The mean ventricular fibrillation cycle length: A potentially useful parameter for programming implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Huagui Li, Arthur R Easley Jr, John Robert Windle, Daniela Samoil, William Barrington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In programming the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection cycle length (CL) is based on the CL of the documented tachycardia but the ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection CL is set arbitrarily. Appropriate programming of VF detection may not only reduce the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks for non-VF rhythms but can also avoid the fatal under-detection of VF. The mean VFCL may provide a useful parameter for optimal ICD programming for VF detection if it is reproducible. This study examined the intrapatient reproducibility and interpatient variation of the mean VFCL in 30 ICD patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age 63 ± 13 years). A total of 210 VF episodes (7 ± 4 per patient, range 3-17)induced by T-wave shocks (166) or AC (44) at the ICD implant (30 patients) and the predischarge test (12 of 30 patients) were analyzed. The mean VFCL was calculated from the stored V-V intervals in the ICDs. Although the mean VFCL varied significantly from 171 ± 6 to 263 ± 11 ms (P < 0.01) among different patients, it was reproducible among different VF episodes in an individual patient (maximal variation 4-50 ms, P > 0.05). The mean VFCL was not significantly different between patients with and without antiarrhythmic drugs (210 ± 32 vs 210 ± 23 ms, P > 0.05) and was correlated with the ventricular effective refractory period (r = 0.5, P < 0.05). The mean VFCL varies greatly among different patients but remains reproducible in an individual patient, suggesting that the mean VFCL may serve as a reference for ICD programming of VF detection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1789-1794
Number of pages6
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 17 1998

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Ventricular Fibrillation
Shock
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
Ventricular Tachycardia
Tachycardia
Incidence

Keywords

  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Ventricular fibrillation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

The mean ventricular fibrillation cycle length : A potentially useful parameter for programming implantable cardioverter defibrillators. / Li, Huagui; Easley Jr, Arthur R; Windle, John Robert; Samoil, Daniela; Barrington, William.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 21, No. 9, 17.09.1998, p. 1789-1794.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0bd004ab64949d591dd868cb9c36e27,
title = "The mean ventricular fibrillation cycle length: A potentially useful parameter for programming implantable cardioverter defibrillators",
abstract = "In programming the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection cycle length (CL) is based on the CL of the documented tachycardia but the ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection CL is set arbitrarily. Appropriate programming of VF detection may not only reduce the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks for non-VF rhythms but can also avoid the fatal under-detection of VF. The mean VFCL may provide a useful parameter for optimal ICD programming for VF detection if it is reproducible. This study examined the intrapatient reproducibility and interpatient variation of the mean VFCL in 30 ICD patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age 63 ± 13 years). A total of 210 VF episodes (7 ± 4 per patient, range 3-17)induced by T-wave shocks (166) or AC (44) at the ICD implant (30 patients) and the predischarge test (12 of 30 patients) were analyzed. The mean VFCL was calculated from the stored V-V intervals in the ICDs. Although the mean VFCL varied significantly from 171 ± 6 to 263 ± 11 ms (P < 0.01) among different patients, it was reproducible among different VF episodes in an individual patient (maximal variation 4-50 ms, P > 0.05). The mean VFCL was not significantly different between patients with and without antiarrhythmic drugs (210 ± 32 vs 210 ± 23 ms, P > 0.05) and was correlated with the ventricular effective refractory period (r = 0.5, P < 0.05). The mean VFCL varies greatly among different patients but remains reproducible in an individual patient, suggesting that the mean VFCL may serve as a reference for ICD programming of VF detection.",
keywords = "Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Ventricular fibrillation",
author = "Huagui Li and {Easley Jr}, {Arthur R} and Windle, {John Robert} and Daniela Samoil and William Barrington",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00280.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1789--1794",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The mean ventricular fibrillation cycle length

T2 - A potentially useful parameter for programming implantable cardioverter defibrillators

AU - Li, Huagui

AU - Easley Jr, Arthur R

AU - Windle, John Robert

AU - Samoil, Daniela

AU - Barrington, William

PY - 1998/9/17

Y1 - 1998/9/17

N2 - In programming the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection cycle length (CL) is based on the CL of the documented tachycardia but the ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection CL is set arbitrarily. Appropriate programming of VF detection may not only reduce the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks for non-VF rhythms but can also avoid the fatal under-detection of VF. The mean VFCL may provide a useful parameter for optimal ICD programming for VF detection if it is reproducible. This study examined the intrapatient reproducibility and interpatient variation of the mean VFCL in 30 ICD patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age 63 ± 13 years). A total of 210 VF episodes (7 ± 4 per patient, range 3-17)induced by T-wave shocks (166) or AC (44) at the ICD implant (30 patients) and the predischarge test (12 of 30 patients) were analyzed. The mean VFCL was calculated from the stored V-V intervals in the ICDs. Although the mean VFCL varied significantly from 171 ± 6 to 263 ± 11 ms (P < 0.01) among different patients, it was reproducible among different VF episodes in an individual patient (maximal variation 4-50 ms, P > 0.05). The mean VFCL was not significantly different between patients with and without antiarrhythmic drugs (210 ± 32 vs 210 ± 23 ms, P > 0.05) and was correlated with the ventricular effective refractory period (r = 0.5, P < 0.05). The mean VFCL varies greatly among different patients but remains reproducible in an individual patient, suggesting that the mean VFCL may serve as a reference for ICD programming of VF detection.

AB - In programming the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection cycle length (CL) is based on the CL of the documented tachycardia but the ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection CL is set arbitrarily. Appropriate programming of VF detection may not only reduce the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks for non-VF rhythms but can also avoid the fatal under-detection of VF. The mean VFCL may provide a useful parameter for optimal ICD programming for VF detection if it is reproducible. This study examined the intrapatient reproducibility and interpatient variation of the mean VFCL in 30 ICD patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age 63 ± 13 years). A total of 210 VF episodes (7 ± 4 per patient, range 3-17)induced by T-wave shocks (166) or AC (44) at the ICD implant (30 patients) and the predischarge test (12 of 30 patients) were analyzed. The mean VFCL was calculated from the stored V-V intervals in the ICDs. Although the mean VFCL varied significantly from 171 ± 6 to 263 ± 11 ms (P < 0.01) among different patients, it was reproducible among different VF episodes in an individual patient (maximal variation 4-50 ms, P > 0.05). The mean VFCL was not significantly different between patients with and without antiarrhythmic drugs (210 ± 32 vs 210 ± 23 ms, P > 0.05) and was correlated with the ventricular effective refractory period (r = 0.5, P < 0.05). The mean VFCL varies greatly among different patients but remains reproducible in an individual patient, suggesting that the mean VFCL may serve as a reference for ICD programming of VF detection.

KW - Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

KW - Ventricular fibrillation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031664335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031664335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00280.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00280.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 9744444

AN - SCOPUS:0031664335

VL - 21

SP - 1789

EP - 1794

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 9

ER -