The impact of optical coherence tomography on surgical decision making in epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction

Diana V. Do, Minhee Cho, Dong Nguyen Quan, Syed Mahmood Shah, James T. Handa, Peter A. Campochiaro, Ingrid Zimmer-Galler, Jennifer U. Sung, Julia A. Haller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare retinal surgeons' recommendations for management of epiretinal membranes (ERM) and vitreomacular traction syndrome (VMT) based on clinical examination alone, with management based on examination supplemented by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: A prospective, masked clinical case series was conducted. Surgeons first assessed, on the basis of clinical examination only, whether ERM, VMT, or macular edema was present, questionably present, or absent and made a provisional management recommendation. The retina specialist then reviewed the OCT images, determined the presence or absence of ERM, VMT, or associated macular edema, and made a final management recommendation. Results: Eighty-four eyes of 73 patients were examined. ERM was identified in 66 (78.6%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 72 (85.7%) of 84 using OCT (P = .06). VMT was identified in five (6%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 18 (21.4%) of 84 using OCT (P < .005). Macular edema was identified in 57 (67.9%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 70 (83.3%) of 84 using OCT (P =.003). Surgical intervention was recommended in 33 cases: 19 (57.6%) based on clinical examination alone and 14 (42.4%) based on the combination of clinical examination and OCT findings. Conclusions: OCT is more sensitive than clinical examination in detecting ERM, VMT, and associated macular edema. OCT influenced the recommendation for surgical intervention in 42.4% of patients scheduled for surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-165
Number of pages5
JournalTransactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
Volume104
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

Epiretinal Membrane
Optical Coherence Tomography
Traction
Decision Making
Macular Edema
Retina

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Do, D. V., Cho, M., Quan, D. N., Shah, S. M., Handa, J. T., Campochiaro, P. A., ... Haller, J. A. (2006). The impact of optical coherence tomography on surgical decision making in epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, 104, 161-165.

The impact of optical coherence tomography on surgical decision making in epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction. / Do, Diana V.; Cho, Minhee; Quan, Dong Nguyen; Shah, Syed Mahmood; Handa, James T.; Campochiaro, Peter A.; Zimmer-Galler, Ingrid; Sung, Jennifer U.; Haller, Julia A.

In: Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, Vol. 104, 01.12.2006, p. 161-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Do, DV, Cho, M, Quan, DN, Shah, SM, Handa, JT, Campochiaro, PA, Zimmer-Galler, I, Sung, JU & Haller, JA 2006, 'The impact of optical coherence tomography on surgical decision making in epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction', Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 104, pp. 161-165.
Do, Diana V. ; Cho, Minhee ; Quan, Dong Nguyen ; Shah, Syed Mahmood ; Handa, James T. ; Campochiaro, Peter A. ; Zimmer-Galler, Ingrid ; Sung, Jennifer U. ; Haller, Julia A. / The impact of optical coherence tomography on surgical decision making in epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction. In: Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 2006 ; Vol. 104. pp. 161-165.
@article{fc14d084b9474792b4fc262979fe384a,
title = "The impact of optical coherence tomography on surgical decision making in epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare retinal surgeons' recommendations for management of epiretinal membranes (ERM) and vitreomacular traction syndrome (VMT) based on clinical examination alone, with management based on examination supplemented by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: A prospective, masked clinical case series was conducted. Surgeons first assessed, on the basis of clinical examination only, whether ERM, VMT, or macular edema was present, questionably present, or absent and made a provisional management recommendation. The retina specialist then reviewed the OCT images, determined the presence or absence of ERM, VMT, or associated macular edema, and made a final management recommendation. Results: Eighty-four eyes of 73 patients were examined. ERM was identified in 66 (78.6{\%}) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 72 (85.7{\%}) of 84 using OCT (P = .06). VMT was identified in five (6{\%}) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 18 (21.4{\%}) of 84 using OCT (P < .005). Macular edema was identified in 57 (67.9{\%}) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 70 (83.3{\%}) of 84 using OCT (P =.003). Surgical intervention was recommended in 33 cases: 19 (57.6{\%}) based on clinical examination alone and 14 (42.4{\%}) based on the combination of clinical examination and OCT findings. Conclusions: OCT is more sensitive than clinical examination in detecting ERM, VMT, and associated macular edema. OCT influenced the recommendation for surgical intervention in 42.4{\%} of patients scheduled for surgery.",
author = "Do, {Diana V.} and Minhee Cho and Quan, {Dong Nguyen} and Shah, {Syed Mahmood} and Handa, {James T.} and Campochiaro, {Peter A.} and Ingrid Zimmer-Galler and Sung, {Jennifer U.} and Haller, {Julia A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "161--165",
journal = "Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society",
issn = "0065-9533",
publisher = "American Ophthalmological Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of optical coherence tomography on surgical decision making in epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction

AU - Do, Diana V.

AU - Cho, Minhee

AU - Quan, Dong Nguyen

AU - Shah, Syed Mahmood

AU - Handa, James T.

AU - Campochiaro, Peter A.

AU - Zimmer-Galler, Ingrid

AU - Sung, Jennifer U.

AU - Haller, Julia A.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare retinal surgeons' recommendations for management of epiretinal membranes (ERM) and vitreomacular traction syndrome (VMT) based on clinical examination alone, with management based on examination supplemented by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: A prospective, masked clinical case series was conducted. Surgeons first assessed, on the basis of clinical examination only, whether ERM, VMT, or macular edema was present, questionably present, or absent and made a provisional management recommendation. The retina specialist then reviewed the OCT images, determined the presence or absence of ERM, VMT, or associated macular edema, and made a final management recommendation. Results: Eighty-four eyes of 73 patients were examined. ERM was identified in 66 (78.6%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 72 (85.7%) of 84 using OCT (P = .06). VMT was identified in five (6%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 18 (21.4%) of 84 using OCT (P < .005). Macular edema was identified in 57 (67.9%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 70 (83.3%) of 84 using OCT (P =.003). Surgical intervention was recommended in 33 cases: 19 (57.6%) based on clinical examination alone and 14 (42.4%) based on the combination of clinical examination and OCT findings. Conclusions: OCT is more sensitive than clinical examination in detecting ERM, VMT, and associated macular edema. OCT influenced the recommendation for surgical intervention in 42.4% of patients scheduled for surgery.

AB - Purpose: To compare retinal surgeons' recommendations for management of epiretinal membranes (ERM) and vitreomacular traction syndrome (VMT) based on clinical examination alone, with management based on examination supplemented by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: A prospective, masked clinical case series was conducted. Surgeons first assessed, on the basis of clinical examination only, whether ERM, VMT, or macular edema was present, questionably present, or absent and made a provisional management recommendation. The retina specialist then reviewed the OCT images, determined the presence or absence of ERM, VMT, or associated macular edema, and made a final management recommendation. Results: Eighty-four eyes of 73 patients were examined. ERM was identified in 66 (78.6%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 72 (85.7%) of 84 using OCT (P = .06). VMT was identified in five (6%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 18 (21.4%) of 84 using OCT (P < .005). Macular edema was identified in 57 (67.9%) of 84 using clinical examination compared to 70 (83.3%) of 84 using OCT (P =.003). Surgical intervention was recommended in 33 cases: 19 (57.6%) based on clinical examination alone and 14 (42.4%) based on the combination of clinical examination and OCT findings. Conclusions: OCT is more sensitive than clinical examination in detecting ERM, VMT, and associated macular edema. OCT influenced the recommendation for surgical intervention in 42.4% of patients scheduled for surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947622074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947622074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17471336

AN - SCOPUS:33947622074

VL - 104

SP - 161

EP - 165

JO - Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society

JF - Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society

SN - 0065-9533

ER -