The rationality of drawing big conclusions based on small samples: In defense of mill’s methods

Jukka Savolainen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Skocpol endorses the application of Mill’s methods of causal inference for comparative historical explanations. According to Lieberson (1991), in studies where the sample size is very small, Mill’s methods are inappropriate because they: (1) do not allow for probabilistic theories; (2) cannot handle interaction effects; (3) cannot accommodate multiple causes; (4) require the absence of measurement errors. Each of these claims turn out to be incorrect due to confusion over the uses of Mill’ methods, failure to appreciate the aims of case-oriented explanations, and a narrow conception of cause. Small sample size does not constitute an obstacle to the application of Mill’s methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1217-1224
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Forces
Volume72
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1994

Fingerprint

rationality
cause
Rationality
Small Sample
interaction
Sample Size
Causes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The rationality of drawing big conclusions based on small samples : In defense of mill’s methods. / Savolainen, Jukka.

In: Social Forces, Vol. 72, No. 4, 06.1994, p. 1217-1224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e76f20a95bfd482b90a0e3043583a707,
title = "The rationality of drawing big conclusions based on small samples: In defense of mill’s methods",
abstract = "Skocpol endorses the application of Mill’s methods of causal inference for comparative historical explanations. According to Lieberson (1991), in studies where the sample size is very small, Mill’s methods are inappropriate because they: (1) do not allow for probabilistic theories; (2) cannot handle interaction effects; (3) cannot accommodate multiple causes; (4) require the absence of measurement errors. Each of these claims turn out to be incorrect due to confusion over the uses of Mill’ methods, failure to appreciate the aims of case-oriented explanations, and a narrow conception of cause. Small sample size does not constitute an obstacle to the application of Mill’s methods.",
author = "Jukka Savolainen",
year = "1994",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1093/sf/72.4.1217",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "1217--1224",
journal = "Social Forces",
issn = "0037-7732",
publisher = "University of North Carolina Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rationality of drawing big conclusions based on small samples

T2 - In defense of mill’s methods

AU - Savolainen, Jukka

PY - 1994/6

Y1 - 1994/6

N2 - Skocpol endorses the application of Mill’s methods of causal inference for comparative historical explanations. According to Lieberson (1991), in studies where the sample size is very small, Mill’s methods are inappropriate because they: (1) do not allow for probabilistic theories; (2) cannot handle interaction effects; (3) cannot accommodate multiple causes; (4) require the absence of measurement errors. Each of these claims turn out to be incorrect due to confusion over the uses of Mill’ methods, failure to appreciate the aims of case-oriented explanations, and a narrow conception of cause. Small sample size does not constitute an obstacle to the application of Mill’s methods.

AB - Skocpol endorses the application of Mill’s methods of causal inference for comparative historical explanations. According to Lieberson (1991), in studies where the sample size is very small, Mill’s methods are inappropriate because they: (1) do not allow for probabilistic theories; (2) cannot handle interaction effects; (3) cannot accommodate multiple causes; (4) require the absence of measurement errors. Each of these claims turn out to be incorrect due to confusion over the uses of Mill’ methods, failure to appreciate the aims of case-oriented explanations, and a narrow conception of cause. Small sample size does not constitute an obstacle to the application of Mill’s methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963012276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963012276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/sf/72.4.1217

DO - 10.1093/sf/72.4.1217

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963012276

VL - 72

SP - 1217

EP - 1224

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

SN - 0037-7732

IS - 4

ER -