The New Hampshire effect in presidential nominations

Wayne P. Steger, Andrew J. Dowdle, Randall E. Adkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to demonstrate challenges to conventional wisdom (Aldrich 1980a, b; Bartels 1985 1988; Orren and Polsby 1987), this article develops several forecasting models of the presidential primary vote to compare to a baseline model of the aggregate primary vote (APV) that uses pre-primary and New Hampshire primary data. The models indicate that candidates' Gallup poll position and cash reserves are significant positive predictors of a candidates' primary vote share, though there are differences between forecasting models of the primary vote in Democratic and Republican nomination campaigns. Parallel models incorporating results of the New Hampshire primary improve the predictive power of the baseline model, indicating that the bellwether primary has a "correcting" effect on the relative standings of some candidates seeking a presidential nomination. This effect is substantially greater for Democrats than for Republicans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-390
Number of pages16
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

voter
candidacy
wisdom
campaign

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The New Hampshire effect in presidential nominations. / Steger, Wayne P.; Dowdle, Andrew J.; Adkins, Randall E.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 375-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Steger, Wayne P. ; Dowdle, Andrew J. ; Adkins, Randall E. / The New Hampshire effect in presidential nominations. In: Political Research Quarterly. 2004 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 375-390.
@article{b49ab4550b0d4c4dac303fff835bd6f4,
title = "The New Hampshire effect in presidential nominations",
abstract = "In order to demonstrate challenges to conventional wisdom (Aldrich 1980a, b; Bartels 1985 1988; Orren and Polsby 1987), this article develops several forecasting models of the presidential primary vote to compare to a baseline model of the aggregate primary vote (APV) that uses pre-primary and New Hampshire primary data. The models indicate that candidates' Gallup poll position and cash reserves are significant positive predictors of a candidates' primary vote share, though there are differences between forecasting models of the primary vote in Democratic and Republican nomination campaigns. Parallel models incorporating results of the New Hampshire primary improve the predictive power of the baseline model, indicating that the bellwether primary has a {"}correcting{"} effect on the relative standings of some candidates seeking a presidential nomination. This effect is substantially greater for Democrats than for Republicans.",
author = "Steger, {Wayne P.} and Dowdle, {Andrew J.} and Adkins, {Randall E.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/106591290405700303",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "375--390",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The New Hampshire effect in presidential nominations

AU - Steger, Wayne P.

AU - Dowdle, Andrew J.

AU - Adkins, Randall E.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - In order to demonstrate challenges to conventional wisdom (Aldrich 1980a, b; Bartels 1985 1988; Orren and Polsby 1987), this article develops several forecasting models of the presidential primary vote to compare to a baseline model of the aggregate primary vote (APV) that uses pre-primary and New Hampshire primary data. The models indicate that candidates' Gallup poll position and cash reserves are significant positive predictors of a candidates' primary vote share, though there are differences between forecasting models of the primary vote in Democratic and Republican nomination campaigns. Parallel models incorporating results of the New Hampshire primary improve the predictive power of the baseline model, indicating that the bellwether primary has a "correcting" effect on the relative standings of some candidates seeking a presidential nomination. This effect is substantially greater for Democrats than for Republicans.

AB - In order to demonstrate challenges to conventional wisdom (Aldrich 1980a, b; Bartels 1985 1988; Orren and Polsby 1987), this article develops several forecasting models of the presidential primary vote to compare to a baseline model of the aggregate primary vote (APV) that uses pre-primary and New Hampshire primary data. The models indicate that candidates' Gallup poll position and cash reserves are significant positive predictors of a candidates' primary vote share, though there are differences between forecasting models of the primary vote in Democratic and Republican nomination campaigns. Parallel models incorporating results of the New Hampshire primary improve the predictive power of the baseline model, indicating that the bellwether primary has a "correcting" effect on the relative standings of some candidates seeking a presidential nomination. This effect is substantially greater for Democrats than for Republicans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8744306231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8744306231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/106591290405700303

DO - 10.1177/106591290405700303

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:8744306231

VL - 57

SP - 375

EP - 390

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 3

ER -