The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-restraint and self-injurious behavior (SIB) are two responses that can sometimes be members of the same functional response class (i.e., maintained by the same contingency). In such cases, a single treatment should be effective for both responses. In this investigation, we examined the effects of providing attention (the presumed reinforcer) both noncontingently and contingent upon either SIB or self-restraint. Results were consistent with our hypothesis that both responses were maintained by attention and suggested that noncontingent reinforcement was a potentially effective treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-110
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Self-Injurious Behavior
Wounds and Injuries
reinforcement
contingency
Therapeutics
Restraint
Self-injury
Contingent
Reinforcement (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Noncontingent reinforcement
  • Self-injurious behavior
  • Self-restraint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint. / Derby, K. Mark; Fisher, Wayne W.; Piazza, Cathleen C.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 107-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{834fa48517784faf9632cc5ce0910877,
title = "The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint",
abstract = "Self-restraint and self-injurious behavior (SIB) are two responses that can sometimes be members of the same functional response class (i.e., maintained by the same contingency). In such cases, a single treatment should be effective for both responses. In this investigation, we examined the effects of providing attention (the presumed reinforcer) both noncontingently and contingent upon either SIB or self-restraint. Results were consistent with our hypothesis that both responses were maintained by attention and suggested that noncontingent reinforcement was a potentially effective treatment.",
keywords = "Noncontingent reinforcement, Self-injurious behavior, Self-restraint",
author = "Derby, {K. Mark} and Fisher, {Wayne W.} and Piazza, {Cathleen C.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.1996.29-107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "107--110",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint

AU - Derby, K. Mark

AU - Fisher, Wayne W.

AU - Piazza, Cathleen C.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Self-restraint and self-injurious behavior (SIB) are two responses that can sometimes be members of the same functional response class (i.e., maintained by the same contingency). In such cases, a single treatment should be effective for both responses. In this investigation, we examined the effects of providing attention (the presumed reinforcer) both noncontingently and contingent upon either SIB or self-restraint. Results were consistent with our hypothesis that both responses were maintained by attention and suggested that noncontingent reinforcement was a potentially effective treatment.

AB - Self-restraint and self-injurious behavior (SIB) are two responses that can sometimes be members of the same functional response class (i.e., maintained by the same contingency). In such cases, a single treatment should be effective for both responses. In this investigation, we examined the effects of providing attention (the presumed reinforcer) both noncontingently and contingent upon either SIB or self-restraint. Results were consistent with our hypothesis that both responses were maintained by attention and suggested that noncontingent reinforcement was a potentially effective treatment.

KW - Noncontingent reinforcement

KW - Self-injurious behavior

KW - Self-restraint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030093642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030093642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-107

DO - 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-107

M3 - Article

C2 - 8881350

AN - SCOPUS:0030093642

VL - 29

SP - 107

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 1

ER -