The relative efficacy of cues for two-dimensional shape perception

Mark Nawrot, Elizabeth Shannon, Matthew Rizzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The visual system uses a variety of cues for form perception, including motion, color, binocular disparity, texture, and luminance. Physiological evidence suggests that these cues are processed by different neural mechanisms. Do the cues processed by some mechanisms convey any advantage for form perception when compared to cues processed by another? In response to this question we assessed the relative efficiency of several cues in conveying two-dimensional form from background noise. For the sake of comparison, every cue type used the same experimental design and stimulus set. Our results confirm that movement is one of the most efficient cues for shape perception. Also, a simple transient cue (an instantaneous flashing on or off) is equally useful. In comparison, local dot density (a type of texture cue) was the least efficient. The efficiencies of most other cues, such as color, stereopsis, and relative movement in noise, were conspicuously similar.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1141-1152
Number of pages12
JournalVision research
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Cues
Form Perception
Noise
Color
Vision Disparity
Efficiency
Depth Perception
Research Design

Keywords

  • Color
  • Form
  • Motion
  • Neural pathway
  • Shape

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

The relative efficacy of cues for two-dimensional shape perception. / Nawrot, Mark; Shannon, Elizabeth; Rizzo, Matthew.

In: Vision research, Vol. 36, No. 8, 01.01.1996, p. 1141-1152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{118391b5e906418ea8713eee1909c7fc,
title = "The relative efficacy of cues for two-dimensional shape perception",
abstract = "The visual system uses a variety of cues for form perception, including motion, color, binocular disparity, texture, and luminance. Physiological evidence suggests that these cues are processed by different neural mechanisms. Do the cues processed by some mechanisms convey any advantage for form perception when compared to cues processed by another? In response to this question we assessed the relative efficiency of several cues in conveying two-dimensional form from background noise. For the sake of comparison, every cue type used the same experimental design and stimulus set. Our results confirm that movement is one of the most efficient cues for shape perception. Also, a simple transient cue (an instantaneous flashing on or off) is equally useful. In comparison, local dot density (a type of texture cue) was the least efficient. The efficiencies of most other cues, such as color, stereopsis, and relative movement in noise, were conspicuously similar.",
keywords = "Color, Form, Motion, Neural pathway, Shape",
author = "Mark Nawrot and Elizabeth Shannon and Matthew Rizzo",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(95)00173-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1141--1152",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relative efficacy of cues for two-dimensional shape perception

AU - Nawrot, Mark

AU - Shannon, Elizabeth

AU - Rizzo, Matthew

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - The visual system uses a variety of cues for form perception, including motion, color, binocular disparity, texture, and luminance. Physiological evidence suggests that these cues are processed by different neural mechanisms. Do the cues processed by some mechanisms convey any advantage for form perception when compared to cues processed by another? In response to this question we assessed the relative efficiency of several cues in conveying two-dimensional form from background noise. For the sake of comparison, every cue type used the same experimental design and stimulus set. Our results confirm that movement is one of the most efficient cues for shape perception. Also, a simple transient cue (an instantaneous flashing on or off) is equally useful. In comparison, local dot density (a type of texture cue) was the least efficient. The efficiencies of most other cues, such as color, stereopsis, and relative movement in noise, were conspicuously similar.

AB - The visual system uses a variety of cues for form perception, including motion, color, binocular disparity, texture, and luminance. Physiological evidence suggests that these cues are processed by different neural mechanisms. Do the cues processed by some mechanisms convey any advantage for form perception when compared to cues processed by another? In response to this question we assessed the relative efficiency of several cues in conveying two-dimensional form from background noise. For the sake of comparison, every cue type used the same experimental design and stimulus set. Our results confirm that movement is one of the most efficient cues for shape perception. Also, a simple transient cue (an instantaneous flashing on or off) is equally useful. In comparison, local dot density (a type of texture cue) was the least efficient. The efficiencies of most other cues, such as color, stereopsis, and relative movement in noise, were conspicuously similar.

KW - Color

KW - Form

KW - Motion

KW - Neural pathway

KW - Shape

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029979581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029979581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00173-5

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00173-5

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1141

EP - 1152

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 8

ER -