The impact of boot camps and traditional institutions on juvenile residents

Perceptions, adjustment, and change

D. L. MacKenzie, D. B. Wilson, Gaylene Armstrong, A. R. Gover

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experiences of 2,668 juveniles in 26 boot camps were compared to 1,848 juveniles in 22 traditional facilities. There were no reported differences between juveniles' anxiety and depression in the two types of facilities during their first month of confinement. Overall, juveniles in boot camps perceived their environment to be more positive (i.e., therapeutic), less hostile (i.e., dangerous), and as providing less freedom (conversely more structure) than juveniles in traditional facilities. Relative to others in the same facility, youth who viewed their facility negatively experienced more stress (i.e., anxiety, depression). Scales measuring changes over time found that youth in boot camps became less antisocial and less depressed than youth in traditional facilities. However, analyses suggest that it was not the facility type but positive perceptions of the environment that determined these changes. Furthermore, youth with histories of abuse reported higher levels of stress and exhibited less improvement overall, faring better in traditional facilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-313
Number of pages35
JournalJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Anxiety
Depression
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The impact of boot camps and traditional institutions on juvenile residents : Perceptions, adjustment, and change. / MacKenzie, D. L.; Wilson, D. B.; Armstrong, Gaylene; Gover, A. R.

In: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 279-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8bc110ec643f421d9b00465632a2c3f6,
title = "The impact of boot camps and traditional institutions on juvenile residents: Perceptions, adjustment, and change",
abstract = "Experiences of 2,668 juveniles in 26 boot camps were compared to 1,848 juveniles in 22 traditional facilities. There were no reported differences between juveniles' anxiety and depression in the two types of facilities during their first month of confinement. Overall, juveniles in boot camps perceived their environment to be more positive (i.e., therapeutic), less hostile (i.e., dangerous), and as providing less freedom (conversely more structure) than juveniles in traditional facilities. Relative to others in the same facility, youth who viewed their facility negatively experienced more stress (i.e., anxiety, depression). Scales measuring changes over time found that youth in boot camps became less antisocial and less depressed than youth in traditional facilities. However, analyses suggest that it was not the facility type but positive perceptions of the environment that determined these changes. Furthermore, youth with histories of abuse reported higher levels of stress and exhibited less improvement overall, faring better in traditional facilities.",
author = "MacKenzie, {D. L.} and Wilson, {D. B.} and Gaylene Armstrong and Gover, {A. R.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022427801038003004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "279--313",
journal = "Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0022-4278",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of boot camps and traditional institutions on juvenile residents

T2 - Perceptions, adjustment, and change

AU - MacKenzie, D. L.

AU - Wilson, D. B.

AU - Armstrong, Gaylene

AU - Gover, A. R.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Experiences of 2,668 juveniles in 26 boot camps were compared to 1,848 juveniles in 22 traditional facilities. There were no reported differences between juveniles' anxiety and depression in the two types of facilities during their first month of confinement. Overall, juveniles in boot camps perceived their environment to be more positive (i.e., therapeutic), less hostile (i.e., dangerous), and as providing less freedom (conversely more structure) than juveniles in traditional facilities. Relative to others in the same facility, youth who viewed their facility negatively experienced more stress (i.e., anxiety, depression). Scales measuring changes over time found that youth in boot camps became less antisocial and less depressed than youth in traditional facilities. However, analyses suggest that it was not the facility type but positive perceptions of the environment that determined these changes. Furthermore, youth with histories of abuse reported higher levels of stress and exhibited less improvement overall, faring better in traditional facilities.

AB - Experiences of 2,668 juveniles in 26 boot camps were compared to 1,848 juveniles in 22 traditional facilities. There were no reported differences between juveniles' anxiety and depression in the two types of facilities during their first month of confinement. Overall, juveniles in boot camps perceived their environment to be more positive (i.e., therapeutic), less hostile (i.e., dangerous), and as providing less freedom (conversely more structure) than juveniles in traditional facilities. Relative to others in the same facility, youth who viewed their facility negatively experienced more stress (i.e., anxiety, depression). Scales measuring changes over time found that youth in boot camps became less antisocial and less depressed than youth in traditional facilities. However, analyses suggest that it was not the facility type but positive perceptions of the environment that determined these changes. Furthermore, youth with histories of abuse reported higher levels of stress and exhibited less improvement overall, faring better in traditional facilities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034890623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034890623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022427801038003004

DO - 10.1177/0022427801038003004

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 279

EP - 313

JO - Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

JF - Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0022-4278

IS - 3

ER -