The reimbursement gap

Providing and paying for pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department

William M McDonnell, Elisabeth Guenther, Laurie F. Larsen, Jeff Schunk

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

A number of medical, ethical, and legal obligations compel physicians to provide procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) to pediatric patients requiring painful procedures in the emergency department (ED). Recognizing the additional demands that PSA places on ED physicians, the American Medical Association has approved Current Procedural Terminology codes for PSA in conjunction with ED procedures. However, some insurers have indicated reluctance or refusal to pay for PSA in the ED, despite these Current Procedural Terminology codes and the legal and ethical imperatives. This reimbursement gap between an obligation to provide care and an inability to obtain reimbursement from insurers places ED physicians who care for children in an awkward position. This article reviews physicians' legal and ethical obligations to provide PSA to pediatric patients in the ED, assesses health insurers' obligations to pay for this procedure, and examines insurers' policies and practices. We found significant variability among private and public insurers in their willingness to pay for PSA. Emergency department PSA charges at one tertiary care pediatric center are reimbursed at less than half the rate of other ED services. Although existing state laws and federal regulations arguably require that insurers provide reimbursement for pediatric PSA, certain legislative and regulatory initiatives could clarify insurers' payment obligations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)797-802
Number of pages6
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume25
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

Fingerprint

Insurance Carriers
Analgesia
Hospital Emergency Service
Pediatrics
Current Procedural Terminology
Physicians
Jurisprudence
American Medical Association
Child Care
Tertiary Care Centers
Health

Keywords

  • Health insurance coverage
  • Health policy
  • Legal issues
  • Reimbursement
  • Sedation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The reimbursement gap : Providing and paying for pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department. / McDonnell, William M; Guenther, Elisabeth; Larsen, Laurie F.; Schunk, Jeff.

In: Pediatric Emergency Care, Vol. 25, No. 11, 01.11.2009, p. 797-802.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

McDonnell, William M ; Guenther, Elisabeth ; Larsen, Laurie F. ; Schunk, Jeff. / The reimbursement gap : Providing and paying for pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department. In: Pediatric Emergency Care. 2009 ; Vol. 25, No. 11. pp. 797-802.
@article{d9d1a9ae137b462e94219e3a77990e85,
title = "The reimbursement gap: Providing and paying for pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department",
abstract = "A number of medical, ethical, and legal obligations compel physicians to provide procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) to pediatric patients requiring painful procedures in the emergency department (ED). Recognizing the additional demands that PSA places on ED physicians, the American Medical Association has approved Current Procedural Terminology codes for PSA in conjunction with ED procedures. However, some insurers have indicated reluctance or refusal to pay for PSA in the ED, despite these Current Procedural Terminology codes and the legal and ethical imperatives. This reimbursement gap between an obligation to provide care and an inability to obtain reimbursement from insurers places ED physicians who care for children in an awkward position. This article reviews physicians' legal and ethical obligations to provide PSA to pediatric patients in the ED, assesses health insurers' obligations to pay for this procedure, and examines insurers' policies and practices. We found significant variability among private and public insurers in their willingness to pay for PSA. Emergency department PSA charges at one tertiary care pediatric center are reimbursed at less than half the rate of other ED services. Although existing state laws and federal regulations arguably require that insurers provide reimbursement for pediatric PSA, certain legislative and regulatory initiatives could clarify insurers' payment obligations.",
keywords = "Health insurance coverage, Health policy, Legal issues, Reimbursement, Sedation",
author = "McDonnell, {William M} and Elisabeth Guenther and Larsen, {Laurie F.} and Jeff Schunk",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181bec9a4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "797--802",
journal = "Pediatric Emergency Care",
issn = "0749-5161",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reimbursement gap

T2 - Providing and paying for pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department

AU - McDonnell, William M

AU - Guenther, Elisabeth

AU - Larsen, Laurie F.

AU - Schunk, Jeff

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - A number of medical, ethical, and legal obligations compel physicians to provide procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) to pediatric patients requiring painful procedures in the emergency department (ED). Recognizing the additional demands that PSA places on ED physicians, the American Medical Association has approved Current Procedural Terminology codes for PSA in conjunction with ED procedures. However, some insurers have indicated reluctance or refusal to pay for PSA in the ED, despite these Current Procedural Terminology codes and the legal and ethical imperatives. This reimbursement gap between an obligation to provide care and an inability to obtain reimbursement from insurers places ED physicians who care for children in an awkward position. This article reviews physicians' legal and ethical obligations to provide PSA to pediatric patients in the ED, assesses health insurers' obligations to pay for this procedure, and examines insurers' policies and practices. We found significant variability among private and public insurers in their willingness to pay for PSA. Emergency department PSA charges at one tertiary care pediatric center are reimbursed at less than half the rate of other ED services. Although existing state laws and federal regulations arguably require that insurers provide reimbursement for pediatric PSA, certain legislative and regulatory initiatives could clarify insurers' payment obligations.

AB - A number of medical, ethical, and legal obligations compel physicians to provide procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) to pediatric patients requiring painful procedures in the emergency department (ED). Recognizing the additional demands that PSA places on ED physicians, the American Medical Association has approved Current Procedural Terminology codes for PSA in conjunction with ED procedures. However, some insurers have indicated reluctance or refusal to pay for PSA in the ED, despite these Current Procedural Terminology codes and the legal and ethical imperatives. This reimbursement gap between an obligation to provide care and an inability to obtain reimbursement from insurers places ED physicians who care for children in an awkward position. This article reviews physicians' legal and ethical obligations to provide PSA to pediatric patients in the ED, assesses health insurers' obligations to pay for this procedure, and examines insurers' policies and practices. We found significant variability among private and public insurers in their willingness to pay for PSA. Emergency department PSA charges at one tertiary care pediatric center are reimbursed at less than half the rate of other ED services. Although existing state laws and federal regulations arguably require that insurers provide reimbursement for pediatric PSA, certain legislative and regulatory initiatives could clarify insurers' payment obligations.

KW - Health insurance coverage

KW - Health policy

KW - Legal issues

KW - Reimbursement

KW - Sedation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73349120590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73349120590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181bec9a4

DO - 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181bec9a4

M3 - Review article

VL - 25

SP - 797

EP - 802

JO - Pediatric Emergency Care

JF - Pediatric Emergency Care

SN - 0749-5161

IS - 11

ER -