The reliability and validity of the geriatric depression rating scale administered by telephone

W. J. Burke, William Howard Roccaforte, Steven Phillip Wengel, D. M. Conley, Jane Frances Potter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the reliability and validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale administered by telephone (T-GDS) in patients undergoing outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment. SUBJECTS: A total of 101 geriatric patients were evaluated in a 1-year period at the outpatient Geriatric Assessment Center of the University of Nebraska Medical Center. METHODS: The 30-item GDS was completed by all patients on three occasions: by telephone several days before their assessment, face-to-face during their assessment visit, and several days later, again by phone. During their assessment, all patients were evaluated by one of three geriatric psychiatrists who were blind to all GDS results. The test-retest reliability of the T-GDS was measured by comparing the results of the two phone interviews. The construct validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the initial T-GDS to the GDS obtained during the comprehensive assessment. The criterion validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the T-GDS with the clinical diagnosis of depression assigned by the psychiatrists. RESULTS: The individual items of the initial T-GDS showed substantial concordance with the second T-GDS (kappa range 0.35 - 0.7, mean = 0.52), and with the assessment GDS (kappa range 0.29 - 0.75, mean = 0.52). One item showed evidence of bias when comparing the two T-GDSs, and two items when comparing the initial T-GDS to the GDS done during the assessment. The mean number of symptomatic responses was not significantly different for the T-GDS versus assessment administration but did decline slightly when comparing the two T-GDSs. ROC curve analyses showed good agreement between the clinical diagnosis and the T-GDS. CONCLUSION: The GDS appears to maintain its reliability and validity when administered via telephone and thus may be useful for a variety of epidemiological and clinical purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)674-679
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Telephone
Reproducibility of Results
Geriatrics
Depression
Geriatric Assessment
ROC Curve
Psychiatry
Outpatients
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

The reliability and validity of the geriatric depression rating scale administered by telephone. / Burke, W. J.; Roccaforte, William Howard; Wengel, Steven Phillip; Conley, D. M.; Potter, Jane Frances.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 43, No. 6, 01.01.1995, p. 674-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{24f2f3b9df6c487ead211ce3eddf38ef,
title = "The reliability and validity of the geriatric depression rating scale administered by telephone",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the reliability and validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale administered by telephone (T-GDS) in patients undergoing outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment. SUBJECTS: A total of 101 geriatric patients were evaluated in a 1-year period at the outpatient Geriatric Assessment Center of the University of Nebraska Medical Center. METHODS: The 30-item GDS was completed by all patients on three occasions: by telephone several days before their assessment, face-to-face during their assessment visit, and several days later, again by phone. During their assessment, all patients were evaluated by one of three geriatric psychiatrists who were blind to all GDS results. The test-retest reliability of the T-GDS was measured by comparing the results of the two phone interviews. The construct validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the initial T-GDS to the GDS obtained during the comprehensive assessment. The criterion validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the T-GDS with the clinical diagnosis of depression assigned by the psychiatrists. RESULTS: The individual items of the initial T-GDS showed substantial concordance with the second T-GDS (kappa range 0.35 - 0.7, mean = 0.52), and with the assessment GDS (kappa range 0.29 - 0.75, mean = 0.52). One item showed evidence of bias when comparing the two T-GDSs, and two items when comparing the initial T-GDS to the GDS done during the assessment. The mean number of symptomatic responses was not significantly different for the T-GDS versus assessment administration but did decline slightly when comparing the two T-GDSs. ROC curve analyses showed good agreement between the clinical diagnosis and the T-GDS. CONCLUSION: The GDS appears to maintain its reliability and validity when administered via telephone and thus may be useful for a variety of epidemiological and clinical purposes.",
author = "Burke, {W. J.} and Roccaforte, {William Howard} and Wengel, {Steven Phillip} and Conley, {D. M.} and Potter, {Jane Frances}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07205.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "674--679",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reliability and validity of the geriatric depression rating scale administered by telephone

AU - Burke, W. J.

AU - Roccaforte, William Howard

AU - Wengel, Steven Phillip

AU - Conley, D. M.

AU - Potter, Jane Frances

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the reliability and validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale administered by telephone (T-GDS) in patients undergoing outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment. SUBJECTS: A total of 101 geriatric patients were evaluated in a 1-year period at the outpatient Geriatric Assessment Center of the University of Nebraska Medical Center. METHODS: The 30-item GDS was completed by all patients on three occasions: by telephone several days before their assessment, face-to-face during their assessment visit, and several days later, again by phone. During their assessment, all patients were evaluated by one of three geriatric psychiatrists who were blind to all GDS results. The test-retest reliability of the T-GDS was measured by comparing the results of the two phone interviews. The construct validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the initial T-GDS to the GDS obtained during the comprehensive assessment. The criterion validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the T-GDS with the clinical diagnosis of depression assigned by the psychiatrists. RESULTS: The individual items of the initial T-GDS showed substantial concordance with the second T-GDS (kappa range 0.35 - 0.7, mean = 0.52), and with the assessment GDS (kappa range 0.29 - 0.75, mean = 0.52). One item showed evidence of bias when comparing the two T-GDSs, and two items when comparing the initial T-GDS to the GDS done during the assessment. The mean number of symptomatic responses was not significantly different for the T-GDS versus assessment administration but did decline slightly when comparing the two T-GDSs. ROC curve analyses showed good agreement between the clinical diagnosis and the T-GDS. CONCLUSION: The GDS appears to maintain its reliability and validity when administered via telephone and thus may be useful for a variety of epidemiological and clinical purposes.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the reliability and validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale administered by telephone (T-GDS) in patients undergoing outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment. SUBJECTS: A total of 101 geriatric patients were evaluated in a 1-year period at the outpatient Geriatric Assessment Center of the University of Nebraska Medical Center. METHODS: The 30-item GDS was completed by all patients on three occasions: by telephone several days before their assessment, face-to-face during their assessment visit, and several days later, again by phone. During their assessment, all patients were evaluated by one of three geriatric psychiatrists who were blind to all GDS results. The test-retest reliability of the T-GDS was measured by comparing the results of the two phone interviews. The construct validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the initial T-GDS to the GDS obtained during the comprehensive assessment. The criterion validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the T-GDS with the clinical diagnosis of depression assigned by the psychiatrists. RESULTS: The individual items of the initial T-GDS showed substantial concordance with the second T-GDS (kappa range 0.35 - 0.7, mean = 0.52), and with the assessment GDS (kappa range 0.29 - 0.75, mean = 0.52). One item showed evidence of bias when comparing the two T-GDSs, and two items when comparing the initial T-GDS to the GDS done during the assessment. The mean number of symptomatic responses was not significantly different for the T-GDS versus assessment administration but did decline slightly when comparing the two T-GDSs. ROC curve analyses showed good agreement between the clinical diagnosis and the T-GDS. CONCLUSION: The GDS appears to maintain its reliability and validity when administered via telephone and thus may be useful for a variety of epidemiological and clinical purposes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029062548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029062548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07205.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07205.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 674

EP - 679

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 6

ER -