The metabolic costs of reciprocal supersets vs. traditional resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults

Andrew R. Kelleher, Kyle J. Hackney, Timothy J. Fairchild, Stefan Keslacy, Lori L. Ploutz-Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An acute bout of traditional resistance training (TRAD) increases energy expenditure (EE) both during exercise and in the postexercise period. Reciprocal supersets (SUPERs) are a method of resistance training that alternates multiple sets of high-intensity agonist-antagonist muscle groups with limited recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the energy cost of SUPERs and TRAD both during and in the postexercise period. We hypothesized that SUPERs would produce greater exercise EE relative to the duration of exercise time and greater excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) than TRAD of matched work. Ten recreationally active, young men each participated in 2 exercise protocols: SUPER, followed 1 week later by TRAD matched within using a 10-repetition maximum load for 6 exercises, 4 sets, and repetitions. Participants were measured for oxygen consumption and blood lactate concentration during exercise and 60 minutes postexercise after each exercise bout. No significant differences were observed in aerobic exercise EE between trials (SUPER 1,009.99 ± 71.42 kJ; TRAD 954.49 ± 83.31 kJ); however, when expressed relative to time, the exercise EE was significantly greater during SUPER (34.70 ± 2.97 kJ·min-1) than TRAD (26.28 ± 2.43 kJ·min-1). Excess postexercise oxygen consumption was significantly greater after SUPER (79.36 ± 7.49 kJ) over TRAD (59.67 ± 8.37 kJ). Average blood lactate measures were significantly greater during SUPER (5.1 ± 0.9 mmol·L-1) than during TRAD (3.8 ± 0.6 mmol·L-1). Reciprocal supersets produced greater exercise kJ·min-1, blood lactate, and EPOC than did TRAD. Incorporating this method of resistance exercise may benefit exercisers attempting to increase EE and have a fixed exercise volume with limited exercise time available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1043-1051
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

Exercise
Costs and Cost Analysis
Energy Metabolism
Oxygen Consumption
Lactic Acid
Resistance Training
Muscles

Keywords

  • Agonist-antagonist
  • EPOC
  • Energy expenditure
  • Weight training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

The metabolic costs of reciprocal supersets vs. traditional resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults. / Kelleher, Andrew R.; Hackney, Kyle J.; Fairchild, Timothy J.; Keslacy, Stefan; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.

In: Journal of strength and conditioning research, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 1043-1051.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kelleher, Andrew R. ; Hackney, Kyle J. ; Fairchild, Timothy J. ; Keslacy, Stefan ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. / The metabolic costs of reciprocal supersets vs. traditional resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults. In: Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 1043-1051.
@article{fb616d99a078408783d07df6fa2c0091,
title = "The metabolic costs of reciprocal supersets vs. traditional resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults",
abstract = "An acute bout of traditional resistance training (TRAD) increases energy expenditure (EE) both during exercise and in the postexercise period. Reciprocal supersets (SUPERs) are a method of resistance training that alternates multiple sets of high-intensity agonist-antagonist muscle groups with limited recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the energy cost of SUPERs and TRAD both during and in the postexercise period. We hypothesized that SUPERs would produce greater exercise EE relative to the duration of exercise time and greater excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) than TRAD of matched work. Ten recreationally active, young men each participated in 2 exercise protocols: SUPER, followed 1 week later by TRAD matched within using a 10-repetition maximum load for 6 exercises, 4 sets, and repetitions. Participants were measured for oxygen consumption and blood lactate concentration during exercise and 60 minutes postexercise after each exercise bout. No significant differences were observed in aerobic exercise EE between trials (SUPER 1,009.99 ± 71.42 kJ; TRAD 954.49 ± 83.31 kJ); however, when expressed relative to time, the exercise EE was significantly greater during SUPER (34.70 ± 2.97 kJ·min-1) than TRAD (26.28 ± 2.43 kJ·min-1). Excess postexercise oxygen consumption was significantly greater after SUPER (79.36 ± 7.49 kJ) over TRAD (59.67 ± 8.37 kJ). Average blood lactate measures were significantly greater during SUPER (5.1 ± 0.9 mmol·L-1) than during TRAD (3.8 ± 0.6 mmol·L-1). Reciprocal supersets produced greater exercise kJ·min-1, blood lactate, and EPOC than did TRAD. Incorporating this method of resistance exercise may benefit exercisers attempting to increase EE and have a fixed exercise volume with limited exercise time available.",
keywords = "Agonist-antagonist, EPOC, Energy expenditure, Weight training",
author = "Kelleher, {Andrew R.} and Hackney, {Kyle J.} and Fairchild, {Timothy J.} and Stefan Keslacy and Ploutz-Snyder, {Lori L.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d3e993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1043--1051",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The metabolic costs of reciprocal supersets vs. traditional resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults

AU - Kelleher, Andrew R.

AU - Hackney, Kyle J.

AU - Fairchild, Timothy J.

AU - Keslacy, Stefan

AU - Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - An acute bout of traditional resistance training (TRAD) increases energy expenditure (EE) both during exercise and in the postexercise period. Reciprocal supersets (SUPERs) are a method of resistance training that alternates multiple sets of high-intensity agonist-antagonist muscle groups with limited recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the energy cost of SUPERs and TRAD both during and in the postexercise period. We hypothesized that SUPERs would produce greater exercise EE relative to the duration of exercise time and greater excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) than TRAD of matched work. Ten recreationally active, young men each participated in 2 exercise protocols: SUPER, followed 1 week later by TRAD matched within using a 10-repetition maximum load for 6 exercises, 4 sets, and repetitions. Participants were measured for oxygen consumption and blood lactate concentration during exercise and 60 minutes postexercise after each exercise bout. No significant differences were observed in aerobic exercise EE between trials (SUPER 1,009.99 ± 71.42 kJ; TRAD 954.49 ± 83.31 kJ); however, when expressed relative to time, the exercise EE was significantly greater during SUPER (34.70 ± 2.97 kJ·min-1) than TRAD (26.28 ± 2.43 kJ·min-1). Excess postexercise oxygen consumption was significantly greater after SUPER (79.36 ± 7.49 kJ) over TRAD (59.67 ± 8.37 kJ). Average blood lactate measures were significantly greater during SUPER (5.1 ± 0.9 mmol·L-1) than during TRAD (3.8 ± 0.6 mmol·L-1). Reciprocal supersets produced greater exercise kJ·min-1, blood lactate, and EPOC than did TRAD. Incorporating this method of resistance exercise may benefit exercisers attempting to increase EE and have a fixed exercise volume with limited exercise time available.

AB - An acute bout of traditional resistance training (TRAD) increases energy expenditure (EE) both during exercise and in the postexercise period. Reciprocal supersets (SUPERs) are a method of resistance training that alternates multiple sets of high-intensity agonist-antagonist muscle groups with limited recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the energy cost of SUPERs and TRAD both during and in the postexercise period. We hypothesized that SUPERs would produce greater exercise EE relative to the duration of exercise time and greater excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) than TRAD of matched work. Ten recreationally active, young men each participated in 2 exercise protocols: SUPER, followed 1 week later by TRAD matched within using a 10-repetition maximum load for 6 exercises, 4 sets, and repetitions. Participants were measured for oxygen consumption and blood lactate concentration during exercise and 60 minutes postexercise after each exercise bout. No significant differences were observed in aerobic exercise EE between trials (SUPER 1,009.99 ± 71.42 kJ; TRAD 954.49 ± 83.31 kJ); however, when expressed relative to time, the exercise EE was significantly greater during SUPER (34.70 ± 2.97 kJ·min-1) than TRAD (26.28 ± 2.43 kJ·min-1). Excess postexercise oxygen consumption was significantly greater after SUPER (79.36 ± 7.49 kJ) over TRAD (59.67 ± 8.37 kJ). Average blood lactate measures were significantly greater during SUPER (5.1 ± 0.9 mmol·L-1) than during TRAD (3.8 ± 0.6 mmol·L-1). Reciprocal supersets produced greater exercise kJ·min-1, blood lactate, and EPOC than did TRAD. Incorporating this method of resistance exercise may benefit exercisers attempting to increase EE and have a fixed exercise volume with limited exercise time available.

KW - Agonist-antagonist

KW - EPOC

KW - Energy expenditure

KW - Weight training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950672918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950672918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d3e993

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d3e993

M3 - Article

C2 - 20300020

AN - SCOPUS:77950672918

VL - 24

SP - 1043

EP - 1051

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 4

ER -