The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory versus additive misinformation

False memory for typical and atypical items

Robert J. Nemeth, Robert F Belli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current study, we examined the influence of schema consistency on contradictory and additive misinformation. Sixty-four participants were shown a series of still photographs of common scenes (e.g., a kitchen), were later exposed to narratives containing misinformation, and were then tested on their memory of the photographic scenes. In addition, participants were asked to reflect on their phenomenological experience of remembering by giving remember/know responses. Participants reported greater false memory for schema-inconsistent items than schema-consistent items. The findings failed to replicate Roediger, Meade, and Bergman (2001). Explanations for the discrepant findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)563-573
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2006

Fingerprint

Eidetic Imagery
Communication
False Memory
Contradictory
Remembering
Remember-know
Kitchen
Sixties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory versus additive misinformation : False memory for typical and atypical items. / Nemeth, Robert J.; Belli, Robert F.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 5, 01.07.2006, p. 563-573.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbd7a3db60d74bc7b9d1c0b29537ea04,
title = "The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory versus additive misinformation: False memory for typical and atypical items",
abstract = "In the current study, we examined the influence of schema consistency on contradictory and additive misinformation. Sixty-four participants were shown a series of still photographs of common scenes (e.g., a kitchen), were later exposed to narratives containing misinformation, and were then tested on their memory of the photographic scenes. In addition, participants were asked to reflect on their phenomenological experience of remembering by giving remember/know responses. Participants reported greater false memory for schema-inconsistent items than schema-consistent items. The findings failed to replicate Roediger, Meade, and Bergman (2001). Explanations for the discrepant findings are discussed.",
author = "Nemeth, {Robert J.} and Belli, {Robert F}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acp.1207",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "563--573",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory versus additive misinformation

T2 - False memory for typical and atypical items

AU - Nemeth, Robert J.

AU - Belli, Robert F

PY - 2006/7/1

Y1 - 2006/7/1

N2 - In the current study, we examined the influence of schema consistency on contradictory and additive misinformation. Sixty-four participants were shown a series of still photographs of common scenes (e.g., a kitchen), were later exposed to narratives containing misinformation, and were then tested on their memory of the photographic scenes. In addition, participants were asked to reflect on their phenomenological experience of remembering by giving remember/know responses. Participants reported greater false memory for schema-inconsistent items than schema-consistent items. The findings failed to replicate Roediger, Meade, and Bergman (2001). Explanations for the discrepant findings are discussed.

AB - In the current study, we examined the influence of schema consistency on contradictory and additive misinformation. Sixty-four participants were shown a series of still photographs of common scenes (e.g., a kitchen), were later exposed to narratives containing misinformation, and were then tested on their memory of the photographic scenes. In addition, participants were asked to reflect on their phenomenological experience of remembering by giving remember/know responses. Participants reported greater false memory for schema-inconsistent items than schema-consistent items. The findings failed to replicate Roediger, Meade, and Bergman (2001). Explanations for the discrepant findings are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746142729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746142729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1207

DO - 10.1002/acp.1207

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 563

EP - 573

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 5

ER -