The evaluation of culpability for rape: A model of legal decision making

Richard L. Wiener, Stephen J. Vodanovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An analogy was borrowed from the law to develop a legal model of the attribution of responsibility for rape. According to the model, judgments of physical and psychological causality of an alleged rapist are combined into overall evaluations of attacker responsibility. An experimental test of the model was conducted with college students. Results showed that witness identification information influenced judgments of physical causality (i.e., extent to which the situation was perceived as rape), and information about the relationship between the alleged attacker and victim influenced judgments of psychological causality (i.e., intention to rape). Judgments of physical and psychological causality interacted significantly with overall attributions of attacker responsibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-500
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied
Volume120
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1986

Fingerprint

rape
causality
Causality
Decision Making
decision making
Psychology
evaluation
responsibility
attribution
witness
Theoretical Models
Students
Law
Evaluation
Decision making
Rape
Psychological
Responsibility
student
Attribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The evaluation of culpability for rape : A model of legal decision making. / Wiener, Richard L.; Vodanovich, Stephen J.

In: Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, Vol. 120, No. 5, 09.1986, p. 489-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a4a4f44f2a684fa6a1ec3281c7496fe2,
title = "The evaluation of culpability for rape: A model of legal decision making",
abstract = "An analogy was borrowed from the law to develop a legal model of the attribution of responsibility for rape. According to the model, judgments of physical and psychological causality of an alleged rapist are combined into overall evaluations of attacker responsibility. An experimental test of the model was conducted with college students. Results showed that witness identification information influenced judgments of physical causality (i.e., extent to which the situation was perceived as rape), and information about the relationship between the alleged attacker and victim influenced judgments of psychological causality (i.e., intention to rape). Judgments of physical and psychological causality interacted significantly with overall attributions of attacker responsibility.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L.} and Vodanovich, {Stephen J.}",
year = "1986",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/00223980.1986.9915481",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "489--500",
journal = "Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied",
issn = "0022-3980",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of culpability for rape

T2 - A model of legal decision making

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Vodanovich, Stephen J.

PY - 1986/9

Y1 - 1986/9

N2 - An analogy was borrowed from the law to develop a legal model of the attribution of responsibility for rape. According to the model, judgments of physical and psychological causality of an alleged rapist are combined into overall evaluations of attacker responsibility. An experimental test of the model was conducted with college students. Results showed that witness identification information influenced judgments of physical causality (i.e., extent to which the situation was perceived as rape), and information about the relationship between the alleged attacker and victim influenced judgments of psychological causality (i.e., intention to rape). Judgments of physical and psychological causality interacted significantly with overall attributions of attacker responsibility.

AB - An analogy was borrowed from the law to develop a legal model of the attribution of responsibility for rape. According to the model, judgments of physical and psychological causality of an alleged rapist are combined into overall evaluations of attacker responsibility. An experimental test of the model was conducted with college students. Results showed that witness identification information influenced judgments of physical causality (i.e., extent to which the situation was perceived as rape), and information about the relationship between the alleged attacker and victim influenced judgments of psychological causality (i.e., intention to rape). Judgments of physical and psychological causality interacted significantly with overall attributions of attacker responsibility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84935001427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84935001427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00223980.1986.9915481

DO - 10.1080/00223980.1986.9915481

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84935001427

VL - 120

SP - 489

EP - 500

JO - Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

JF - Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

SN - 0022-3980

IS - 5

ER -