The effects of response cost in the treatment of aberrant behavior maintained by negative reinforcement

Kris M. Keeney, Wayne W. Fisher, John D. Adelinis, David A. Wilder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Positive reinforcement contingencies can sometimes be used to decrease problem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement (e.g., escape). In the current study, we evaluated the extent to which response cost (i.e., contingent removal of a preferred stimulus) would compete with the negative reinforcer maintaining destructive behavior. The response cost contingency reduced destructive behavior by 87% from baseline levels even though the negative reinforcement contingency (i.e., escape) remained in place.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-258
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

reinforcement
Health Care Costs
contingency
costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
stimulus
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Contingency
Reinforcement
Costs
Problem Behavior
Stimulus
Contingent
Behavior Problems

Keywords

  • Destructive behavior
  • Functional analysis
  • Negative reinforcement
  • Response cost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The effects of response cost in the treatment of aberrant behavior maintained by negative reinforcement. / Keeney, Kris M.; Fisher, Wayne W.; Adelinis, John D.; Wilder, David A.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.01.2000, p. 255-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e785742fb4d443e89c92507cf30a7746,
title = "The effects of response cost in the treatment of aberrant behavior maintained by negative reinforcement",
abstract = "Positive reinforcement contingencies can sometimes be used to decrease problem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement (e.g., escape). In the current study, we evaluated the extent to which response cost (i.e., contingent removal of a preferred stimulus) would compete with the negative reinforcer maintaining destructive behavior. The response cost contingency reduced destructive behavior by 87{\%} from baseline levels even though the negative reinforcement contingency (i.e., escape) remained in place.",
keywords = "Destructive behavior, Functional analysis, Negative reinforcement, Response cost",
author = "Keeney, {Kris M.} and Fisher, {Wayne W.} and Adelinis, {John D.} and Wilder, {David A.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.2000.33-255",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "255--258",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of response cost in the treatment of aberrant behavior maintained by negative reinforcement

AU - Keeney, Kris M.

AU - Fisher, Wayne W.

AU - Adelinis, John D.

AU - Wilder, David A.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Positive reinforcement contingencies can sometimes be used to decrease problem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement (e.g., escape). In the current study, we evaluated the extent to which response cost (i.e., contingent removal of a preferred stimulus) would compete with the negative reinforcer maintaining destructive behavior. The response cost contingency reduced destructive behavior by 87% from baseline levels even though the negative reinforcement contingency (i.e., escape) remained in place.

AB - Positive reinforcement contingencies can sometimes be used to decrease problem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement (e.g., escape). In the current study, we evaluated the extent to which response cost (i.e., contingent removal of a preferred stimulus) would compete with the negative reinforcer maintaining destructive behavior. The response cost contingency reduced destructive behavior by 87% from baseline levels even though the negative reinforcement contingency (i.e., escape) remained in place.

KW - Destructive behavior

KW - Functional analysis

KW - Negative reinforcement

KW - Response cost

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034200431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034200431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-255

DO - 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-255

M3 - Article

C2 - 10885535

AN - SCOPUS:0034200431

VL - 33

SP - 255

EP - 258

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 2

ER -