The medical model to block eligibility for students with EBD: A response-to-intervention alternative

John W. Maag, Antonis Katsiyannis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main tenant of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) reauthorization was improving student outcomes through the use of evidence-based interventions. A particularly interesting aspect that found its way into the legislation was the eligibility process. Current methods of eligibility identification for students with learning disabilities (LD) and emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) were criticized as being invalid and resulting in overidentification. In the case of LD, a response-to-intervention (RTI) approach was adapted as one of the methods for determining eligibility. In the case of EBD (as well as LD), the recommendation was to use the medical model for making eligibility decisions (i.e., diagnosis by a physician). Although it did not become part of IDEA 2004, it will likely be reintroduced in the next reauthorization. The purpose of this article is to provide a critique of the medical model to make eligibility decisions and point out its potential paradoxical results. A model of RTI is then presented for making EBD eligibility decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-194
Number of pages11
JournalBehavioral Disorders
Volume33
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
learning disability
Students
disability
act
Education
student
Legislation
Decision Making
education
legislation
physician
Physicians
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The medical model to block eligibility for students with EBD : A response-to-intervention alternative. / Maag, John W.; Katsiyannis, Antonis.

In: Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.05.2008, p. 184-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a262205d394143a7b56c82f3139d9a2b,
title = "The medical model to block eligibility for students with EBD: A response-to-intervention alternative",
abstract = "The main tenant of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) reauthorization was improving student outcomes through the use of evidence-based interventions. A particularly interesting aspect that found its way into the legislation was the eligibility process. Current methods of eligibility identification for students with learning disabilities (LD) and emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) were criticized as being invalid and resulting in overidentification. In the case of LD, a response-to-intervention (RTI) approach was adapted as one of the methods for determining eligibility. In the case of EBD (as well as LD), the recommendation was to use the medical model for making eligibility decisions (i.e., diagnosis by a physician). Although it did not become part of IDEA 2004, it will likely be reintroduced in the next reauthorization. The purpose of this article is to provide a critique of the medical model to make eligibility decisions and point out its potential paradoxical results. A model of RTI is then presented for making EBD eligibility decisions.",
author = "Maag, {John W.} and Antonis Katsiyannis",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "184--194",
journal = "Behavioral Disorders",
issn = "0198-7429",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The medical model to block eligibility for students with EBD

T2 - A response-to-intervention alternative

AU - Maag, John W.

AU - Katsiyannis, Antonis

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - The main tenant of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) reauthorization was improving student outcomes through the use of evidence-based interventions. A particularly interesting aspect that found its way into the legislation was the eligibility process. Current methods of eligibility identification for students with learning disabilities (LD) and emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) were criticized as being invalid and resulting in overidentification. In the case of LD, a response-to-intervention (RTI) approach was adapted as one of the methods for determining eligibility. In the case of EBD (as well as LD), the recommendation was to use the medical model for making eligibility decisions (i.e., diagnosis by a physician). Although it did not become part of IDEA 2004, it will likely be reintroduced in the next reauthorization. The purpose of this article is to provide a critique of the medical model to make eligibility decisions and point out its potential paradoxical results. A model of RTI is then presented for making EBD eligibility decisions.

AB - The main tenant of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) reauthorization was improving student outcomes through the use of evidence-based interventions. A particularly interesting aspect that found its way into the legislation was the eligibility process. Current methods of eligibility identification for students with learning disabilities (LD) and emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) were criticized as being invalid and resulting in overidentification. In the case of LD, a response-to-intervention (RTI) approach was adapted as one of the methods for determining eligibility. In the case of EBD (as well as LD), the recommendation was to use the medical model for making eligibility decisions (i.e., diagnosis by a physician). Although it did not become part of IDEA 2004, it will likely be reintroduced in the next reauthorization. The purpose of this article is to provide a critique of the medical model to make eligibility decisions and point out its potential paradoxical results. A model of RTI is then presented for making EBD eligibility decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650105201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650105201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78650105201

VL - 33

SP - 184

EP - 194

JO - Behavioral Disorders

JF - Behavioral Disorders

SN - 0198-7429

IS - 3

ER -