The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature

Arthur L. Greil, Kathleen Slauson-Blevins, Julia McQuillan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

295 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

About 10 years ago Greil published a review and critique of the literature on the socio-psychological impact of infertility. He found at the time that most scholars treated infertility as a medical condition with psychological consequences rather than as a socially constructed reality. This article examines research published since the last review. More studies now place infertility within larger social contexts and social scientific frameworks although clinical emphases persist. Methodological problems remain but important improvements are also evident. We identify two vigorous research traditions in the social scientific study of infertility. One tradition uses primarily quantitative techniques to study clinic patients in order to improve service delivery and to assess the need for psychological counselling. The other tradition uses primarily qualitative research to capture the experiences of infertile people in a sociocultural context. We conclude that more attention is now being paid to the ways in which the experience of infertility is shaped by social context. We call for continued progress in the development of a distinctly sociological approach to infertility and for the continued integration of the two research traditions identified here.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)140-162
Number of pages23
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Infertility
experience
psychological counseling
Psychology
psychological consequences
Research
qualitative research
Qualitative Research
literature
Counseling

Keywords

  • Illness experience
  • Infertility
  • Literature review
  • Psychological distress
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The experience of infertility : A review of recent literature. / Greil, Arthur L.; Slauson-Blevins, Kathleen; McQuillan, Julia.

In: Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 140-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Greil, Arthur L. ; Slauson-Blevins, Kathleen ; McQuillan, Julia. / The experience of infertility : A review of recent literature. In: Sociology of Health and Illness. 2010 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 140-162.
@article{51b6f86c32c34ac09cb6d2b6f648ef7b,
title = "The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature",
abstract = "About 10 years ago Greil published a review and critique of the literature on the socio-psychological impact of infertility. He found at the time that most scholars treated infertility as a medical condition with psychological consequences rather than as a socially constructed reality. This article examines research published since the last review. More studies now place infertility within larger social contexts and social scientific frameworks although clinical emphases persist. Methodological problems remain but important improvements are also evident. We identify two vigorous research traditions in the social scientific study of infertility. One tradition uses primarily quantitative techniques to study clinic patients in order to improve service delivery and to assess the need for psychological counselling. The other tradition uses primarily qualitative research to capture the experiences of infertile people in a sociocultural context. We conclude that more attention is now being paid to the ways in which the experience of infertility is shaped by social context. We call for continued progress in the development of a distinctly sociological approach to infertility and for the continued integration of the two research traditions identified here.",
keywords = "Illness experience, Infertility, Literature review, Psychological distress, Treatment",
author = "Greil, {Arthur L.} and Kathleen Slauson-Blevins and Julia McQuillan",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "140--162",
journal = "Sociology of Health and Illness",
issn = "0141-9889",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The experience of infertility

T2 - A review of recent literature

AU - Greil, Arthur L.

AU - Slauson-Blevins, Kathleen

AU - McQuillan, Julia

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - About 10 years ago Greil published a review and critique of the literature on the socio-psychological impact of infertility. He found at the time that most scholars treated infertility as a medical condition with psychological consequences rather than as a socially constructed reality. This article examines research published since the last review. More studies now place infertility within larger social contexts and social scientific frameworks although clinical emphases persist. Methodological problems remain but important improvements are also evident. We identify two vigorous research traditions in the social scientific study of infertility. One tradition uses primarily quantitative techniques to study clinic patients in order to improve service delivery and to assess the need for psychological counselling. The other tradition uses primarily qualitative research to capture the experiences of infertile people in a sociocultural context. We conclude that more attention is now being paid to the ways in which the experience of infertility is shaped by social context. We call for continued progress in the development of a distinctly sociological approach to infertility and for the continued integration of the two research traditions identified here.

AB - About 10 years ago Greil published a review and critique of the literature on the socio-psychological impact of infertility. He found at the time that most scholars treated infertility as a medical condition with psychological consequences rather than as a socially constructed reality. This article examines research published since the last review. More studies now place infertility within larger social contexts and social scientific frameworks although clinical emphases persist. Methodological problems remain but important improvements are also evident. We identify two vigorous research traditions in the social scientific study of infertility. One tradition uses primarily quantitative techniques to study clinic patients in order to improve service delivery and to assess the need for psychological counselling. The other tradition uses primarily qualitative research to capture the experiences of infertile people in a sociocultural context. We conclude that more attention is now being paid to the ways in which the experience of infertility is shaped by social context. We call for continued progress in the development of a distinctly sociological approach to infertility and for the continued integration of the two research traditions identified here.

KW - Illness experience

KW - Infertility

KW - Literature review

KW - Psychological distress

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955906966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955906966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 20003036

AN - SCOPUS:77955906966

VL - 32

SP - 140

EP - 162

JO - Sociology of Health and Illness

JF - Sociology of Health and Illness

SN - 0141-9889

IS - 1

ER -