The identification of individuals with disabilities in national databases

Creating a failure to communicate

Kevin S. McGrew, Bob Algozzine, James E. Ysseldyke, Martha L. Thurlow, Amy N Spiegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze similarities and differences in how students with disabilities are identified in national databases. National data collection programs in the U.S. Departments of Education, Commerce, Labor, Justice, and Health and Human Services, as well as databases from the National Science Foundation, the American Council of Education, and the College Board, were examined. Nineteen national data collection programs were selected as being potentially useful in the extraction of policy-relevant information on the educational status and performance of students with disabilities. Among these 19 programs there was significant variability in the disability categories used. These programs were targeted for two reasons: (a) their potential usefulness in providing indicators of domains in key models of educational outcomes for children and youth with disabilities, and (b) their prominence in current efforts to monitor progress toward the attainment of national education goals. Discussed are issues related to improving disability identification in large-scale data collection programs and the effects of these issues on reporting policy-relevant information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)472-487
Number of pages16
JournalThe Journal of Special Education
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

disability
Databases
Education
information policy
Educational Models
Students
Educational Status
Disabled Children
Social Justice
Health Services
education
commerce
student
justice
labor
science
health
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

The identification of individuals with disabilities in national databases : Creating a failure to communicate. / McGrew, Kevin S.; Algozzine, Bob; Ysseldyke, James E.; Thurlow, Martha L.; Spiegel, Amy N.

In: The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.01.1995, p. 472-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGrew, Kevin S. ; Algozzine, Bob ; Ysseldyke, James E. ; Thurlow, Martha L. ; Spiegel, Amy N. / The identification of individuals with disabilities in national databases : Creating a failure to communicate. In: The Journal of Special Education. 1995 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 472-487.
@article{aa487919e82541f59e0fa07f6207e6ff,
title = "The identification of individuals with disabilities in national databases: Creating a failure to communicate",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to analyze similarities and differences in how students with disabilities are identified in national databases. National data collection programs in the U.S. Departments of Education, Commerce, Labor, Justice, and Health and Human Services, as well as databases from the National Science Foundation, the American Council of Education, and the College Board, were examined. Nineteen national data collection programs were selected as being potentially useful in the extraction of policy-relevant information on the educational status and performance of students with disabilities. Among these 19 programs there was significant variability in the disability categories used. These programs were targeted for two reasons: (a) their potential usefulness in providing indicators of domains in key models of educational outcomes for children and youth with disabilities, and (b) their prominence in current efforts to monitor progress toward the attainment of national education goals. Discussed are issues related to improving disability identification in large-scale data collection programs and the effects of these issues on reporting policy-relevant information.",
author = "McGrew, {Kevin S.} and Bob Algozzine and Ysseldyke, {James E.} and Thurlow, {Martha L.} and Spiegel, {Amy N}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002246699502800406",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "472--487",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The identification of individuals with disabilities in national databases

T2 - Creating a failure to communicate

AU - McGrew, Kevin S.

AU - Algozzine, Bob

AU - Ysseldyke, James E.

AU - Thurlow, Martha L.

AU - Spiegel, Amy N

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to analyze similarities and differences in how students with disabilities are identified in national databases. National data collection programs in the U.S. Departments of Education, Commerce, Labor, Justice, and Health and Human Services, as well as databases from the National Science Foundation, the American Council of Education, and the College Board, were examined. Nineteen national data collection programs were selected as being potentially useful in the extraction of policy-relevant information on the educational status and performance of students with disabilities. Among these 19 programs there was significant variability in the disability categories used. These programs were targeted for two reasons: (a) their potential usefulness in providing indicators of domains in key models of educational outcomes for children and youth with disabilities, and (b) their prominence in current efforts to monitor progress toward the attainment of national education goals. Discussed are issues related to improving disability identification in large-scale data collection programs and the effects of these issues on reporting policy-relevant information.

AB - The purpose of this study was to analyze similarities and differences in how students with disabilities are identified in national databases. National data collection programs in the U.S. Departments of Education, Commerce, Labor, Justice, and Health and Human Services, as well as databases from the National Science Foundation, the American Council of Education, and the College Board, were examined. Nineteen national data collection programs were selected as being potentially useful in the extraction of policy-relevant information on the educational status and performance of students with disabilities. Among these 19 programs there was significant variability in the disability categories used. These programs were targeted for two reasons: (a) their potential usefulness in providing indicators of domains in key models of educational outcomes for children and youth with disabilities, and (b) their prominence in current efforts to monitor progress toward the attainment of national education goals. Discussed are issues related to improving disability identification in large-scale data collection programs and the effects of these issues on reporting policy-relevant information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21844495505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21844495505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002246699502800406

DO - 10.1177/002246699502800406

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 472

EP - 487

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 4

ER -