The Future of Health Behavior Change Research: What Is Needed to Improve Translation of Research into Health Promotion Practice?

Russell E. Glasgow, Lisa M. Klesges, David A. Dzewaltowski, Sheana S. Bull, Paul Estabrooks

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

364 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is well documented that the results of most behavioral and health promotion studies have not been translated into practice. Purpose: In this article, reasons for this gap, focusing on study design characteristics as a central contributing barrier, are discussed. Methods: Four reviews of recent controlled studies in work sites, health care, school, and community settings are briefly discussed and summarized. Their implications for future research and for closing the gap between research and practice are then discussed. Results: These reviews come to consistent conclusions regarding key internal and external validity, factors that have and have not been reported. It is very clear that moderating variables and generalization issues have not been included or reported in the majority of investigations, and that as a consequence little is known about the representatives or the robustness of results from current studies. Conclusions: To significantly improve the current state of affairs, substantial changes will be required on the part of researchers, funding agencies, and review and editorial boards. In conclusion, recommendations for each of these entities are provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-12
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Health Behavior
Health Promotion
Workplace
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The Future of Health Behavior Change Research : What Is Needed to Improve Translation of Research into Health Promotion Practice? / Glasgow, Russell E.; Klesges, Lisa M.; Dzewaltowski, David A.; Bull, Sheana S.; Estabrooks, Paul.

In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 3-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{74905a19051a4d259ef272f2eab1004d,
title = "The Future of Health Behavior Change Research: What Is Needed to Improve Translation of Research into Health Promotion Practice?",
abstract = "Background: It is well documented that the results of most behavioral and health promotion studies have not been translated into practice. Purpose: In this article, reasons for this gap, focusing on study design characteristics as a central contributing barrier, are discussed. Methods: Four reviews of recent controlled studies in work sites, health care, school, and community settings are briefly discussed and summarized. Their implications for future research and for closing the gap between research and practice are then discussed. Results: These reviews come to consistent conclusions regarding key internal and external validity, factors that have and have not been reported. It is very clear that moderating variables and generalization issues have not been included or reported in the majority of investigations, and that as a consequence little is known about the representatives or the robustness of results from current studies. Conclusions: To significantly improve the current state of affairs, substantial changes will be required on the part of researchers, funding agencies, and review and editorial boards. In conclusion, recommendations for each of these entities are provided.",
author = "Glasgow, {Russell E.} and Klesges, {Lisa M.} and Dzewaltowski, {David A.} and Bull, {Sheana S.} and Paul Estabrooks",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "3--12",
journal = "Annals of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0883-6612",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Future of Health Behavior Change Research

T2 - What Is Needed to Improve Translation of Research into Health Promotion Practice?

AU - Glasgow, Russell E.

AU - Klesges, Lisa M.

AU - Dzewaltowski, David A.

AU - Bull, Sheana S.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Background: It is well documented that the results of most behavioral and health promotion studies have not been translated into practice. Purpose: In this article, reasons for this gap, focusing on study design characteristics as a central contributing barrier, are discussed. Methods: Four reviews of recent controlled studies in work sites, health care, school, and community settings are briefly discussed and summarized. Their implications for future research and for closing the gap between research and practice are then discussed. Results: These reviews come to consistent conclusions regarding key internal and external validity, factors that have and have not been reported. It is very clear that moderating variables and generalization issues have not been included or reported in the majority of investigations, and that as a consequence little is known about the representatives or the robustness of results from current studies. Conclusions: To significantly improve the current state of affairs, substantial changes will be required on the part of researchers, funding agencies, and review and editorial boards. In conclusion, recommendations for each of these entities are provided.

AB - Background: It is well documented that the results of most behavioral and health promotion studies have not been translated into practice. Purpose: In this article, reasons for this gap, focusing on study design characteristics as a central contributing barrier, are discussed. Methods: Four reviews of recent controlled studies in work sites, health care, school, and community settings are briefly discussed and summarized. Their implications for future research and for closing the gap between research and practice are then discussed. Results: These reviews come to consistent conclusions regarding key internal and external validity, factors that have and have not been reported. It is very clear that moderating variables and generalization issues have not been included or reported in the majority of investigations, and that as a consequence little is known about the representatives or the robustness of results from current studies. Conclusions: To significantly improve the current state of affairs, substantial changes will be required on the part of researchers, funding agencies, and review and editorial boards. In conclusion, recommendations for each of these entities are provided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345742603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345742603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2

DO - 10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2

M3 - Review article

C2 - 14979858

AN - SCOPUS:0345742603

VL - 27

SP - 3

EP - 12

JO - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

JF - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0883-6612

IS - 1

ER -