The Impact of Ethnicity, Immigration Status, and Socioeconomic Status on Juror Decision Making

Russ K.E. Espinoza, Cynthia Willis-Esqueda, Suzette Toscano, Jennifer Coons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine how ethnicity, immigration status, and socioeconomic status (SES) may contribute to juror bias. A total of 320 Euro-American venire persons were assigned to 1 of 8 criminal court trial transcript conditions that varied defendant ethnicity (Mexican or Canadian), immigrant status (undocumented or documented), and SES (low or high). Dependent measures were verdict, sentencing, culpability, and trait attributions. Results indicated that the low-SES undocumented Mexican defendant was found guilty more often, given a more severe sentence, thought to be more culpable, and rated lower on a number of trait measures compared with all other conditions. Subtle bias theories, such as aversive racism, appear to best explain the biases in juror decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-216
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2015

Fingerprint

social status
immigration
ethnicity
decision making
trend
attribution
racism
immigrant
human being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Law

Cite this

The Impact of Ethnicity, Immigration Status, and Socioeconomic Status on Juror Decision Making. / Espinoza, Russ K.E.; Willis-Esqueda, Cynthia; Toscano, Suzette; Coons, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, Vol. 13, No. 3, 03.07.2015, p. 197-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2346e96d4fb14f2a8a3a811369a30efd,
title = "The Impact of Ethnicity, Immigration Status, and Socioeconomic Status on Juror Decision Making",
abstract = "The purpose of this research was to examine how ethnicity, immigration status, and socioeconomic status (SES) may contribute to juror bias. A total of 320 Euro-American venire persons were assigned to 1 of 8 criminal court trial transcript conditions that varied defendant ethnicity (Mexican or Canadian), immigrant status (undocumented or documented), and SES (low or high). Dependent measures were verdict, sentencing, culpability, and trait attributions. Results indicated that the low-SES undocumented Mexican defendant was found guilty more often, given a more severe sentence, thought to be more culpable, and rated lower on a number of trait measures compared with all other conditions. Subtle bias theories, such as aversive racism, appear to best explain the biases in juror decisions.",
author = "Espinoza, {Russ K.E.} and Cynthia Willis-Esqueda and Suzette Toscano and Jennifer Coons",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/15377938.2014.984044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "197--216",
journal = "Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice",
issn = "1537-7938",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impact of Ethnicity, Immigration Status, and Socioeconomic Status on Juror Decision Making

AU - Espinoza, Russ K.E.

AU - Willis-Esqueda, Cynthia

AU - Toscano, Suzette

AU - Coons, Jennifer

PY - 2015/7/3

Y1 - 2015/7/3

N2 - The purpose of this research was to examine how ethnicity, immigration status, and socioeconomic status (SES) may contribute to juror bias. A total of 320 Euro-American venire persons were assigned to 1 of 8 criminal court trial transcript conditions that varied defendant ethnicity (Mexican or Canadian), immigrant status (undocumented or documented), and SES (low or high). Dependent measures were verdict, sentencing, culpability, and trait attributions. Results indicated that the low-SES undocumented Mexican defendant was found guilty more often, given a more severe sentence, thought to be more culpable, and rated lower on a number of trait measures compared with all other conditions. Subtle bias theories, such as aversive racism, appear to best explain the biases in juror decisions.

AB - The purpose of this research was to examine how ethnicity, immigration status, and socioeconomic status (SES) may contribute to juror bias. A total of 320 Euro-American venire persons were assigned to 1 of 8 criminal court trial transcript conditions that varied defendant ethnicity (Mexican or Canadian), immigrant status (undocumented or documented), and SES (low or high). Dependent measures were verdict, sentencing, culpability, and trait attributions. Results indicated that the low-SES undocumented Mexican defendant was found guilty more often, given a more severe sentence, thought to be more culpable, and rated lower on a number of trait measures compared with all other conditions. Subtle bias theories, such as aversive racism, appear to best explain the biases in juror decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929030831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929030831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15377938.2014.984044

DO - 10.1080/15377938.2014.984044

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 197

EP - 216

JO - Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice

SN - 1537-7938

IS - 3

ER -