The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults

Carolyn J. Brown, Michelle L. Hughes, Betty Luk, Paul J. Abbas, Abigail Wolaver, Jonathan Gervais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

181 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between electrically evoked whole nerve action potential (EAP) and electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds and MAP threshold (T-level) and maximum comfort level (C-level) for subjects who use the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Design: Forty-four adult Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users participated in this study. EAP thresholds were recorded using the Neural Response Telemetry System developed by Cochlear Corporation. EABR thresholds were measured for a subset of 14 subjects using standard evoked potential techniques. These physiologic thresholds were collected on a set of five electrodes spaced across the cochlea, and were then compared with behavioral measures of T-level and C-level used to program the speech processor. Results: EAP thresholds were correlated with MAP T- and C-levels; however, the correlation was not strong. A technique for improving the correlation by combining measures of T- and C-levels made on one electrode with the EAP thresholds was presented. Correlations between predicted and measured T- and C-levels using this technique were 9.83 and 9.77, respectively. Similar results were obtained using the EABR thresholds for a smaller set of subjects. In general, EABR thresholds were recorded at levels that were approximately 4.7 programming units lower than EAP thresholds. Conclusions: Either EAP or EABR thresholds can be used in combination with a limited amount of behavioral information to predict MAP T- and C-levels with reasonable accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-163
Number of pages13
JournalEar and hearing
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2000

Fingerprint

Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Cochlear Implants
Cochlea
Electrodes
Telemetry
Evoked Potentials
Action Potentials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor : Data from adults. / Brown, Carolyn J.; Hughes, Michelle L.; Luk, Betty; Abbas, Paul J.; Wolaver, Abigail; Gervais, Jonathan.

In: Ear and hearing, Vol. 21, No. 2, 04.2000, p. 151-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Carolyn J. ; Hughes, Michelle L. ; Luk, Betty ; Abbas, Paul J. ; Wolaver, Abigail ; Gervais, Jonathan. / The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor : Data from adults. In: Ear and hearing. 2000 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 151-163.
@article{a42035eb155a4d62bf51f93bf01ef27d,
title = "The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between electrically evoked whole nerve action potential (EAP) and electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds and MAP threshold (T-level) and maximum comfort level (C-level) for subjects who use the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Design: Forty-four adult Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users participated in this study. EAP thresholds were recorded using the Neural Response Telemetry System developed by Cochlear Corporation. EABR thresholds were measured for a subset of 14 subjects using standard evoked potential techniques. These physiologic thresholds were collected on a set of five electrodes spaced across the cochlea, and were then compared with behavioral measures of T-level and C-level used to program the speech processor. Results: EAP thresholds were correlated with MAP T- and C-levels; however, the correlation was not strong. A technique for improving the correlation by combining measures of T- and C-levels made on one electrode with the EAP thresholds was presented. Correlations between predicted and measured T- and C-levels using this technique were 9.83 and 9.77, respectively. Similar results were obtained using the EABR thresholds for a smaller set of subjects. In general, EABR thresholds were recorded at levels that were approximately 4.7 programming units lower than EAP thresholds. Conclusions: Either EAP or EABR thresholds can be used in combination with a limited amount of behavioral information to predict MAP T- and C-levels with reasonable accuracy.",
author = "Brown, {Carolyn J.} and Hughes, {Michelle L.} and Betty Luk and Abbas, {Paul J.} and Abigail Wolaver and Jonathan Gervais",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "151--163",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor

T2 - Data from adults

AU - Brown, Carolyn J.

AU - Hughes, Michelle L.

AU - Luk, Betty

AU - Abbas, Paul J.

AU - Wolaver, Abigail

AU - Gervais, Jonathan

PY - 2000/4

Y1 - 2000/4

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between electrically evoked whole nerve action potential (EAP) and electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds and MAP threshold (T-level) and maximum comfort level (C-level) for subjects who use the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Design: Forty-four adult Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users participated in this study. EAP thresholds were recorded using the Neural Response Telemetry System developed by Cochlear Corporation. EABR thresholds were measured for a subset of 14 subjects using standard evoked potential techniques. These physiologic thresholds were collected on a set of five electrodes spaced across the cochlea, and were then compared with behavioral measures of T-level and C-level used to program the speech processor. Results: EAP thresholds were correlated with MAP T- and C-levels; however, the correlation was not strong. A technique for improving the correlation by combining measures of T- and C-levels made on one electrode with the EAP thresholds was presented. Correlations between predicted and measured T- and C-levels using this technique were 9.83 and 9.77, respectively. Similar results were obtained using the EABR thresholds for a smaller set of subjects. In general, EABR thresholds were recorded at levels that were approximately 4.7 programming units lower than EAP thresholds. Conclusions: Either EAP or EABR thresholds can be used in combination with a limited amount of behavioral information to predict MAP T- and C-levels with reasonable accuracy.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between electrically evoked whole nerve action potential (EAP) and electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds and MAP threshold (T-level) and maximum comfort level (C-level) for subjects who use the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Design: Forty-four adult Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users participated in this study. EAP thresholds were recorded using the Neural Response Telemetry System developed by Cochlear Corporation. EABR thresholds were measured for a subset of 14 subjects using standard evoked potential techniques. These physiologic thresholds were collected on a set of five electrodes spaced across the cochlea, and were then compared with behavioral measures of T-level and C-level used to program the speech processor. Results: EAP thresholds were correlated with MAP T- and C-levels; however, the correlation was not strong. A technique for improving the correlation by combining measures of T- and C-levels made on one electrode with the EAP thresholds was presented. Correlations between predicted and measured T- and C-levels using this technique were 9.83 and 9.77, respectively. Similar results were obtained using the EABR thresholds for a smaller set of subjects. In general, EABR thresholds were recorded at levels that were approximately 4.7 programming units lower than EAP thresholds. Conclusions: Either EAP or EABR thresholds can be used in combination with a limited amount of behavioral information to predict MAP T- and C-levels with reasonable accuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034113705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034113705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009

DO - 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009

M3 - Article

C2 - 10777022

AN - SCOPUS:0034113705

VL - 21

SP - 151

EP - 163

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 2

ER -