliability. The two studies reported here address the SAED's concurrent validity. Samples in each study consisted of students identified with Emotional Disturbance. In both studies, special education teachers rated students on the SAED and a second measure of children 's emotional and behavior problems. In the first study the SAED was compared to the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Correlations were generally moderate to high for similar subscales and low for dissimilar subscales. In the second study, the SAED was compared to the Teacher Report Form. Again, correlations generally were as expected and compatible with results of the first study. Results indicate that the SAED emotional and behavior problem subscales measure constructs akin to emotional and behavior problems measured by similar collections of item on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist and Teacher Report Form. Implications of results and recommendations for use of the SAED are discussed.

KW - Emotional disturbance

KW - Measurement

KW - Rating scale

KW - Students

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001445639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001445639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1016709407756

DO - 10.1023/A:1016709407756

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001445639

VL - 10

SP - 449

EP - 466

JO - Journal of Child and Family Studies

JF - Journal of Child and Family Studies

SN - 1062-1024

IS - 4

ER -