The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude

Mark McCourt, Pierre Freeman, Cindi Tahmahkera-Stevens, Matthew Chaussee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various factors influence the degree of leftward error (pseudoneglect) (Bowers & Heilman, 1980) that typifies the performance of normal subjects in line bisection tasks (Jewell & McCourt, 2000). The results of this experiment show that unimanual responding also exerts a subtle but significant modulating influence on spatial attention, as indexed by the differential magnitude of pseudoneglect. Using a forced-choice tachistoscopic line bisection protocol, 184 subjects (92 male and 92 female) bisected horizontally oriented lines (22.3° wide X 0.39° height) presented to central vision in two conditions, in which bisection responses were executed via button presses using the first two fingers of either the left (LH) or right (RH) hand. Perceived line midpoint deviated significantly leftward of veridical (p < .05) in both conditions. There was no significant influence of subject sex (p > .05). A significant influence of animanual response was revealed (p < .05) where pseudoneglect magnitude was greater in the LH than the RH condition. The results are interpreted within the framework of the activationorientation theory of attentional asymmetry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-63
Number of pages12
JournalBrain and Cognition
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Fingers
Hand
Asymmetry
Experiment
Spatial Attention

Keywords

  • Line bisection
  • Pseudoneglect
  • Spatial attention
  • Unimanual

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude. / McCourt, Mark; Freeman, Pierre; Tahmahkera-Stevens, Cindi; Chaussee, Matthew.

In: Brain and Cognition, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 52-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCourt, M, Freeman, P, Tahmahkera-Stevens, C & Chaussee, M 2001, 'The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude', Brain and Cognition, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1255
McCourt, Mark ; Freeman, Pierre ; Tahmahkera-Stevens, Cindi ; Chaussee, Matthew. / The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude. In: Brain and Cognition. 2001 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 52-63.
@article{6fed7dc656bf4b79aa982960f18f2931,
title = "The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude",
abstract = "Various factors influence the degree of leftward error (pseudoneglect) (Bowers & Heilman, 1980) that typifies the performance of normal subjects in line bisection tasks (Jewell & McCourt, 2000). The results of this experiment show that unimanual responding also exerts a subtle but significant modulating influence on spatial attention, as indexed by the differential magnitude of pseudoneglect. Using a forced-choice tachistoscopic line bisection protocol, 184 subjects (92 male and 92 female) bisected horizontally oriented lines (22.3° wide X 0.39° height) presented to central vision in two conditions, in which bisection responses were executed via button presses using the first two fingers of either the left (LH) or right (RH) hand. Perceived line midpoint deviated significantly leftward of veridical (p < .05) in both conditions. There was no significant influence of subject sex (p > .05). A significant influence of animanual response was revealed (p < .05) where pseudoneglect magnitude was greater in the LH than the RH condition. The results are interpreted within the framework of the activationorientation theory of attentional asymmetry.",
keywords = "Line bisection, Pseudoneglect, Spatial attention, Unimanual",
author = "Mark McCourt and Pierre Freeman and Cindi Tahmahkera-Stevens and Matthew Chaussee",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/brcg.2000.1255",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "52--63",
journal = "Brain and Cognition",
issn = "0278-2626",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude

AU - McCourt, Mark

AU - Freeman, Pierre

AU - Tahmahkera-Stevens, Cindi

AU - Chaussee, Matthew

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Various factors influence the degree of leftward error (pseudoneglect) (Bowers & Heilman, 1980) that typifies the performance of normal subjects in line bisection tasks (Jewell & McCourt, 2000). The results of this experiment show that unimanual responding also exerts a subtle but significant modulating influence on spatial attention, as indexed by the differential magnitude of pseudoneglect. Using a forced-choice tachistoscopic line bisection protocol, 184 subjects (92 male and 92 female) bisected horizontally oriented lines (22.3° wide X 0.39° height) presented to central vision in two conditions, in which bisection responses were executed via button presses using the first two fingers of either the left (LH) or right (RH) hand. Perceived line midpoint deviated significantly leftward of veridical (p < .05) in both conditions. There was no significant influence of subject sex (p > .05). A significant influence of animanual response was revealed (p < .05) where pseudoneglect magnitude was greater in the LH than the RH condition. The results are interpreted within the framework of the activationorientation theory of attentional asymmetry.

AB - Various factors influence the degree of leftward error (pseudoneglect) (Bowers & Heilman, 1980) that typifies the performance of normal subjects in line bisection tasks (Jewell & McCourt, 2000). The results of this experiment show that unimanual responding also exerts a subtle but significant modulating influence on spatial attention, as indexed by the differential magnitude of pseudoneglect. Using a forced-choice tachistoscopic line bisection protocol, 184 subjects (92 male and 92 female) bisected horizontally oriented lines (22.3° wide X 0.39° height) presented to central vision in two conditions, in which bisection responses were executed via button presses using the first two fingers of either the left (LH) or right (RH) hand. Perceived line midpoint deviated significantly leftward of veridical (p < .05) in both conditions. There was no significant influence of subject sex (p > .05). A significant influence of animanual response was revealed (p < .05) where pseudoneglect magnitude was greater in the LH than the RH condition. The results are interpreted within the framework of the activationorientation theory of attentional asymmetry.

KW - Line bisection

KW - Pseudoneglect

KW - Spatial attention

KW - Unimanual

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035109904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035109904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/brcg.2000.1255

DO - 10.1006/brcg.2000.1255

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 52

EP - 63

JO - Brain and Cognition

JF - Brain and Cognition

SN - 0278-2626

IS - 1

ER -