The Importance of Evaluating Health Disparities Research

Bruce A. Dye, Deborah G. Duran, David M. Murray, John W Creswell, Patrick Richard, Tilda Farhat, Nancy Breen, Michael M. Engelgau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Health disparity populations are socially disadvantaged, and the multiple levels of discrimination they often experience mean that their characteristics and attributes differ from those of the mainstream. Programs and policies targeted at reducing health disparities or improving minority health must consider these differences. Despite the importance of evaluating health disparities research to produce high-quality data that can guide decision-making, it is not yet a customary practice. Although health disparities evaluations incorporate the same scientific methods as all evaluations, they have unique components such as population characteristics, sociocultural context, and the lack of health disparity common indicators and metrics that must be considered in every phase of the research. This article describes evaluation strategies grouped into 3 components: formative (needs assessments and process), design and methodology (multilevel designs used in real-world settings), and summative (outcomes, impacts, and cost). Each section will describe the standards for each component, discuss the unique health disparity aspects, and provide strategies from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Metrics and Measures Visioning Workshop (April 2016) to advance the evaluation of health disparities research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S34-S40
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume109
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Minority Health
Needs Assessment
Vulnerable Populations
Population Characteristics
Decision Making
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Dye, B. A., Duran, D. G., Murray, D. M., Creswell, J. W., Richard, P., Farhat, T., ... Engelgau, M. M. (2019). The Importance of Evaluating Health Disparities Research. American journal of public health, 109(S1), S34-S40. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304808

The Importance of Evaluating Health Disparities Research. / Dye, Bruce A.; Duran, Deborah G.; Murray, David M.; Creswell, John W; Richard, Patrick; Farhat, Tilda; Breen, Nancy; Engelgau, Michael M.

In: American journal of public health, Vol. 109, No. S1, 01.01.2019, p. S34-S40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dye, BA, Duran, DG, Murray, DM, Creswell, JW, Richard, P, Farhat, T, Breen, N & Engelgau, MM 2019, 'The Importance of Evaluating Health Disparities Research', American journal of public health, vol. 109, no. S1, pp. S34-S40. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304808
Dye, Bruce A. ; Duran, Deborah G. ; Murray, David M. ; Creswell, John W ; Richard, Patrick ; Farhat, Tilda ; Breen, Nancy ; Engelgau, Michael M. / The Importance of Evaluating Health Disparities Research. In: American journal of public health. 2019 ; Vol. 109, No. S1. pp. S34-S40.
@article{dfb93cf6977d47da828f6364a3fd5cf7,
title = "The Importance of Evaluating Health Disparities Research",
abstract = "Health disparity populations are socially disadvantaged, and the multiple levels of discrimination they often experience mean that their characteristics and attributes differ from those of the mainstream. Programs and policies targeted at reducing health disparities or improving minority health must consider these differences. Despite the importance of evaluating health disparities research to produce high-quality data that can guide decision-making, it is not yet a customary practice. Although health disparities evaluations incorporate the same scientific methods as all evaluations, they have unique components such as population characteristics, sociocultural context, and the lack of health disparity common indicators and metrics that must be considered in every phase of the research. This article describes evaluation strategies grouped into 3 components: formative (needs assessments and process), design and methodology (multilevel designs used in real-world settings), and summative (outcomes, impacts, and cost). Each section will describe the standards for each component, discuss the unique health disparity aspects, and provide strategies from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Metrics and Measures Visioning Workshop (April 2016) to advance the evaluation of health disparities research.",
author = "Dye, {Bruce A.} and Duran, {Deborah G.} and Murray, {David M.} and Creswell, {John W} and Patrick Richard and Tilda Farhat and Nancy Breen and Engelgau, {Michael M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2018.304808",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "S34--S40",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Importance of Evaluating Health Disparities Research

AU - Dye, Bruce A.

AU - Duran, Deborah G.

AU - Murray, David M.

AU - Creswell, John W

AU - Richard, Patrick

AU - Farhat, Tilda

AU - Breen, Nancy

AU - Engelgau, Michael M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Health disparity populations are socially disadvantaged, and the multiple levels of discrimination they often experience mean that their characteristics and attributes differ from those of the mainstream. Programs and policies targeted at reducing health disparities or improving minority health must consider these differences. Despite the importance of evaluating health disparities research to produce high-quality data that can guide decision-making, it is not yet a customary practice. Although health disparities evaluations incorporate the same scientific methods as all evaluations, they have unique components such as population characteristics, sociocultural context, and the lack of health disparity common indicators and metrics that must be considered in every phase of the research. This article describes evaluation strategies grouped into 3 components: formative (needs assessments and process), design and methodology (multilevel designs used in real-world settings), and summative (outcomes, impacts, and cost). Each section will describe the standards for each component, discuss the unique health disparity aspects, and provide strategies from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Metrics and Measures Visioning Workshop (April 2016) to advance the evaluation of health disparities research.

AB - Health disparity populations are socially disadvantaged, and the multiple levels of discrimination they often experience mean that their characteristics and attributes differ from those of the mainstream. Programs and policies targeted at reducing health disparities or improving minority health must consider these differences. Despite the importance of evaluating health disparities research to produce high-quality data that can guide decision-making, it is not yet a customary practice. Although health disparities evaluations incorporate the same scientific methods as all evaluations, they have unique components such as population characteristics, sociocultural context, and the lack of health disparity common indicators and metrics that must be considered in every phase of the research. This article describes evaluation strategies grouped into 3 components: formative (needs assessments and process), design and methodology (multilevel designs used in real-world settings), and summative (outcomes, impacts, and cost). Each section will describe the standards for each component, discuss the unique health disparity aspects, and provide strategies from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Metrics and Measures Visioning Workshop (April 2016) to advance the evaluation of health disparities research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060916297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060916297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304808

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304808

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - S34-S40

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - S1

ER -