The efficacy of the use of implicature and actor portrayal labels by non-profits in anti-smoking print advertisements

Kevin J. Shanahan, Christopher D. Hopkins, Les Carlson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Differences in emotional response and overall attitude toward the ad, perceived social responsibility of the sponsor and willingness to donate are tested across 4 types of print advertisements sponsored by a nonprofit. The 4 treatments for anti-smoking ads include: truth in advertising, implicature, actor portrayal disclosure and deceptive advertising. The use of real victims garners the strongest emotional response, most positive attitude towards the advertisement, strongest perceived social responsibility and highest proclivity to donate to the nonprofit. The use of an actor portrayal label, while deemed to be socially responsible, significantly reduces ad effectiveness and willingness to donate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-78
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Efficacy
Social responsibility
Willingness
Emotional response
Smoking
Attitude toward the ad
Disclosure
Sponsor
False Advertising

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Cite this

The efficacy of the use of implicature and actor portrayal labels by non-profits in anti-smoking print advertisements. / Shanahan, Kevin J.; Hopkins, Christopher D.; Carlson, Les.

In: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.01.2008, p. 65-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f6172ceaf8e45c7ac01aae92e2a9372,
title = "The efficacy of the use of implicature and actor portrayal labels by non-profits in anti-smoking print advertisements",
abstract = "Differences in emotional response and overall attitude toward the ad, perceived social responsibility of the sponsor and willingness to donate are tested across 4 types of print advertisements sponsored by a nonprofit. The 4 treatments for anti-smoking ads include: truth in advertising, implicature, actor portrayal disclosure and deceptive advertising. The use of real victims garners the strongest emotional response, most positive attitude towards the advertisement, strongest perceived social responsibility and highest proclivity to donate to the nonprofit. The use of an actor portrayal label, while deemed to be socially responsible, significantly reduces ad effectiveness and willingness to donate.",
author = "Shanahan, {Kevin J.} and Hopkins, {Christopher D.} and Les Carlson",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10641734.2008.10505248",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "65--78",
journal = "Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising",
issn = "1064-1734",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The efficacy of the use of implicature and actor portrayal labels by non-profits in anti-smoking print advertisements

AU - Shanahan, Kevin J.

AU - Hopkins, Christopher D.

AU - Carlson, Les

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Differences in emotional response and overall attitude toward the ad, perceived social responsibility of the sponsor and willingness to donate are tested across 4 types of print advertisements sponsored by a nonprofit. The 4 treatments for anti-smoking ads include: truth in advertising, implicature, actor portrayal disclosure and deceptive advertising. The use of real victims garners the strongest emotional response, most positive attitude towards the advertisement, strongest perceived social responsibility and highest proclivity to donate to the nonprofit. The use of an actor portrayal label, while deemed to be socially responsible, significantly reduces ad effectiveness and willingness to donate.

AB - Differences in emotional response and overall attitude toward the ad, perceived social responsibility of the sponsor and willingness to donate are tested across 4 types of print advertisements sponsored by a nonprofit. The 4 treatments for anti-smoking ads include: truth in advertising, implicature, actor portrayal disclosure and deceptive advertising. The use of real victims garners the strongest emotional response, most positive attitude towards the advertisement, strongest perceived social responsibility and highest proclivity to donate to the nonprofit. The use of an actor portrayal label, while deemed to be socially responsible, significantly reduces ad effectiveness and willingness to donate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964664769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964664769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10641734.2008.10505248

DO - 10.1080/10641734.2008.10505248

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964664769

VL - 30

SP - 65

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising

JF - Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising

SN - 1064-1734

IS - 2

ER -