The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception

Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks

Barbara Blakeslee, Davis Cope, Mark McCourt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness (perceived intensity) by Blakeslee and McCourt (Vision Research 39:4361-4377, 1999), which is based on linear spatial filtering by oriented receptive fields followed by contrast normalization, has proven highly successful in parsimoniously predicting the perceived intensity (brightness) of regions in complex visual stimuli such as White's effect, which had been believed to defy filter-based explanations. Unlike competing explanations such as anchoring theory, filling-in, edge-integration, or layer decomposition, the spatial filtering approach embodied by the ODOG model readily accounts for the often overlooked but ubiquitous gradient structure of induction which, while most striking in grating induction, also occurs within the test fields of classical simultaneous brightness contrast and the White stimulus. Also, because the ODOG model does not require defined regions of interest, it is generalizable to any stimulus, including natural images. The ODOG model has motivated other researchers to develop modified versions (LODOG and FLODOG), and has served as an important counterweight and proof of concept to constrain high-level theories which rely on less well understood or justified mechanisms such as unconscious inference, transparency, perceptual grouping, and layer decomposition. Here we provide a brief but comprehensive description of the ODOG model as it has been implemented since 1999, as well as working Mathematica (Wolfram, Inc.) notebooks which users can employ to generate ODOG model predictions for their own stimuli.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)306-312
Number of pages7
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tungsten
Research Personnel
Research
Unconscious (Psychology)
Brightness
Notebook
Stimulus

Keywords

  • Complex visual stimuli
  • Model of brightness
  • Notebooks
  • ODOG model predictions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception : Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks. / Blakeslee, Barbara; Cope, Davis; McCourt, Mark.

In: Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 48, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 306-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed06fda9280144e388faeb7d8f274daa,
title = "The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception: Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks",
abstract = "The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness (perceived intensity) by Blakeslee and McCourt (Vision Research 39:4361-4377, 1999), which is based on linear spatial filtering by oriented receptive fields followed by contrast normalization, has proven highly successful in parsimoniously predicting the perceived intensity (brightness) of regions in complex visual stimuli such as White's effect, which had been believed to defy filter-based explanations. Unlike competing explanations such as anchoring theory, filling-in, edge-integration, or layer decomposition, the spatial filtering approach embodied by the ODOG model readily accounts for the often overlooked but ubiquitous gradient structure of induction which, while most striking in grating induction, also occurs within the test fields of classical simultaneous brightness contrast and the White stimulus. Also, because the ODOG model does not require defined regions of interest, it is generalizable to any stimulus, including natural images. The ODOG model has motivated other researchers to develop modified versions (LODOG and FLODOG), and has served as an important counterweight and proof of concept to constrain high-level theories which rely on less well understood or justified mechanisms such as unconscious inference, transparency, perceptual grouping, and layer decomposition. Here we provide a brief but comprehensive description of the ODOG model as it has been implemented since 1999, as well as working Mathematica (Wolfram, Inc.) notebooks which users can employ to generate ODOG model predictions for their own stimuli.",
keywords = "Complex visual stimuli, Model of brightness, Notebooks, ODOG model predictions",
author = "Barbara Blakeslee and Davis Cope and Mark McCourt",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13428-015-0573-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "306--312",
journal = "Behavior Research Methods",
issn = "1554-351X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception

T2 - Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks

AU - Blakeslee, Barbara

AU - Cope, Davis

AU - McCourt, Mark

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness (perceived intensity) by Blakeslee and McCourt (Vision Research 39:4361-4377, 1999), which is based on linear spatial filtering by oriented receptive fields followed by contrast normalization, has proven highly successful in parsimoniously predicting the perceived intensity (brightness) of regions in complex visual stimuli such as White's effect, which had been believed to defy filter-based explanations. Unlike competing explanations such as anchoring theory, filling-in, edge-integration, or layer decomposition, the spatial filtering approach embodied by the ODOG model readily accounts for the often overlooked but ubiquitous gradient structure of induction which, while most striking in grating induction, also occurs within the test fields of classical simultaneous brightness contrast and the White stimulus. Also, because the ODOG model does not require defined regions of interest, it is generalizable to any stimulus, including natural images. The ODOG model has motivated other researchers to develop modified versions (LODOG and FLODOG), and has served as an important counterweight and proof of concept to constrain high-level theories which rely on less well understood or justified mechanisms such as unconscious inference, transparency, perceptual grouping, and layer decomposition. Here we provide a brief but comprehensive description of the ODOG model as it has been implemented since 1999, as well as working Mathematica (Wolfram, Inc.) notebooks which users can employ to generate ODOG model predictions for their own stimuli.

AB - The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness (perceived intensity) by Blakeslee and McCourt (Vision Research 39:4361-4377, 1999), which is based on linear spatial filtering by oriented receptive fields followed by contrast normalization, has proven highly successful in parsimoniously predicting the perceived intensity (brightness) of regions in complex visual stimuli such as White's effect, which had been believed to defy filter-based explanations. Unlike competing explanations such as anchoring theory, filling-in, edge-integration, or layer decomposition, the spatial filtering approach embodied by the ODOG model readily accounts for the often overlooked but ubiquitous gradient structure of induction which, while most striking in grating induction, also occurs within the test fields of classical simultaneous brightness contrast and the White stimulus. Also, because the ODOG model does not require defined regions of interest, it is generalizable to any stimulus, including natural images. The ODOG model has motivated other researchers to develop modified versions (LODOG and FLODOG), and has served as an important counterweight and proof of concept to constrain high-level theories which rely on less well understood or justified mechanisms such as unconscious inference, transparency, perceptual grouping, and layer decomposition. Here we provide a brief but comprehensive description of the ODOG model as it has been implemented since 1999, as well as working Mathematica (Wolfram, Inc.) notebooks which users can employ to generate ODOG model predictions for their own stimuli.

KW - Complex visual stimuli

KW - Model of brightness

KW - Notebooks

KW - ODOG model predictions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924560161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924560161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13428-015-0573-4

DO - 10.3758/s13428-015-0573-4

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 306

EP - 312

JO - Behavior Research Methods

JF - Behavior Research Methods

SN - 1554-351X

IS - 1

ER -