The Genetic Basis of Creativity and Ideational Fluency

Mark A. Runco, Ernest P. Noble, Roni Reiter-Palmon, Selcuk Acar, Terry Ritchie, Justin M. Yurkovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reuter, Roth, Holve, & Hennig (2006) described what they called the first candidate gene for creativity. This study replicated and extended their work for a more careful analysis of five candidate genes: Dopamine Transporter (DAT), Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT), Dopamine Receptor D4 (DRD4), D2 Dopamine Receptor (DRD2), and Tryptophane Hydroxylase (TPH1). Participants were 147 college students who received a battery of tests of creative potential. Multivariate analyses of variance indicated that ideational fluency scores were significantly associated with several genes (DAT, COMT, DRD4, and TPH1). This was apparent in both verbal and figural fluency ideation scores, before and after controlling general intelligence. Yet fluency, alone, is not an adequate measure of creativity, and the index that is by far the most important part of creativity (i.e., originality) had a negligible relationship with the genes under investigation. Hence, in contrast to earlier research, the conclusion offered here is that there is a clear genetic basis for ideational fluency, but that fluency, alone, is not sufficient to predict or guarantee creative performance. Hence, at present, the genetic basis of creativity remains uncertain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-380
Number of pages5
JournalCreativity Research Journal
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Creativity
Catechol O-Methyltransferase
Dopamine D2 Receptors
Dopamine D4 Receptors
Genes
Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
Genetic Association Studies
Mixed Function Oxygenases
Intelligence
Analysis of Variance
Multivariate Analysis
Students
Fluency
Ideational
Research
Gene
Dopamine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., & Yurkovich, J. M. (2011). The Genetic Basis of Creativity and Ideational Fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 376-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.621859

The Genetic Basis of Creativity and Ideational Fluency. / Runco, Mark A.; Noble, Ernest P.; Reiter-Palmon, Roni; Acar, Selcuk; Ritchie, Terry; Yurkovich, Justin M.

In: Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.10.2011, p. 376-380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Runco, MA, Noble, EP, Reiter-Palmon, R, Acar, S, Ritchie, T & Yurkovich, JM 2011, 'The Genetic Basis of Creativity and Ideational Fluency', Creativity Research Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 376-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.621859
Runco, Mark A. ; Noble, Ernest P. ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Acar, Selcuk ; Ritchie, Terry ; Yurkovich, Justin M. / The Genetic Basis of Creativity and Ideational Fluency. In: Creativity Research Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 376-380.
@article{7fb7309440ae4445b04a0c4c161dd505,
title = "The Genetic Basis of Creativity and Ideational Fluency",
abstract = "Reuter, Roth, Holve, & Hennig (2006) described what they called the first candidate gene for creativity. This study replicated and extended their work for a more careful analysis of five candidate genes: Dopamine Transporter (DAT), Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT), Dopamine Receptor D4 (DRD4), D2 Dopamine Receptor (DRD2), and Tryptophane Hydroxylase (TPH1). Participants were 147 college students who received a battery of tests of creative potential. Multivariate analyses of variance indicated that ideational fluency scores were significantly associated with several genes (DAT, COMT, DRD4, and TPH1). This was apparent in both verbal and figural fluency ideation scores, before and after controlling general intelligence. Yet fluency, alone, is not an adequate measure of creativity, and the index that is by far the most important part of creativity (i.e., originality) had a negligible relationship with the genes under investigation. Hence, in contrast to earlier research, the conclusion offered here is that there is a clear genetic basis for ideational fluency, but that fluency, alone, is not sufficient to predict or guarantee creative performance. Hence, at present, the genetic basis of creativity remains uncertain.",
author = "Runco, {Mark A.} and Noble, {Ernest P.} and Roni Reiter-Palmon and Selcuk Acar and Terry Ritchie and Yurkovich, {Justin M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10400419.2011.621859",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "376--380",
journal = "Creativity Research Journal",
issn = "1040-0419",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Genetic Basis of Creativity and Ideational Fluency

AU - Runco, Mark A.

AU - Noble, Ernest P.

AU - Reiter-Palmon, Roni

AU - Acar, Selcuk

AU - Ritchie, Terry

AU - Yurkovich, Justin M.

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Reuter, Roth, Holve, & Hennig (2006) described what they called the first candidate gene for creativity. This study replicated and extended their work for a more careful analysis of five candidate genes: Dopamine Transporter (DAT), Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT), Dopamine Receptor D4 (DRD4), D2 Dopamine Receptor (DRD2), and Tryptophane Hydroxylase (TPH1). Participants were 147 college students who received a battery of tests of creative potential. Multivariate analyses of variance indicated that ideational fluency scores were significantly associated with several genes (DAT, COMT, DRD4, and TPH1). This was apparent in both verbal and figural fluency ideation scores, before and after controlling general intelligence. Yet fluency, alone, is not an adequate measure of creativity, and the index that is by far the most important part of creativity (i.e., originality) had a negligible relationship with the genes under investigation. Hence, in contrast to earlier research, the conclusion offered here is that there is a clear genetic basis for ideational fluency, but that fluency, alone, is not sufficient to predict or guarantee creative performance. Hence, at present, the genetic basis of creativity remains uncertain.

AB - Reuter, Roth, Holve, & Hennig (2006) described what they called the first candidate gene for creativity. This study replicated and extended their work for a more careful analysis of five candidate genes: Dopamine Transporter (DAT), Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT), Dopamine Receptor D4 (DRD4), D2 Dopamine Receptor (DRD2), and Tryptophane Hydroxylase (TPH1). Participants were 147 college students who received a battery of tests of creative potential. Multivariate analyses of variance indicated that ideational fluency scores were significantly associated with several genes (DAT, COMT, DRD4, and TPH1). This was apparent in both verbal and figural fluency ideation scores, before and after controlling general intelligence. Yet fluency, alone, is not an adequate measure of creativity, and the index that is by far the most important part of creativity (i.e., originality) had a negligible relationship with the genes under investigation. Hence, in contrast to earlier research, the conclusion offered here is that there is a clear genetic basis for ideational fluency, but that fluency, alone, is not sufficient to predict or guarantee creative performance. Hence, at present, the genetic basis of creativity remains uncertain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857296810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857296810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10400419.2011.621859

DO - 10.1080/10400419.2011.621859

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84857296810

VL - 23

SP - 376

EP - 380

JO - Creativity Research Journal

JF - Creativity Research Journal

SN - 1040-0419

IS - 4

ER -