The effects of different mesh generation methods on computational fluid dynamic analysis and power loss assessment in total cavopulmonary connection

Yutong Liu, Kerem Pekkan, S. Casey Jones, Ajit P. Yoganathan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The flow field and energetic efficiency of total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) models have been studied by both in vitro experiment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). All the previous CFD studies have employed the structured mesh generation method to create the TCPC simulation model. In this study, a realistic TCPC model with complete anatomical features was numerically simulated using both structured and unstructured mesh generation methods: The flow fields and energy losses were compared in these two meshes. Two different energy loss calculation methods, the control volume and viscous dissipation methods, were investigated. The energy losses were also compared to the in vitro experimental results. The results demonstrated that: (1) the flow fields in the structured model were qualitatively similar to the unstructured model; (2) more vortices were present in the structured model than in the unstructured model; (3) both models had the least energy loss when flow was equally distributed to the left and right pulmonary arteries, while high losses occurred for extreme pulmonary arterial flow splits; (4) the energy loss results calculated using the same method were significantly different for different meshes; and (5) the energy loss results calculated using different methods were significantly different for the same mesh.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)594-603
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
Volume126
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004

Fingerprint

Mesh generation
Hydrodynamics
Dynamic analysis
Computational fluid dynamics
Energy dissipation
Flow fields
Pulmonary Artery
Lung
Vortex flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

The effects of different mesh generation methods on computational fluid dynamic analysis and power loss assessment in total cavopulmonary connection. / Liu, Yutong; Pekkan, Kerem; Jones, S. Casey; Yoganathan, Ajit P.

In: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 5, 01.10.2004, p. 594-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da409238007d43929d6711a5dda3e338,
title = "The effects of different mesh generation methods on computational fluid dynamic analysis and power loss assessment in total cavopulmonary connection",
abstract = "The flow field and energetic efficiency of total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) models have been studied by both in vitro experiment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). All the previous CFD studies have employed the structured mesh generation method to create the TCPC simulation model. In this study, a realistic TCPC model with complete anatomical features was numerically simulated using both structured and unstructured mesh generation methods: The flow fields and energy losses were compared in these two meshes. Two different energy loss calculation methods, the control volume and viscous dissipation methods, were investigated. The energy losses were also compared to the in vitro experimental results. The results demonstrated that: (1) the flow fields in the structured model were qualitatively similar to the unstructured model; (2) more vortices were present in the structured model than in the unstructured model; (3) both models had the least energy loss when flow was equally distributed to the left and right pulmonary arteries, while high losses occurred for extreme pulmonary arterial flow splits; (4) the energy loss results calculated using the same method were significantly different for different meshes; and (5) the energy loss results calculated using different methods were significantly different for the same mesh.",
author = "Yutong Liu and Kerem Pekkan and Jones, {S. Casey} and Yoganathan, {Ajit P.}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.1800553",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "594--603",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanical Engineering",
issn = "0148-0731",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of different mesh generation methods on computational fluid dynamic analysis and power loss assessment in total cavopulmonary connection

AU - Liu, Yutong

AU - Pekkan, Kerem

AU - Jones, S. Casey

AU - Yoganathan, Ajit P.

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - The flow field and energetic efficiency of total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) models have been studied by both in vitro experiment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). All the previous CFD studies have employed the structured mesh generation method to create the TCPC simulation model. In this study, a realistic TCPC model with complete anatomical features was numerically simulated using both structured and unstructured mesh generation methods: The flow fields and energy losses were compared in these two meshes. Two different energy loss calculation methods, the control volume and viscous dissipation methods, were investigated. The energy losses were also compared to the in vitro experimental results. The results demonstrated that: (1) the flow fields in the structured model were qualitatively similar to the unstructured model; (2) more vortices were present in the structured model than in the unstructured model; (3) both models had the least energy loss when flow was equally distributed to the left and right pulmonary arteries, while high losses occurred for extreme pulmonary arterial flow splits; (4) the energy loss results calculated using the same method were significantly different for different meshes; and (5) the energy loss results calculated using different methods were significantly different for the same mesh.

AB - The flow field and energetic efficiency of total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) models have been studied by both in vitro experiment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). All the previous CFD studies have employed the structured mesh generation method to create the TCPC simulation model. In this study, a realistic TCPC model with complete anatomical features was numerically simulated using both structured and unstructured mesh generation methods: The flow fields and energy losses were compared in these two meshes. Two different energy loss calculation methods, the control volume and viscous dissipation methods, were investigated. The energy losses were also compared to the in vitro experimental results. The results demonstrated that: (1) the flow fields in the structured model were qualitatively similar to the unstructured model; (2) more vortices were present in the structured model than in the unstructured model; (3) both models had the least energy loss when flow was equally distributed to the left and right pulmonary arteries, while high losses occurred for extreme pulmonary arterial flow splits; (4) the energy loss results calculated using the same method were significantly different for different meshes; and (5) the energy loss results calculated using different methods were significantly different for the same mesh.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10944230387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10944230387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.1800553

DO - 10.1115/1.1800553

M3 - Article

C2 - 15648812

AN - SCOPUS:10944230387

VL - 126

SP - 594

EP - 603

JO - Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

JF - Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

SN - 0148-0731

IS - 5

ER -