The femininity-money incongruity hypothesis: Money and femininity reminders undermine women’s cognitive performance

Jill Allen, Sarah J. Gervais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Women are often stereotyped as poorly equipped to deal with money matters, compared to men, yet very little research has examined the underpinnings and consequences of such gender stereotypes. Drawing on descriptive and prescriptive elements of women’s social roles, we empirically examined the gendered nature of money stereotypes. Specifically in the current work, we introduced and investigated the femininity-money incongruity hypothesis, which suggests that when the concepts of femininity and money are both cognitively activated, money will become a liability for women, causing decrements in cognitive functioning. We first probed the role of gender identity and benevolent sexism beliefs in women’s endorsement of money- gender stereotypes. In two subsequent experiments, we tested the hypothesis that simultaneously activating money and femininity would lead to decrements in cognitive functioning. Converging results across studies suggest that money is incompatible with the stereotypic female gender identity, and this incongruity has detrimental cognitive costs for women as they navigate gender roles. Implications of societal challenges imposed on women by gender stereotypes regarding money matters at work and in relationship contexts and proposed interventions are discussed. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684317718505.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-419
Number of pages13
JournalPsychology of Women Quarterly
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Femininity
femininity
money
performance
stereotype
gender
Sexism
Cognitive Performance
Incongruity
sexism
Social Role
gender role
liability
website
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Gender roles
  • Money
  • Sexism
  • Stroop

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The femininity-money incongruity hypothesis : Money and femininity reminders undermine women’s cognitive performance. / Allen, Jill; Gervais, Sarah J.

In: Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.01.2017, p. 407-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12357fddc0c6462b8248c3d43eb9245f,
title = "The femininity-money incongruity hypothesis: Money and femininity reminders undermine women’s cognitive performance",
abstract = "Women are often stereotyped as poorly equipped to deal with money matters, compared to men, yet very little research has examined the underpinnings and consequences of such gender stereotypes. Drawing on descriptive and prescriptive elements of women’s social roles, we empirically examined the gendered nature of money stereotypes. Specifically in the current work, we introduced and investigated the femininity-money incongruity hypothesis, which suggests that when the concepts of femininity and money are both cognitively activated, money will become a liability for women, causing decrements in cognitive functioning. We first probed the role of gender identity and benevolent sexism beliefs in women’s endorsement of money- gender stereotypes. In two subsequent experiments, we tested the hypothesis that simultaneously activating money and femininity would lead to decrements in cognitive functioning. Converging results across studies suggest that money is incompatible with the stereotypic female gender identity, and this incongruity has detrimental cognitive costs for women as they navigate gender roles. Implications of societal challenges imposed on women by gender stereotypes regarding money matters at work and in relationship contexts and proposed interventions are discussed. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684317718505.",
keywords = "Cognition, Gender roles, Money, Sexism, Stroop",
author = "Jill Allen and Gervais, {Sarah J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0361684317718505",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "407--419",
journal = "Psychology of Women Quarterly",
issn = "0361-6843",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The femininity-money incongruity hypothesis

T2 - Money and femininity reminders undermine women’s cognitive performance

AU - Allen, Jill

AU - Gervais, Sarah J.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Women are often stereotyped as poorly equipped to deal with money matters, compared to men, yet very little research has examined the underpinnings and consequences of such gender stereotypes. Drawing on descriptive and prescriptive elements of women’s social roles, we empirically examined the gendered nature of money stereotypes. Specifically in the current work, we introduced and investigated the femininity-money incongruity hypothesis, which suggests that when the concepts of femininity and money are both cognitively activated, money will become a liability for women, causing decrements in cognitive functioning. We first probed the role of gender identity and benevolent sexism beliefs in women’s endorsement of money- gender stereotypes. In two subsequent experiments, we tested the hypothesis that simultaneously activating money and femininity would lead to decrements in cognitive functioning. Converging results across studies suggest that money is incompatible with the stereotypic female gender identity, and this incongruity has detrimental cognitive costs for women as they navigate gender roles. Implications of societal challenges imposed on women by gender stereotypes regarding money matters at work and in relationship contexts and proposed interventions are discussed. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684317718505.

AB - Women are often stereotyped as poorly equipped to deal with money matters, compared to men, yet very little research has examined the underpinnings and consequences of such gender stereotypes. Drawing on descriptive and prescriptive elements of women’s social roles, we empirically examined the gendered nature of money stereotypes. Specifically in the current work, we introduced and investigated the femininity-money incongruity hypothesis, which suggests that when the concepts of femininity and money are both cognitively activated, money will become a liability for women, causing decrements in cognitive functioning. We first probed the role of gender identity and benevolent sexism beliefs in women’s endorsement of money- gender stereotypes. In two subsequent experiments, we tested the hypothesis that simultaneously activating money and femininity would lead to decrements in cognitive functioning. Converging results across studies suggest that money is incompatible with the stereotypic female gender identity, and this incongruity has detrimental cognitive costs for women as they navigate gender roles. Implications of societal challenges imposed on women by gender stereotypes regarding money matters at work and in relationship contexts and proposed interventions are discussed. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684317718505.

KW - Cognition

KW - Gender roles

KW - Money

KW - Sexism

KW - Stroop

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044094796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044094796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0361684317718505

DO - 10.1177/0361684317718505

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044094796

VL - 41

SP - 407

EP - 419

JO - Psychology of Women Quarterly

JF - Psychology of Women Quarterly

SN - 0361-6843

IS - 4

ER -