The feasibility of restoring previously drained wetlands to reduce flood damage

Steven D. Shultz, Jay A. Leitch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The economic feasibility of restoring previously drained wetlands to reduce flood damage was evaluated in North Dakota's Maple River Watershed, a sub-watershed of the Red River Valley of the North. Benefit-cost ratios ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 were not adequate to make simple wetland restoration - based on plugging existing drains, restoration with outlet control devices, or complete restoration intended to provide a full range of wetland-based environmental services - economically feasible over a 20-year future period. Peak flood stage and flood damage would need to be reduced by 3.3% to 8% in order for wetland restoration options to break-even and the inclusion of likely non-flood related wetland benefits did not improve feasibility. It is not recommended that public funds be used for extensive wetland restoration projects throughout Maple River Watershed or across large areas of the Red River Valley for the purpose of reducing flood damage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-29
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Soil and Water Conservation
Volume58
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

flood damage
wetlands
wetland
rivers
Acer
watershed
river
valleys
valley
economic feasibility
ecosystem services
drain
restoration
economics

Keywords

  • Flooding
  • Red River Valley
  • Wetland restoration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

The feasibility of restoring previously drained wetlands to reduce flood damage. / Shultz, Steven D.; Leitch, Jay A.

In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 21-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{628aefa721de4a0383c5d384766151ad,
title = "The feasibility of restoring previously drained wetlands to reduce flood damage",
abstract = "The economic feasibility of restoring previously drained wetlands to reduce flood damage was evaluated in North Dakota's Maple River Watershed, a sub-watershed of the Red River Valley of the North. Benefit-cost ratios ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 were not adequate to make simple wetland restoration - based on plugging existing drains, restoration with outlet control devices, or complete restoration intended to provide a full range of wetland-based environmental services - economically feasible over a 20-year future period. Peak flood stage and flood damage would need to be reduced by 3.3{\%} to 8{\%} in order for wetland restoration options to break-even and the inclusion of likely non-flood related wetland benefits did not improve feasibility. It is not recommended that public funds be used for extensive wetland restoration projects throughout Maple River Watershed or across large areas of the Red River Valley for the purpose of reducing flood damage.",
keywords = "Flooding, Red River Valley, Wetland restoration",
author = "Shultz, {Steven D.} and Leitch, {Jay A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "21--29",
journal = "Journal of Soils and Water Conservation",
issn = "0022-4561",
publisher = "Soil Conservation Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The feasibility of restoring previously drained wetlands to reduce flood damage

AU - Shultz, Steven D.

AU - Leitch, Jay A.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - The economic feasibility of restoring previously drained wetlands to reduce flood damage was evaluated in North Dakota's Maple River Watershed, a sub-watershed of the Red River Valley of the North. Benefit-cost ratios ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 were not adequate to make simple wetland restoration - based on plugging existing drains, restoration with outlet control devices, or complete restoration intended to provide a full range of wetland-based environmental services - economically feasible over a 20-year future period. Peak flood stage and flood damage would need to be reduced by 3.3% to 8% in order for wetland restoration options to break-even and the inclusion of likely non-flood related wetland benefits did not improve feasibility. It is not recommended that public funds be used for extensive wetland restoration projects throughout Maple River Watershed or across large areas of the Red River Valley for the purpose of reducing flood damage.

AB - The economic feasibility of restoring previously drained wetlands to reduce flood damage was evaluated in North Dakota's Maple River Watershed, a sub-watershed of the Red River Valley of the North. Benefit-cost ratios ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 were not adequate to make simple wetland restoration - based on plugging existing drains, restoration with outlet control devices, or complete restoration intended to provide a full range of wetland-based environmental services - economically feasible over a 20-year future period. Peak flood stage and flood damage would need to be reduced by 3.3% to 8% in order for wetland restoration options to break-even and the inclusion of likely non-flood related wetland benefits did not improve feasibility. It is not recommended that public funds be used for extensive wetland restoration projects throughout Maple River Watershed or across large areas of the Red River Valley for the purpose of reducing flood damage.

KW - Flooding

KW - Red River Valley

KW - Wetland restoration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037281143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037281143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037281143

VL - 58

SP - 21

EP - 29

JO - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

JF - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

SN - 0022-4561

IS - 1

ER -