The elderly trauma patient: An investment for the future?

Mark A. Newell, Michael F. Rotondo, Eric A. Toschlog, Brett H. Waibel, Scott G. Sagraves, Paul J. Schenarts, Michael R. Bard, Claudia E. Goettler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cost of care in elderly (ELD) trauma patients is high compared with younger patients, but the association between age and reimbursement relative to cost is less clear. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between total costs (TC) and reimbursement in young (YNG) and ELD trauma patients. METHODS: The National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons was queried for patients admitted to a level I trauma center between January 2002 and December 2004. YNG patients (18-64 years) were compared with ELD patients (≥65 years) for mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, and outcome variables. Data obtained from the hospital cost accounting system included TC, total payment, and net margin (P-L). Virtually, all patients were reimbursed based on the fixed diagnostic-related group payment. RESULTS: There were 641 ELD and 3,470 YNG patients included in the study. ELD patients were more commonly injured via a blunt mechanism than the YNG patients (97% vs. 83%; p < 0.001). The ELD were more severely injured (Injury Severity Score 14.9 ± 10.8 vs. 13.3 ± 10.9), developed more complications (54% vs. 34%), and died more frequently (17% vs. 4.7%; all p < 0.05). TC for the ELD were significantly higher than the YNG ($20,788.92 ± $28,305.54 vs. $19,161.11 ± $30,441.56; p = 0.02). Total payment ($20,049.75 ± $29,754.52 vs. $16,766.14 ± $31,169.15) and P-L (-$739.18 ± $17,207.84 vs. -$2,294.98 ± $22,309.51; both p < 0.05) were significantly better for the ELD cohort. However, a financial loss was realized for all patients with trauma. CONCLUSION: When compared with YNG trauma patients, reimbursement in the ELD appears favorable. However, compensation via diagnostic-related group payment fails to cover costs even in the ELD. Reimbursement for all patients with trauma is suboptimal and needs to be improved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-340
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume67
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2009

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Costs and Cost Analysis
Injury Severity Score
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Hospital Costs
Trauma Centers
Compensation and Redress
Registries

Keywords

  • Diagnostic-related group
  • Elderly
  • Reimbursement
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Newell, M. A., Rotondo, M. F., Toschlog, E. A., Waibel, B. H., Sagraves, S. G., Schenarts, P. J., ... Goettler, C. E. (2009). The elderly trauma patient: An investment for the future? Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 67(2), 337-340. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181add08b

The elderly trauma patient : An investment for the future? / Newell, Mark A.; Rotondo, Michael F.; Toschlog, Eric A.; Waibel, Brett H.; Sagraves, Scott G.; Schenarts, Paul J.; Bard, Michael R.; Goettler, Claudia E.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 67, No. 2, 01.08.2009, p. 337-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newell, MA, Rotondo, MF, Toschlog, EA, Waibel, BH, Sagraves, SG, Schenarts, PJ, Bard, MR & Goettler, CE 2009, 'The elderly trauma patient: An investment for the future?', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 337-340. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181add08b
Newell, Mark A. ; Rotondo, Michael F. ; Toschlog, Eric A. ; Waibel, Brett H. ; Sagraves, Scott G. ; Schenarts, Paul J. ; Bard, Michael R. ; Goettler, Claudia E. / The elderly trauma patient : An investment for the future?. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2009 ; Vol. 67, No. 2. pp. 337-340.
@article{13f8a395cb3144efaed34a26043a0b80,
title = "The elderly trauma patient: An investment for the future?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The cost of care in elderly (ELD) trauma patients is high compared with younger patients, but the association between age and reimbursement relative to cost is less clear. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between total costs (TC) and reimbursement in young (YNG) and ELD trauma patients. METHODS: The National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons was queried for patients admitted to a level I trauma center between January 2002 and December 2004. YNG patients (18-64 years) were compared with ELD patients (≥65 years) for mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, and outcome variables. Data obtained from the hospital cost accounting system included TC, total payment, and net margin (P-L). Virtually, all patients were reimbursed based on the fixed diagnostic-related group payment. RESULTS: There were 641 ELD and 3,470 YNG patients included in the study. ELD patients were more commonly injured via a blunt mechanism than the YNG patients (97{\%} vs. 83{\%}; p < 0.001). The ELD were more severely injured (Injury Severity Score 14.9 ± 10.8 vs. 13.3 ± 10.9), developed more complications (54{\%} vs. 34{\%}), and died more frequently (17{\%} vs. 4.7{\%}; all p < 0.05). TC for the ELD were significantly higher than the YNG ($20,788.92 ± $28,305.54 vs. $19,161.11 ± $30,441.56; p = 0.02). Total payment ($20,049.75 ± $29,754.52 vs. $16,766.14 ± $31,169.15) and P-L (-$739.18 ± $17,207.84 vs. -$2,294.98 ± $22,309.51; both p < 0.05) were significantly better for the ELD cohort. However, a financial loss was realized for all patients with trauma. CONCLUSION: When compared with YNG trauma patients, reimbursement in the ELD appears favorable. However, compensation via diagnostic-related group payment fails to cover costs even in the ELD. Reimbursement for all patients with trauma is suboptimal and needs to be improved.",
keywords = "Diagnostic-related group, Elderly, Reimbursement, Trauma",
author = "Newell, {Mark A.} and Rotondo, {Michael F.} and Toschlog, {Eric A.} and Waibel, {Brett H.} and Sagraves, {Scott G.} and Schenarts, {Paul J.} and Bard, {Michael R.} and Goettler, {Claudia E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3181add08b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "337--340",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The elderly trauma patient

T2 - An investment for the future?

AU - Newell, Mark A.

AU - Rotondo, Michael F.

AU - Toschlog, Eric A.

AU - Waibel, Brett H.

AU - Sagraves, Scott G.

AU - Schenarts, Paul J.

AU - Bard, Michael R.

AU - Goettler, Claudia E.

PY - 2009/8/1

Y1 - 2009/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The cost of care in elderly (ELD) trauma patients is high compared with younger patients, but the association between age and reimbursement relative to cost is less clear. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between total costs (TC) and reimbursement in young (YNG) and ELD trauma patients. METHODS: The National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons was queried for patients admitted to a level I trauma center between January 2002 and December 2004. YNG patients (18-64 years) were compared with ELD patients (≥65 years) for mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, and outcome variables. Data obtained from the hospital cost accounting system included TC, total payment, and net margin (P-L). Virtually, all patients were reimbursed based on the fixed diagnostic-related group payment. RESULTS: There were 641 ELD and 3,470 YNG patients included in the study. ELD patients were more commonly injured via a blunt mechanism than the YNG patients (97% vs. 83%; p < 0.001). The ELD were more severely injured (Injury Severity Score 14.9 ± 10.8 vs. 13.3 ± 10.9), developed more complications (54% vs. 34%), and died more frequently (17% vs. 4.7%; all p < 0.05). TC for the ELD were significantly higher than the YNG ($20,788.92 ± $28,305.54 vs. $19,161.11 ± $30,441.56; p = 0.02). Total payment ($20,049.75 ± $29,754.52 vs. $16,766.14 ± $31,169.15) and P-L (-$739.18 ± $17,207.84 vs. -$2,294.98 ± $22,309.51; both p < 0.05) were significantly better for the ELD cohort. However, a financial loss was realized for all patients with trauma. CONCLUSION: When compared with YNG trauma patients, reimbursement in the ELD appears favorable. However, compensation via diagnostic-related group payment fails to cover costs even in the ELD. Reimbursement for all patients with trauma is suboptimal and needs to be improved.

AB - BACKGROUND: The cost of care in elderly (ELD) trauma patients is high compared with younger patients, but the association between age and reimbursement relative to cost is less clear. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between total costs (TC) and reimbursement in young (YNG) and ELD trauma patients. METHODS: The National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons was queried for patients admitted to a level I trauma center between January 2002 and December 2004. YNG patients (18-64 years) were compared with ELD patients (≥65 years) for mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, and outcome variables. Data obtained from the hospital cost accounting system included TC, total payment, and net margin (P-L). Virtually, all patients were reimbursed based on the fixed diagnostic-related group payment. RESULTS: There were 641 ELD and 3,470 YNG patients included in the study. ELD patients were more commonly injured via a blunt mechanism than the YNG patients (97% vs. 83%; p < 0.001). The ELD were more severely injured (Injury Severity Score 14.9 ± 10.8 vs. 13.3 ± 10.9), developed more complications (54% vs. 34%), and died more frequently (17% vs. 4.7%; all p < 0.05). TC for the ELD were significantly higher than the YNG ($20,788.92 ± $28,305.54 vs. $19,161.11 ± $30,441.56; p = 0.02). Total payment ($20,049.75 ± $29,754.52 vs. $16,766.14 ± $31,169.15) and P-L (-$739.18 ± $17,207.84 vs. -$2,294.98 ± $22,309.51; both p < 0.05) were significantly better for the ELD cohort. However, a financial loss was realized for all patients with trauma. CONCLUSION: When compared with YNG trauma patients, reimbursement in the ELD appears favorable. However, compensation via diagnostic-related group payment fails to cover costs even in the ELD. Reimbursement for all patients with trauma is suboptimal and needs to be improved.

KW - Diagnostic-related group

KW - Elderly

KW - Reimbursement

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69349099931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69349099931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181add08b

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181add08b

M3 - Article

C2 - 19667887

AN - SCOPUS:69349099931

VL - 67

SP - 337

EP - 340

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 2

ER -