The naphthalene state of the science symposium

Objectives, organization, structure, and charge

Richard B. Belzer, James S. Bus, Ercole Cavalieri, Steven C. Lewis, D. Warner North, Richard C. Pleus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This report provides a summary of the objectives, organization, structure and charge for the naphthalene state of the science symposium (NS3), Monterey, CA, October 9-12, 2006. A 1-day preliminary conference was held followed by a 3-day state of the science symposium covering four topics judged by the Planning Committee to be crucial for developing valid and reliable scientific estimates of low-dose human cancer risk from naphthalene. The Planning Committee reviewed the relevant scientific literature to identify singularly knowledgeable researchers and a pool of scientists qualified to serve as expert panelists. In two cases, independent scientists were commissioned to develop comprehensive reviews of the relevant science in a specific area for which no leading researcher could be identified. Researchers and expert panelists alike were screened for conflicts of interest. All policy issues related to risk assessment practices and risk management were scrupulously excluded. NS3 was novel in several ways and provides an innovative model for the effective use of peer review to identify scientific uncertainties and propose research strategies for reducing or eliminating them prior to the conduct of risk assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Volume51
Issue number2 SUPLL
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Risk assessment
Research Personnel
Organizations
Planning
Risk management
Literature
Conflict of Interest
Peer Review
Practice Management
Risk Management
Uncertainty
Research
naphthalene
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Information quality
  • Naphthalene
  • Peer review
  • Peer review charge
  • Peer review objectives
  • Peer review organization
  • Peer review structure
  • Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology

Cite this

The naphthalene state of the science symposium : Objectives, organization, structure, and charge. / Belzer, Richard B.; Bus, James S.; Cavalieri, Ercole; Lewis, Steven C.; North, D. Warner; Pleus, Richard C.

In: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 51, No. 2 SUPLL, 01.01.2008, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Belzer, Richard B. ; Bus, James S. ; Cavalieri, Ercole ; Lewis, Steven C. ; North, D. Warner ; Pleus, Richard C. / The naphthalene state of the science symposium : Objectives, organization, structure, and charge. In: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2008 ; Vol. 51, No. 2 SUPLL. pp. 1-5.
@article{ba3a6f82525840b094973d5306f7651c,
title = "The naphthalene state of the science symposium: Objectives, organization, structure, and charge",
abstract = "This report provides a summary of the objectives, organization, structure and charge for the naphthalene state of the science symposium (NS3), Monterey, CA, October 9-12, 2006. A 1-day preliminary conference was held followed by a 3-day state of the science symposium covering four topics judged by the Planning Committee to be crucial for developing valid and reliable scientific estimates of low-dose human cancer risk from naphthalene. The Planning Committee reviewed the relevant scientific literature to identify singularly knowledgeable researchers and a pool of scientists qualified to serve as expert panelists. In two cases, independent scientists were commissioned to develop comprehensive reviews of the relevant science in a specific area for which no leading researcher could be identified. Researchers and expert panelists alike were screened for conflicts of interest. All policy issues related to risk assessment practices and risk management were scrupulously excluded. NS3 was novel in several ways and provides an innovative model for the effective use of peer review to identify scientific uncertainties and propose research strategies for reducing or eliminating them prior to the conduct of risk assessment.",
keywords = "Information quality, Naphthalene, Peer review, Peer review charge, Peer review objectives, Peer review organization, Peer review structure, Risk assessment",
author = "Belzer, {Richard B.} and Bus, {James S.} and Ercole Cavalieri and Lewis, {Steven C.} and North, {D. Warner} and Pleus, {Richard C.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology",
issn = "0273-2300",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2 SUPLL",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The naphthalene state of the science symposium

T2 - Objectives, organization, structure, and charge

AU - Belzer, Richard B.

AU - Bus, James S.

AU - Cavalieri, Ercole

AU - Lewis, Steven C.

AU - North, D. Warner

AU - Pleus, Richard C.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - This report provides a summary of the objectives, organization, structure and charge for the naphthalene state of the science symposium (NS3), Monterey, CA, October 9-12, 2006. A 1-day preliminary conference was held followed by a 3-day state of the science symposium covering four topics judged by the Planning Committee to be crucial for developing valid and reliable scientific estimates of low-dose human cancer risk from naphthalene. The Planning Committee reviewed the relevant scientific literature to identify singularly knowledgeable researchers and a pool of scientists qualified to serve as expert panelists. In two cases, independent scientists were commissioned to develop comprehensive reviews of the relevant science in a specific area for which no leading researcher could be identified. Researchers and expert panelists alike were screened for conflicts of interest. All policy issues related to risk assessment practices and risk management were scrupulously excluded. NS3 was novel in several ways and provides an innovative model for the effective use of peer review to identify scientific uncertainties and propose research strategies for reducing or eliminating them prior to the conduct of risk assessment.

AB - This report provides a summary of the objectives, organization, structure and charge for the naphthalene state of the science symposium (NS3), Monterey, CA, October 9-12, 2006. A 1-day preliminary conference was held followed by a 3-day state of the science symposium covering four topics judged by the Planning Committee to be crucial for developing valid and reliable scientific estimates of low-dose human cancer risk from naphthalene. The Planning Committee reviewed the relevant scientific literature to identify singularly knowledgeable researchers and a pool of scientists qualified to serve as expert panelists. In two cases, independent scientists were commissioned to develop comprehensive reviews of the relevant science in a specific area for which no leading researcher could be identified. Researchers and expert panelists alike were screened for conflicts of interest. All policy issues related to risk assessment practices and risk management were scrupulously excluded. NS3 was novel in several ways and provides an innovative model for the effective use of peer review to identify scientific uncertainties and propose research strategies for reducing or eliminating them prior to the conduct of risk assessment.

KW - Information quality

KW - Naphthalene

KW - Peer review

KW - Peer review charge

KW - Peer review objectives

KW - Peer review organization

KW - Peer review structure

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649201446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44649201446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.017

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

JF - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

SN - 0273-2300

IS - 2 SUPLL

ER -