The effects of proficiency and bias on residents' interpretation of the microscopic urinalysis

Stephen D. Flach, Gay J. Canaris, Thomas Gerald Tape, Kathryn M. Huntley, Robert Swift Wigton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. This study aims to determine whether residents are influenced by clinical information when interpreting microscopic urinalysis (UA) and estimating the probability of a urinary tract infection (UTI), and to determine the accuracy and reliability of UA readings. Design. Residents estimated the UA white blood cell count and the probability of a UTI in vignettes using a fractional factorial design, varying symptoms, gender, and the white blood cell count on preprepared urine slides. Results. Individual-level results indicated a clinical information bias and poor accuracy. Seventeen of 38 residents increased the white blood cell count in response to female gender; 14 increased the white blood cell count in response to UTI symptoms. Forty-nine percent of the readings were inaccurate; agreement ranged from 50% to 67% for white and red blood cells and bacteria. Conclusion. Many residents gave inaccurate UA readings, and many readings varied with clinical information. A significant portion of residents needs assistance in objectively and accurately interpreting the UA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)318-325
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Urinalysis
Leukocyte Count
Reading
Urinary Tract Infections
Leukocytes
Erythrocytes
Urine
Bacteria

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Clinical information bias
  • Microscopic urinalysis
  • Probability estimates
  • Residents
  • Urinary tract infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The effects of proficiency and bias on residents' interpretation of the microscopic urinalysis. / Flach, Stephen D.; Canaris, Gay J.; Tape, Thomas Gerald; Huntley, Kathryn M.; Wigton, Robert Swift.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.01.2002, p. 318-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{843ce2c641744b8d8fb4880c52da2e09,
title = "The effects of proficiency and bias on residents' interpretation of the microscopic urinalysis",
abstract = "Objective. This study aims to determine whether residents are influenced by clinical information when interpreting microscopic urinalysis (UA) and estimating the probability of a urinary tract infection (UTI), and to determine the accuracy and reliability of UA readings. Design. Residents estimated the UA white blood cell count and the probability of a UTI in vignettes using a fractional factorial design, varying symptoms, gender, and the white blood cell count on preprepared urine slides. Results. Individual-level results indicated a clinical information bias and poor accuracy. Seventeen of 38 residents increased the white blood cell count in response to female gender; 14 increased the white blood cell count in response to UTI symptoms. Forty-nine percent of the readings were inaccurate; agreement ranged from 50{\%} to 67{\%} for white and red blood cells and bacteria. Conclusion. Many residents gave inaccurate UA readings, and many readings varied with clinical information. A significant portion of residents needs assistance in objectively and accurately interpreting the UA.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Clinical information bias, Microscopic urinalysis, Probability estimates, Residents, Urinary tract infection",
author = "Flach, {Stephen D.} and Canaris, {Gay J.} and Tape, {Thomas Gerald} and Huntley, {Kathryn M.} and Wigton, {Robert Swift}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X0202200410",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "318--325",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of proficiency and bias on residents' interpretation of the microscopic urinalysis

AU - Flach, Stephen D.

AU - Canaris, Gay J.

AU - Tape, Thomas Gerald

AU - Huntley, Kathryn M.

AU - Wigton, Robert Swift

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Objective. This study aims to determine whether residents are influenced by clinical information when interpreting microscopic urinalysis (UA) and estimating the probability of a urinary tract infection (UTI), and to determine the accuracy and reliability of UA readings. Design. Residents estimated the UA white blood cell count and the probability of a UTI in vignettes using a fractional factorial design, varying symptoms, gender, and the white blood cell count on preprepared urine slides. Results. Individual-level results indicated a clinical information bias and poor accuracy. Seventeen of 38 residents increased the white blood cell count in response to female gender; 14 increased the white blood cell count in response to UTI symptoms. Forty-nine percent of the readings were inaccurate; agreement ranged from 50% to 67% for white and red blood cells and bacteria. Conclusion. Many residents gave inaccurate UA readings, and many readings varied with clinical information. A significant portion of residents needs assistance in objectively and accurately interpreting the UA.

AB - Objective. This study aims to determine whether residents are influenced by clinical information when interpreting microscopic urinalysis (UA) and estimating the probability of a urinary tract infection (UTI), and to determine the accuracy and reliability of UA readings. Design. Residents estimated the UA white blood cell count and the probability of a UTI in vignettes using a fractional factorial design, varying symptoms, gender, and the white blood cell count on preprepared urine slides. Results. Individual-level results indicated a clinical information bias and poor accuracy. Seventeen of 38 residents increased the white blood cell count in response to female gender; 14 increased the white blood cell count in response to UTI symptoms. Forty-nine percent of the readings were inaccurate; agreement ranged from 50% to 67% for white and red blood cells and bacteria. Conclusion. Many residents gave inaccurate UA readings, and many readings varied with clinical information. A significant portion of residents needs assistance in objectively and accurately interpreting the UA.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Clinical information bias

KW - Microscopic urinalysis

KW - Probability estimates

KW - Residents

KW - Urinary tract infection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047696357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047696357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X0202200410

DO - 10.1177/0272989X0202200410

M3 - Article

C2 - 12150597

VL - 22

SP - 318

EP - 325

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 4

ER -