The impact of health literacy on rural adults' satisfaction with a multi-component intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake

A. N. Bailey, K. J. Porter, Jennie L Hill, Y. Chen, Paul A Estabrooks, J. M. Zoellner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

SIPsmartER is a 6-month behavioral intervention designed using a health literacy universal precautions approach that has been found effective at reducing sugary beverage intake in rural, low socioeconomic adults. The purpose of this mixed-methods study is to determine if health literacy status influenced participants' satisfaction and perceptions of each intervention component: small group classes, interactive-voice response (IVR) calls, personal action plans and self-monitoring logs. Of the 155 participants enrolled in SIPsmartER, 105 (68%) completed an interview-administered summative evaluation including 68 high and 37 low health literate participants. The quantitative findings show participant satisfaction with each intervention component was high (i.e. classes = 9.6, IVR calls = 8.1, action plans = 8.9-9.1, logs = 8.7 on a 10-point scale) and similar across both health literacy groups. The majority of qualitative responses were positive (81.8%) and code counts were comparable between literacy groups with a few exceptions. As compared with high health literacy respondents, low health literacy respondents more frequently mentioned liking the content and length of IVR calls, liking the motivational aspects of the personal action plans, and identified numeracy issues with the self-monitoring logs. Overall, applying a health literacy universal precautions approach is an effective and acceptable strategy for both high and low health literacy groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)492-508
Number of pages17
JournalHealth Education Research
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Beverages
literacy
health
Universal Precautions
action plan
monitoring
Group
Health Status
small group
Interviews
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The impact of health literacy on rural adults' satisfaction with a multi-component intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake. / Bailey, A. N.; Porter, K. J.; Hill, Jennie L; Chen, Y.; Estabrooks, Paul A; Zoellner, J. M.

In: Health Education Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.08.2016, p. 492-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{caef7746701e47eb8fa0a9abab81b657,
title = "The impact of health literacy on rural adults' satisfaction with a multi-component intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake",
abstract = "SIPsmartER is a 6-month behavioral intervention designed using a health literacy universal precautions approach that has been found effective at reducing sugary beverage intake in rural, low socioeconomic adults. The purpose of this mixed-methods study is to determine if health literacy status influenced participants' satisfaction and perceptions of each intervention component: small group classes, interactive-voice response (IVR) calls, personal action plans and self-monitoring logs. Of the 155 participants enrolled in SIPsmartER, 105 (68{\%}) completed an interview-administered summative evaluation including 68 high and 37 low health literate participants. The quantitative findings show participant satisfaction with each intervention component was high (i.e. classes = 9.6, IVR calls = 8.1, action plans = 8.9-9.1, logs = 8.7 on a 10-point scale) and similar across both health literacy groups. The majority of qualitative responses were positive (81.8{\%}) and code counts were comparable between literacy groups with a few exceptions. As compared with high health literacy respondents, low health literacy respondents more frequently mentioned liking the content and length of IVR calls, liking the motivational aspects of the personal action plans, and identified numeracy issues with the self-monitoring logs. Overall, applying a health literacy universal precautions approach is an effective and acceptable strategy for both high and low health literacy groups.",
author = "Bailey, {A. N.} and Porter, {K. J.} and Hill, {Jennie L} and Y. Chen and Estabrooks, {Paul A} and Zoellner, {J. M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/her/cyw024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "492--508",
journal = "Health Education Research",
issn = "0268-1153",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of health literacy on rural adults' satisfaction with a multi-component intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake

AU - Bailey, A. N.

AU - Porter, K. J.

AU - Hill, Jennie L

AU - Chen, Y.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A

AU - Zoellner, J. M.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - SIPsmartER is a 6-month behavioral intervention designed using a health literacy universal precautions approach that has been found effective at reducing sugary beverage intake in rural, low socioeconomic adults. The purpose of this mixed-methods study is to determine if health literacy status influenced participants' satisfaction and perceptions of each intervention component: small group classes, interactive-voice response (IVR) calls, personal action plans and self-monitoring logs. Of the 155 participants enrolled in SIPsmartER, 105 (68%) completed an interview-administered summative evaluation including 68 high and 37 low health literate participants. The quantitative findings show participant satisfaction with each intervention component was high (i.e. classes = 9.6, IVR calls = 8.1, action plans = 8.9-9.1, logs = 8.7 on a 10-point scale) and similar across both health literacy groups. The majority of qualitative responses were positive (81.8%) and code counts were comparable between literacy groups with a few exceptions. As compared with high health literacy respondents, low health literacy respondents more frequently mentioned liking the content and length of IVR calls, liking the motivational aspects of the personal action plans, and identified numeracy issues with the self-monitoring logs. Overall, applying a health literacy universal precautions approach is an effective and acceptable strategy for both high and low health literacy groups.

AB - SIPsmartER is a 6-month behavioral intervention designed using a health literacy universal precautions approach that has been found effective at reducing sugary beverage intake in rural, low socioeconomic adults. The purpose of this mixed-methods study is to determine if health literacy status influenced participants' satisfaction and perceptions of each intervention component: small group classes, interactive-voice response (IVR) calls, personal action plans and self-monitoring logs. Of the 155 participants enrolled in SIPsmartER, 105 (68%) completed an interview-administered summative evaluation including 68 high and 37 low health literate participants. The quantitative findings show participant satisfaction with each intervention component was high (i.e. classes = 9.6, IVR calls = 8.1, action plans = 8.9-9.1, logs = 8.7 on a 10-point scale) and similar across both health literacy groups. The majority of qualitative responses were positive (81.8%) and code counts were comparable between literacy groups with a few exceptions. As compared with high health literacy respondents, low health literacy respondents more frequently mentioned liking the content and length of IVR calls, liking the motivational aspects of the personal action plans, and identified numeracy issues with the self-monitoring logs. Overall, applying a health literacy universal precautions approach is an effective and acceptable strategy for both high and low health literacy groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982167154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982167154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/her/cyw024

DO - 10.1093/her/cyw024

M3 - Article

C2 - 27173641

AN - SCOPUS:84982167154

VL - 31

SP - 492

EP - 508

JO - Health Education Research

JF - Health Education Research

SN - 0268-1153

IS - 4

ER -