The "obama effect"? Priming contemporary racial milestones increases implicit racial bias among whites

Allison L. Skinner, Jacob E. Cheadle

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research was designed to test if priming the election of President Obama as a contemporary racial milestone would increase implicit racial bias among White Americans. Participants (N = 202) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: A power threat prime (Obama), a majority threat prime (shifting racial demographics of the U.S.), or no prime, before completing an implicit measure of positive and negative associations with Whites and Blacks. Consistent with group threat theory, both group threat primes increased implicit anti-Black bias. In the power threat prime (Obama) condition, only those with lower internal motivation to respond without prejudice showed elevated implicit bias. Findings indicate that framing Obama as a racial pioneer elicits group threat reactions among Whites with low internal motivation to respond without prejudice, increasing implicit anti-Black bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)544-558
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Racism
Motivation
Demography
Research
Power (Psychology)
hydroquinone

Keywords

  • Group threat
  • Implicit bias
  • Internal motivation to respond without prejudice
  • Obama
  • Racial prejudice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The "obama effect"? Priming contemporary racial milestones increases implicit racial bias among whites. / Skinner, Allison L.; Cheadle, Jacob E.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 34, No. 6, 01.01.2016, p. 544-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6f3b6b41ba534bae9460126efc72b731,
title = "The {"}obama effect{"}? Priming contemporary racial milestones increases implicit racial bias among whites",
abstract = "This research was designed to test if priming the election of President Obama as a contemporary racial milestone would increase implicit racial bias among White Americans. Participants (N = 202) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: A power threat prime (Obama), a majority threat prime (shifting racial demographics of the U.S.), or no prime, before completing an implicit measure of positive and negative associations with Whites and Blacks. Consistent with group threat theory, both group threat primes increased implicit anti-Black bias. In the power threat prime (Obama) condition, only those with lower internal motivation to respond without prejudice showed elevated implicit bias. Findings indicate that framing Obama as a racial pioneer elicits group threat reactions among Whites with low internal motivation to respond without prejudice, increasing implicit anti-Black bias.",
keywords = "Group threat, Implicit bias, Internal motivation to respond without prejudice, Obama, Racial prejudice",
author = "Skinner, {Allison L.} and Cheadle, {Jacob E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2016.34.6.544",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "544--558",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "obama effect"? Priming contemporary racial milestones increases implicit racial bias among whites

AU - Skinner, Allison L.

AU - Cheadle, Jacob E.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This research was designed to test if priming the election of President Obama as a contemporary racial milestone would increase implicit racial bias among White Americans. Participants (N = 202) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: A power threat prime (Obama), a majority threat prime (shifting racial demographics of the U.S.), or no prime, before completing an implicit measure of positive and negative associations with Whites and Blacks. Consistent with group threat theory, both group threat primes increased implicit anti-Black bias. In the power threat prime (Obama) condition, only those with lower internal motivation to respond without prejudice showed elevated implicit bias. Findings indicate that framing Obama as a racial pioneer elicits group threat reactions among Whites with low internal motivation to respond without prejudice, increasing implicit anti-Black bias.

AB - This research was designed to test if priming the election of President Obama as a contemporary racial milestone would increase implicit racial bias among White Americans. Participants (N = 202) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: A power threat prime (Obama), a majority threat prime (shifting racial demographics of the U.S.), or no prime, before completing an implicit measure of positive and negative associations with Whites and Blacks. Consistent with group threat theory, both group threat primes increased implicit anti-Black bias. In the power threat prime (Obama) condition, only those with lower internal motivation to respond without prejudice showed elevated implicit bias. Findings indicate that framing Obama as a racial pioneer elicits group threat reactions among Whites with low internal motivation to respond without prejudice, increasing implicit anti-Black bias.

KW - Group threat

KW - Implicit bias

KW - Internal motivation to respond without prejudice

KW - Obama

KW - Racial prejudice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994885780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994885780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2016.34.6.544

DO - 10.1521/soco.2016.34.6.544

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84994885780

VL - 34

SP - 544

EP - 558

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 6

ER -