The need for additional procedures in patients undergoing proximal hypospadias repairs as reported in the pediatric health information system database

Katherine W. Herbst, Fernando A. Ferrer, John H. Makari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Using administrative data from freestanding pediatric hospitals in the United States, we characterized the frequency and type of additional procedures required in patients undergoing proximal hypospadias repair in a larger cohort than in published case series across multiple surgeons and institutions. Materials and Methods A search of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database by CPT code between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2010 identified patients undergoing 1 or 2-stage repair for proximal hypospadias. Patient records with inconsistent coding or the suggestion of an alternate pathological condition were excluded from study. A forward query to June 30, 2011 identified additional hypospadias related interventions by CPT codes. Results We identified 1,679 patients from a total of 37 hospitals. Potential followup was 1 to 6.5 years. One-stage repair was performed in 85.7% of patients at a median age of 10 months. In patients undergoing 2-stage repair the median age at initial repair was 10 months and the median interval between stages was 6 months. Of all patients 26.2% required 1 or more additional interventions beyond definitive repair. Of all additional interventions 84.0% were open, 7.2% were endoscopic treatment for stricture, 0.4% were combined endoscopic and open interventions, and 8.4% were endoscopic evaluation. The median interval from definitive repair to the first intervention was 9 months. Conclusions These data indicate that more than a quarter of patients who underwent proximal hypospadias repair at pediatric hospitals required additional intervention(s) after what was thought to be definitive repair. These data help create a broader context in a contemporary cohort of patients treated with proximal hypospadias repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1550-1555
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume190
Issue number4 SUPPL
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Health Information Systems
Hypospadias
Databases
Pediatrics
Current Procedural Terminology
Pediatric Hospitals
Pathologic Constriction

Keywords

  • endoscopy
  • hypospadias
  • reconstructive surgical procedures
  • reoperation
  • urethra

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

The need for additional procedures in patients undergoing proximal hypospadias repairs as reported in the pediatric health information system database. / Herbst, Katherine W.; Ferrer, Fernando A.; Makari, John H.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 190, No. 4 SUPPL, 10.2013, p. 1550-1555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{98d5483cb2114fa69f20a1bd9a64aa02,
title = "The need for additional procedures in patients undergoing proximal hypospadias repairs as reported in the pediatric health information system database",
abstract = "Purpose Using administrative data from freestanding pediatric hospitals in the United States, we characterized the frequency and type of additional procedures required in patients undergoing proximal hypospadias repair in a larger cohort than in published case series across multiple surgeons and institutions. Materials and Methods A search of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database by CPT code between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2010 identified patients undergoing 1 or 2-stage repair for proximal hypospadias. Patient records with inconsistent coding or the suggestion of an alternate pathological condition were excluded from study. A forward query to June 30, 2011 identified additional hypospadias related interventions by CPT codes. Results We identified 1,679 patients from a total of 37 hospitals. Potential followup was 1 to 6.5 years. One-stage repair was performed in 85.7{\%} of patients at a median age of 10 months. In patients undergoing 2-stage repair the median age at initial repair was 10 months and the median interval between stages was 6 months. Of all patients 26.2{\%} required 1 or more additional interventions beyond definitive repair. Of all additional interventions 84.0{\%} were open, 7.2{\%} were endoscopic treatment for stricture, 0.4{\%} were combined endoscopic and open interventions, and 8.4{\%} were endoscopic evaluation. The median interval from definitive repair to the first intervention was 9 months. Conclusions These data indicate that more than a quarter of patients who underwent proximal hypospadias repair at pediatric hospitals required additional intervention(s) after what was thought to be definitive repair. These data help create a broader context in a contemporary cohort of patients treated with proximal hypospadias repair.",
keywords = "endoscopy, hypospadias, reconstructive surgical procedures, reoperation, urethra",
author = "Herbst, {Katherine W.} and Ferrer, {Fernando A.} and Makari, {John H.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "190",
pages = "1550--1555",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4 SUPPL",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need for additional procedures in patients undergoing proximal hypospadias repairs as reported in the pediatric health information system database

AU - Herbst, Katherine W.

AU - Ferrer, Fernando A.

AU - Makari, John H.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Purpose Using administrative data from freestanding pediatric hospitals in the United States, we characterized the frequency and type of additional procedures required in patients undergoing proximal hypospadias repair in a larger cohort than in published case series across multiple surgeons and institutions. Materials and Methods A search of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database by CPT code between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2010 identified patients undergoing 1 or 2-stage repair for proximal hypospadias. Patient records with inconsistent coding or the suggestion of an alternate pathological condition were excluded from study. A forward query to June 30, 2011 identified additional hypospadias related interventions by CPT codes. Results We identified 1,679 patients from a total of 37 hospitals. Potential followup was 1 to 6.5 years. One-stage repair was performed in 85.7% of patients at a median age of 10 months. In patients undergoing 2-stage repair the median age at initial repair was 10 months and the median interval between stages was 6 months. Of all patients 26.2% required 1 or more additional interventions beyond definitive repair. Of all additional interventions 84.0% were open, 7.2% were endoscopic treatment for stricture, 0.4% were combined endoscopic and open interventions, and 8.4% were endoscopic evaluation. The median interval from definitive repair to the first intervention was 9 months. Conclusions These data indicate that more than a quarter of patients who underwent proximal hypospadias repair at pediatric hospitals required additional intervention(s) after what was thought to be definitive repair. These data help create a broader context in a contemporary cohort of patients treated with proximal hypospadias repair.

AB - Purpose Using administrative data from freestanding pediatric hospitals in the United States, we characterized the frequency and type of additional procedures required in patients undergoing proximal hypospadias repair in a larger cohort than in published case series across multiple surgeons and institutions. Materials and Methods A search of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database by CPT code between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2010 identified patients undergoing 1 or 2-stage repair for proximal hypospadias. Patient records with inconsistent coding or the suggestion of an alternate pathological condition were excluded from study. A forward query to June 30, 2011 identified additional hypospadias related interventions by CPT codes. Results We identified 1,679 patients from a total of 37 hospitals. Potential followup was 1 to 6.5 years. One-stage repair was performed in 85.7% of patients at a median age of 10 months. In patients undergoing 2-stage repair the median age at initial repair was 10 months and the median interval between stages was 6 months. Of all patients 26.2% required 1 or more additional interventions beyond definitive repair. Of all additional interventions 84.0% were open, 7.2% were endoscopic treatment for stricture, 0.4% were combined endoscopic and open interventions, and 8.4% were endoscopic evaluation. The median interval from definitive repair to the first intervention was 9 months. Conclusions These data indicate that more than a quarter of patients who underwent proximal hypospadias repair at pediatric hospitals required additional intervention(s) after what was thought to be definitive repair. These data help create a broader context in a contemporary cohort of patients treated with proximal hypospadias repair.

KW - endoscopy

KW - hypospadias

KW - reconstructive surgical procedures

KW - reoperation

KW - urethra

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883767324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883767324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.029

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 23434940

AN - SCOPUS:84883767324

VL - 190

SP - 1550

EP - 1555

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4 SUPPL

ER -