The role of autopsy in death resulting from trauma

Joseph C. Stothert, Gbaranen B.M. Gbaanador, David N. Herndon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the difference between clinical impressions and autopsy findings in a group of patients dying on a university surgical service after blunt injury, penetrating injury, or thermal burns. Of 215 patients dying between the years 1984 and 1988, 212 were included in this study (autopsy rate, 98.6%). Major discrepancies in clinical diagnosis versus the anatomic diagnosis at autopsy were found to occur in approximately 30% of patients. The incidence of errors in diagnosis which may have impacted on survival in these groups of injured patients was quite low (5.1%). These data support the continued practice of obtaining autopsy in all patients dying from trauma. This information is clinically relevant, and, in today’s atmosphere of quality assurance, absolutely necessary for a modern trauma center.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1021-1025
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume30
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 1990

Fingerprint

Autopsy
Wounds and Injuries
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Trauma Centers
Atmosphere
Burns
Hot Temperature
Survival
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

The role of autopsy in death resulting from trauma. / Stothert, Joseph C.; Gbaanador, Gbaranen B.M.; Herndon, David N.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 30, No. 8, 08.1990, p. 1021-1025.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stothert, Joseph C. ; Gbaanador, Gbaranen B.M. ; Herndon, David N. / The role of autopsy in death resulting from trauma. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1990 ; Vol. 30, No. 8. pp. 1021-1025.
@article{167848d5bbcf42359d79d0994b77e9e6,
title = "The role of autopsy in death resulting from trauma",
abstract = "This study examined the difference between clinical impressions and autopsy findings in a group of patients dying on a university surgical service after blunt injury, penetrating injury, or thermal burns. Of 215 patients dying between the years 1984 and 1988, 212 were included in this study (autopsy rate, 98.6{\%}). Major discrepancies in clinical diagnosis versus the anatomic diagnosis at autopsy were found to occur in approximately 30{\%} of patients. The incidence of errors in diagnosis which may have impacted on survival in these groups of injured patients was quite low (5.1{\%}). These data support the continued practice of obtaining autopsy in all patients dying from trauma. This information is clinically relevant, and, in today’s atmosphere of quality assurance, absolutely necessary for a modern trauma center.",
author = "Stothert, {Joseph C.} and Gbaanador, {Gbaranen B.M.} and Herndon, {David N.}",
year = "1990",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1021--1025",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of autopsy in death resulting from trauma

AU - Stothert, Joseph C.

AU - Gbaanador, Gbaranen B.M.

AU - Herndon, David N.

PY - 1990/8

Y1 - 1990/8

N2 - This study examined the difference between clinical impressions and autopsy findings in a group of patients dying on a university surgical service after blunt injury, penetrating injury, or thermal burns. Of 215 patients dying between the years 1984 and 1988, 212 were included in this study (autopsy rate, 98.6%). Major discrepancies in clinical diagnosis versus the anatomic diagnosis at autopsy were found to occur in approximately 30% of patients. The incidence of errors in diagnosis which may have impacted on survival in these groups of injured patients was quite low (5.1%). These data support the continued practice of obtaining autopsy in all patients dying from trauma. This information is clinically relevant, and, in today’s atmosphere of quality assurance, absolutely necessary for a modern trauma center.

AB - This study examined the difference between clinical impressions and autopsy findings in a group of patients dying on a university surgical service after blunt injury, penetrating injury, or thermal burns. Of 215 patients dying between the years 1984 and 1988, 212 were included in this study (autopsy rate, 98.6%). Major discrepancies in clinical diagnosis versus the anatomic diagnosis at autopsy were found to occur in approximately 30% of patients. The incidence of errors in diagnosis which may have impacted on survival in these groups of injured patients was quite low (5.1%). These data support the continued practice of obtaining autopsy in all patients dying from trauma. This information is clinically relevant, and, in today’s atmosphere of quality assurance, absolutely necessary for a modern trauma center.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025151097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025151097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2388303

AN - SCOPUS:0025151097

VL - 30

SP - 1021

EP - 1025

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 8

ER -