The new stem faculty profile

Balancing family and dual careers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This chapter contrasts "ideal worker" with "real worker" characteristics among STEM faculty in gendered organizations. The gap between the two reveals the need for academic institutions to revise the notion of and the policies for typical faculty members.

Design: All STEM faculty at a Midwestern research intensive university were asked to participate in a mail and web-based survey to study faculty experiences within departments. The response rate was 70%. Faculty were then categorized by their employment, education, and parent status, and by the work status of their spouse/partner, to assess how closely the faculty matched the ideal academic worker: a faculty member with a full-time home-maker partner.

Findings: Only 13% of the surveyed STEM faculty resemble the "ideal worker" by having a partner who is not employed and who ensures all family care giving. The vast majority of STEM faculty are men with an employed partner who is more likely to have a professional (33%) rather than a nonprofessional (22%) degree.

Research limitations: Only one, public, research-intensive institution in the Midwest United States was surveyed and therefore findings cannot be generalized to faculty at other research intensive institutions or to other types of institutions.

Practical implications: Rather than adding policies to attract women into academia, we find an urgent need make academic institutions rethink to match the reality of most faculty. Increasing flexibility in the academic workplace is not a "women's issue" but a "faculty issue.".

Value: This paper provides evidence that supports institutional change to accommodate the new academic workers, most of whom are part of dual career couples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-20
Number of pages18
JournalAdvances in Gender Research
Volume19
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

career
worker
dual career couple
women's issues
institutional change
spouse
parents
flexibility
workplace
university
evidence

Keywords

  • Career-life balance
  • Dual Career
  • Gender equity
  • Ideal worker
  • Institutional change
  • STEM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

The new stem faculty profile : Balancing family and dual careers. / Wonch Hill, Patricia A; Holmes, Mary Anne; McQuillan, Julia.

In: Advances in Gender Research, Vol. 19, 01.01.2014, p. 3-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c457fbed8794dc5812c0769b61018c1,
title = "The new stem faculty profile: Balancing family and dual careers",
abstract = "Purpose: This chapter contrasts {"}ideal worker{"} with {"}real worker{"} characteristics among STEM faculty in gendered organizations. The gap between the two reveals the need for academic institutions to revise the notion of and the policies for typical faculty members.Design: All STEM faculty at a Midwestern research intensive university were asked to participate in a mail and web-based survey to study faculty experiences within departments. The response rate was 70{\%}. Faculty were then categorized by their employment, education, and parent status, and by the work status of their spouse/partner, to assess how closely the faculty matched the ideal academic worker: a faculty member with a full-time home-maker partner.Findings: Only 13{\%} of the surveyed STEM faculty resemble the {"}ideal worker{"} by having a partner who is not employed and who ensures all family care giving. The vast majority of STEM faculty are men with an employed partner who is more likely to have a professional (33{\%}) rather than a nonprofessional (22{\%}) degree.Research limitations: Only one, public, research-intensive institution in the Midwest United States was surveyed and therefore findings cannot be generalized to faculty at other research intensive institutions or to other types of institutions.Practical implications: Rather than adding policies to attract women into academia, we find an urgent need make academic institutions rethink to match the reality of most faculty. Increasing flexibility in the academic workplace is not a {"}women's issue{"} but a {"}faculty issue.{"}.Value: This paper provides evidence that supports institutional change to accommodate the new academic workers, most of whom are part of dual career couples.",
keywords = "Career-life balance, Dual Career, Gender equity, Ideal worker, Institutional change, STEM",
author = "{Wonch Hill}, {Patricia A} and Holmes, {Mary Anne} and Julia McQuillan",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S1529-212620140000019001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "3--20",
journal = "Advances in Gender Research",
issn = "1529-2126",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The new stem faculty profile

T2 - Balancing family and dual careers

AU - Wonch Hill, Patricia A

AU - Holmes, Mary Anne

AU - McQuillan, Julia

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose: This chapter contrasts "ideal worker" with "real worker" characteristics among STEM faculty in gendered organizations. The gap between the two reveals the need for academic institutions to revise the notion of and the policies for typical faculty members.Design: All STEM faculty at a Midwestern research intensive university were asked to participate in a mail and web-based survey to study faculty experiences within departments. The response rate was 70%. Faculty were then categorized by their employment, education, and parent status, and by the work status of their spouse/partner, to assess how closely the faculty matched the ideal academic worker: a faculty member with a full-time home-maker partner.Findings: Only 13% of the surveyed STEM faculty resemble the "ideal worker" by having a partner who is not employed and who ensures all family care giving. The vast majority of STEM faculty are men with an employed partner who is more likely to have a professional (33%) rather than a nonprofessional (22%) degree.Research limitations: Only one, public, research-intensive institution in the Midwest United States was surveyed and therefore findings cannot be generalized to faculty at other research intensive institutions or to other types of institutions.Practical implications: Rather than adding policies to attract women into academia, we find an urgent need make academic institutions rethink to match the reality of most faculty. Increasing flexibility in the academic workplace is not a "women's issue" but a "faculty issue.".Value: This paper provides evidence that supports institutional change to accommodate the new academic workers, most of whom are part of dual career couples.

AB - Purpose: This chapter contrasts "ideal worker" with "real worker" characteristics among STEM faculty in gendered organizations. The gap between the two reveals the need for academic institutions to revise the notion of and the policies for typical faculty members.Design: All STEM faculty at a Midwestern research intensive university were asked to participate in a mail and web-based survey to study faculty experiences within departments. The response rate was 70%. Faculty were then categorized by their employment, education, and parent status, and by the work status of their spouse/partner, to assess how closely the faculty matched the ideal academic worker: a faculty member with a full-time home-maker partner.Findings: Only 13% of the surveyed STEM faculty resemble the "ideal worker" by having a partner who is not employed and who ensures all family care giving. The vast majority of STEM faculty are men with an employed partner who is more likely to have a professional (33%) rather than a nonprofessional (22%) degree.Research limitations: Only one, public, research-intensive institution in the Midwest United States was surveyed and therefore findings cannot be generalized to faculty at other research intensive institutions or to other types of institutions.Practical implications: Rather than adding policies to attract women into academia, we find an urgent need make academic institutions rethink to match the reality of most faculty. Increasing flexibility in the academic workplace is not a "women's issue" but a "faculty issue.".Value: This paper provides evidence that supports institutional change to accommodate the new academic workers, most of whom are part of dual career couples.

KW - Career-life balance

KW - Dual Career

KW - Gender equity

KW - Ideal worker

KW - Institutional change

KW - STEM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911428827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911428827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1529-212620140000019001

DO - 10.1108/S1529-212620140000019001

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 3

EP - 20

JO - Advances in Gender Research

JF - Advances in Gender Research

SN - 1529-2126

ER -