The Neural Correlates of Cognitive Objectification

An ERP Study on the Body Inversion Effect Associated With Sexualized Bodies

Philippe Bernard, Tiziana Rizzo, Ingrid Hoonhorst, Gaétane Deliens, Sarah J Gervais, Julia Eberlen, Clémence Bayard, Paul Deltenre, Cécile Colin, Olivier Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At an early stage of visual processing, human faces and bodies are typically associated with larger N170s when presented in an inverted (vs. upright) position, indexing the involvement of configural processing. We challenged this view and hypothesized that sexualized bodies would not be sensitive to inversion, thereby suggesting that they would be processed similarly to objects. Participants saw sexualized male and female bodies, nonsexualized male and female bodies, as well as objects in both upright and inverted positions while we recorded the N170. Results indicated that inverted (vs. upright) nonsexualized male and female bodies were associated with larger N170 amplitudes. In contrast, no N170 amplitude inversion effect emerged for sexualized male and female bodies or objects. These results suggest that sexualized bodies are processed similarly to objects and quite differently than nonsexualized bodies. We discuss the results and their implications in the light of the literatures in person perception and objectification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Human Body

Keywords

  • body inversion
  • cognitive neuroscience
  • configural and analytic processing
  • dehumanization
  • N170
  • objectification
  • psychophysiology
  • sexualization
  • social neuroscience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The Neural Correlates of Cognitive Objectification : An ERP Study on the Body Inversion Effect Associated With Sexualized Bodies. / Bernard, Philippe; Rizzo, Tiziana; Hoonhorst, Ingrid; Deliens, Gaétane; Gervais, Sarah J; Eberlen, Julia; Bayard, Clémence; Deltenre, Paul; Colin, Cécile; Klein, Olivier.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bernard, Philippe ; Rizzo, Tiziana ; Hoonhorst, Ingrid ; Deliens, Gaétane ; Gervais, Sarah J ; Eberlen, Julia ; Bayard, Clémence ; Deltenre, Paul ; Colin, Cécile ; Klein, Olivier. / The Neural Correlates of Cognitive Objectification : An ERP Study on the Body Inversion Effect Associated With Sexualized Bodies. In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2017.
@article{0bd5568fc0f246c88090060f9d4dba79,
title = "The Neural Correlates of Cognitive Objectification: An ERP Study on the Body Inversion Effect Associated With Sexualized Bodies",
abstract = "At an early stage of visual processing, human faces and bodies are typically associated with larger N170s when presented in an inverted (vs. upright) position, indexing the involvement of configural processing. We challenged this view and hypothesized that sexualized bodies would not be sensitive to inversion, thereby suggesting that they would be processed similarly to objects. Participants saw sexualized male and female bodies, nonsexualized male and female bodies, as well as objects in both upright and inverted positions while we recorded the N170. Results indicated that inverted (vs. upright) nonsexualized male and female bodies were associated with larger N170 amplitudes. In contrast, no N170 amplitude inversion effect emerged for sexualized male and female bodies or objects. These results suggest that sexualized bodies are processed similarly to objects and quite differently than nonsexualized bodies. We discuss the results and their implications in the light of the literatures in person perception and objectification.",
keywords = "body inversion, cognitive neuroscience, configural and analytic processing, dehumanization, N170, objectification, psychophysiology, sexualization, social neuroscience",
author = "Philippe Bernard and Tiziana Rizzo and Ingrid Hoonhorst and Ga{\'e}tane Deliens and Gervais, {Sarah J} and Julia Eberlen and Cl{\'e}mence Bayard and Paul Deltenre and C{\'e}cile Colin and Olivier Klein",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1948550617714582",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Neural Correlates of Cognitive Objectification

T2 - An ERP Study on the Body Inversion Effect Associated With Sexualized Bodies

AU - Bernard, Philippe

AU - Rizzo, Tiziana

AU - Hoonhorst, Ingrid

AU - Deliens, Gaétane

AU - Gervais, Sarah J

AU - Eberlen, Julia

AU - Bayard, Clémence

AU - Deltenre, Paul

AU - Colin, Cécile

AU - Klein, Olivier

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - At an early stage of visual processing, human faces and bodies are typically associated with larger N170s when presented in an inverted (vs. upright) position, indexing the involvement of configural processing. We challenged this view and hypothesized that sexualized bodies would not be sensitive to inversion, thereby suggesting that they would be processed similarly to objects. Participants saw sexualized male and female bodies, nonsexualized male and female bodies, as well as objects in both upright and inverted positions while we recorded the N170. Results indicated that inverted (vs. upright) nonsexualized male and female bodies were associated with larger N170 amplitudes. In contrast, no N170 amplitude inversion effect emerged for sexualized male and female bodies or objects. These results suggest that sexualized bodies are processed similarly to objects and quite differently than nonsexualized bodies. We discuss the results and their implications in the light of the literatures in person perception and objectification.

AB - At an early stage of visual processing, human faces and bodies are typically associated with larger N170s when presented in an inverted (vs. upright) position, indexing the involvement of configural processing. We challenged this view and hypothesized that sexualized bodies would not be sensitive to inversion, thereby suggesting that they would be processed similarly to objects. Participants saw sexualized male and female bodies, nonsexualized male and female bodies, as well as objects in both upright and inverted positions while we recorded the N170. Results indicated that inverted (vs. upright) nonsexualized male and female bodies were associated with larger N170 amplitudes. In contrast, no N170 amplitude inversion effect emerged for sexualized male and female bodies or objects. These results suggest that sexualized bodies are processed similarly to objects and quite differently than nonsexualized bodies. We discuss the results and their implications in the light of the literatures in person perception and objectification.

KW - body inversion

KW - cognitive neuroscience

KW - configural and analytic processing

KW - dehumanization

KW - N170

KW - objectification

KW - psychophysiology

KW - sexualization

KW - social neuroscience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037635078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037635078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1948550617714582

DO - 10.1177/1948550617714582

M3 - Article

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

ER -