The effects of victim's substance use and relationship closeness on mock jurors' judgments in an acquaintance rape case

Ashley A. Wenger, Brian H Bornstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that jurors perceive a female victim who is drunk at the time when she is sexually assaulted as less credible and more deserving of such punishment than a sober victim. In this experiment, we investigated the effect of an alleged acquaintance rape victim's type of substance use and closeness of relationship with the defendant on the judgments of 152 student mock jurors. Participants read a case summary and answered a series of questions about their impressions of the actors and actions involved in the case. Participants perceived a victim who was sober at the time of the incident as more credible than a victim who was intoxicated due to illegal substance use (alcohol or LSD), and convictions were also most likely when the victim was sober. Women perceived the victim as more credible than men did. Higher victim credibility judgments were associated with less rape myth acceptance (RMA) on the part of participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)547-555
Number of pages9
JournalSex Roles
Volume54
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006

Fingerprint

Rape
rape
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide
Punishment
Alcohols
Students
Research
credibility
penalty
myth
incident
acceptance
alcohol
experiment

Keywords

  • Juries
  • Rape
  • Substance use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The effects of victim's substance use and relationship closeness on mock jurors' judgments in an acquaintance rape case. / Wenger, Ashley A.; Bornstein, Brian H.

In: Sex Roles, Vol. 54, No. 7-8, 01.04.2006, p. 547-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ef3245503ab4921bf2fe26d6f74b105,
title = "The effects of victim's substance use and relationship closeness on mock jurors' judgments in an acquaintance rape case",
abstract = "Previous research has demonstrated that jurors perceive a female victim who is drunk at the time when she is sexually assaulted as less credible and more deserving of such punishment than a sober victim. In this experiment, we investigated the effect of an alleged acquaintance rape victim's type of substance use and closeness of relationship with the defendant on the judgments of 152 student mock jurors. Participants read a case summary and answered a series of questions about their impressions of the actors and actions involved in the case. Participants perceived a victim who was sober at the time of the incident as more credible than a victim who was intoxicated due to illegal substance use (alcohol or LSD), and convictions were also most likely when the victim was sober. Women perceived the victim as more credible than men did. Higher victim credibility judgments were associated with less rape myth acceptance (RMA) on the part of participants.",
keywords = "Juries, Rape, Substance use",
author = "Wenger, {Ashley A.} and Bornstein, {Brian H}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11199-006-9014-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "547--555",
journal = "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research",
issn = "0360-0025",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of victim's substance use and relationship closeness on mock jurors' judgments in an acquaintance rape case

AU - Wenger, Ashley A.

AU - Bornstein, Brian H

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - Previous research has demonstrated that jurors perceive a female victim who is drunk at the time when she is sexually assaulted as less credible and more deserving of such punishment than a sober victim. In this experiment, we investigated the effect of an alleged acquaintance rape victim's type of substance use and closeness of relationship with the defendant on the judgments of 152 student mock jurors. Participants read a case summary and answered a series of questions about their impressions of the actors and actions involved in the case. Participants perceived a victim who was sober at the time of the incident as more credible than a victim who was intoxicated due to illegal substance use (alcohol or LSD), and convictions were also most likely when the victim was sober. Women perceived the victim as more credible than men did. Higher victim credibility judgments were associated with less rape myth acceptance (RMA) on the part of participants.

AB - Previous research has demonstrated that jurors perceive a female victim who is drunk at the time when she is sexually assaulted as less credible and more deserving of such punishment than a sober victim. In this experiment, we investigated the effect of an alleged acquaintance rape victim's type of substance use and closeness of relationship with the defendant on the judgments of 152 student mock jurors. Participants read a case summary and answered a series of questions about their impressions of the actors and actions involved in the case. Participants perceived a victim who was sober at the time of the incident as more credible than a victim who was intoxicated due to illegal substance use (alcohol or LSD), and convictions were also most likely when the victim was sober. Women perceived the victim as more credible than men did. Higher victim credibility judgments were associated with less rape myth acceptance (RMA) on the part of participants.

KW - Juries

KW - Rape

KW - Substance use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751007551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751007551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11199-006-9014-2

DO - 10.1007/s11199-006-9014-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33751007551

VL - 54

SP - 547

EP - 555

JO - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

JF - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

SN - 0360-0025

IS - 7-8

ER -