The Lives of Others

Social Rationality in Animals

Jeffrey R Stevens, Andrew J. King

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why do animals attend to the lives of others? Social situations have provided important pressures in the evolution of behavior. In fact, some have argued that the complexities of social life require sophisticated mental abilities such that individuals of highly social species will evolve intelligent ways to cope with this complexity. The chapter explores three key components critical for social decision making. First, although the social milieu might be complex and ever changing, the use of simple decision mechanisms such as heuristics or "rules of thumb" may allow animals to navigate this complexity. Simple rules can provide good responses to complex problems. Reasonable decision mechanisms cannot be developed without considering the requisite cognitive capacities needed to implement these mechanisms. For example, investigating these cognitive capacities has been useful in reassessing the decision mechanisms used in cooperative situations. Finally, the animal literature is particularly useful for testing questions of ecological rationality-where decision rules are adapted to the structure of the physical and social environment-because different species have evolved in different environments. Each species' environment may uniquely shape its decision processes, and the social environment is a particularly important selective force on decision making. In summary, decision mechanisms, cognitive capacities, and the environment of a species must be investigated to understand properly its decisions. This perspective integrates the evolutionary and cognitive study of decision making to explore how animals navigate the complexities of their social worlds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSimple Heuristics in a Social World
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199950089
ISBN (Print)9780195388435
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 2013

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Social Environment
Aptitude
Pressure
Heuristics

Keywords

  • Animal cognition
  • Cognitive capacities
  • Cooperation
  • Ecological rationality
  • Group decision making
  • Reciprocity
  • Rules of thumb
  • Social brain
  • Tit-for-tat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Stevens, J. R., & King, A. J. (2013). The Lives of Others: Social Rationality in Animals. In Simple Heuristics in a Social World Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015

The Lives of Others : Social Rationality in Animals. / Stevens, Jeffrey R; King, Andrew J.

Simple Heuristics in a Social World. Oxford University Press, 2013.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Stevens, JR & King, AJ 2013, The Lives of Others: Social Rationality in Animals. in Simple Heuristics in a Social World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015
Stevens JR, King AJ. The Lives of Others: Social Rationality in Animals. In Simple Heuristics in a Social World. Oxford University Press. 2013 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015
Stevens, Jeffrey R ; King, Andrew J. / The Lives of Others : Social Rationality in Animals. Simple Heuristics in a Social World. Oxford University Press, 2013.
@inbook{5b086b2bdb7f472fae2c38b85c2d3dd9,
title = "The Lives of Others: Social Rationality in Animals",
abstract = "Why do animals attend to the lives of others? Social situations have provided important pressures in the evolution of behavior. In fact, some have argued that the complexities of social life require sophisticated mental abilities such that individuals of highly social species will evolve intelligent ways to cope with this complexity. The chapter explores three key components critical for social decision making. First, although the social milieu might be complex and ever changing, the use of simple decision mechanisms such as heuristics or {"}rules of thumb{"} may allow animals to navigate this complexity. Simple rules can provide good responses to complex problems. Reasonable decision mechanisms cannot be developed without considering the requisite cognitive capacities needed to implement these mechanisms. For example, investigating these cognitive capacities has been useful in reassessing the decision mechanisms used in cooperative situations. Finally, the animal literature is particularly useful for testing questions of ecological rationality-where decision rules are adapted to the structure of the physical and social environment-because different species have evolved in different environments. Each species' environment may uniquely shape its decision processes, and the social environment is a particularly important selective force on decision making. In summary, decision mechanisms, cognitive capacities, and the environment of a species must be investigated to understand properly its decisions. This perspective integrates the evolutionary and cognitive study of decision making to explore how animals navigate the complexities of their social worlds.",
keywords = "Animal cognition, Cognitive capacities, Cooperation, Ecological rationality, Group decision making, Reciprocity, Rules of thumb, Social brain, Tit-for-tat",
author = "Stevens, {Jeffrey R} and King, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780195388435",
booktitle = "Simple Heuristics in a Social World",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Lives of Others

T2 - Social Rationality in Animals

AU - Stevens, Jeffrey R

AU - King, Andrew J.

PY - 2013/1/24

Y1 - 2013/1/24

N2 - Why do animals attend to the lives of others? Social situations have provided important pressures in the evolution of behavior. In fact, some have argued that the complexities of social life require sophisticated mental abilities such that individuals of highly social species will evolve intelligent ways to cope with this complexity. The chapter explores three key components critical for social decision making. First, although the social milieu might be complex and ever changing, the use of simple decision mechanisms such as heuristics or "rules of thumb" may allow animals to navigate this complexity. Simple rules can provide good responses to complex problems. Reasonable decision mechanisms cannot be developed without considering the requisite cognitive capacities needed to implement these mechanisms. For example, investigating these cognitive capacities has been useful in reassessing the decision mechanisms used in cooperative situations. Finally, the animal literature is particularly useful for testing questions of ecological rationality-where decision rules are adapted to the structure of the physical and social environment-because different species have evolved in different environments. Each species' environment may uniquely shape its decision processes, and the social environment is a particularly important selective force on decision making. In summary, decision mechanisms, cognitive capacities, and the environment of a species must be investigated to understand properly its decisions. This perspective integrates the evolutionary and cognitive study of decision making to explore how animals navigate the complexities of their social worlds.

AB - Why do animals attend to the lives of others? Social situations have provided important pressures in the evolution of behavior. In fact, some have argued that the complexities of social life require sophisticated mental abilities such that individuals of highly social species will evolve intelligent ways to cope with this complexity. The chapter explores three key components critical for social decision making. First, although the social milieu might be complex and ever changing, the use of simple decision mechanisms such as heuristics or "rules of thumb" may allow animals to navigate this complexity. Simple rules can provide good responses to complex problems. Reasonable decision mechanisms cannot be developed without considering the requisite cognitive capacities needed to implement these mechanisms. For example, investigating these cognitive capacities has been useful in reassessing the decision mechanisms used in cooperative situations. Finally, the animal literature is particularly useful for testing questions of ecological rationality-where decision rules are adapted to the structure of the physical and social environment-because different species have evolved in different environments. Each species' environment may uniquely shape its decision processes, and the social environment is a particularly important selective force on decision making. In summary, decision mechanisms, cognitive capacities, and the environment of a species must be investigated to understand properly its decisions. This perspective integrates the evolutionary and cognitive study of decision making to explore how animals navigate the complexities of their social worlds.

KW - Animal cognition

KW - Cognitive capacities

KW - Cooperation

KW - Ecological rationality

KW - Group decision making

KW - Reciprocity

KW - Rules of thumb

KW - Social brain

KW - Tit-for-tat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921640736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921640736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780195388435

BT - Simple Heuristics in a Social World

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -