The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro

S. Srisawasdi, D. B. Boyer, J. W. Reinhardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect of removal of the dentinal smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro was evaluated using 3 restorative techniques: a composite resin with its dentin bonding agent, a composite based with glass-ionomer lining cement, and a glass-ionomer restorative cement. The agent used to remove the smear layer was a commerical 10% polyacrylic acid. Removal of the smear layer did not have any affect on microleakage of each of 3 types of restorations considered separately. The results favor removal of the smear layer only when a glass-ionomer linear is used under the composite restoration. The microleakage of the glass-ionomer restorations was greater than either the composite or composite based with glass-ionomer liner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)384-389
Number of pages6
JournalDental Materials
Volume4
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1988

Fingerprint

Smear Layer
Ionomers
Restoration
Glass Ionomer Cements
Glass
carbopol 940
Composite materials
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Cements
Composite Resins
Linings
Resins
In Vitro Techniques
glass ionomer
Acids

Keywords

  • composite
  • glass-ionomer cements
  • microleakage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro. / Srisawasdi, S.; Boyer, D. B.; Reinhardt, J. W.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 4, No. 6, 12.1988, p. 384-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{071f87d31f944eecafd6ea9c8f64befd,
title = "The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro",
abstract = "The effect of removal of the dentinal smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro was evaluated using 3 restorative techniques: a composite resin with its dentin bonding agent, a composite based with glass-ionomer lining cement, and a glass-ionomer restorative cement. The agent used to remove the smear layer was a commerical 10{\%} polyacrylic acid. Removal of the smear layer did not have any affect on microleakage of each of 3 types of restorations considered separately. The results favor removal of the smear layer only when a glass-ionomer linear is used under the composite restoration. The microleakage of the glass-ionomer restorations was greater than either the composite or composite based with glass-ionomer liner.",
keywords = "composite, glass-ionomer cements, microleakage",
author = "S. Srisawasdi and Boyer, {D. B.} and Reinhardt, {J. W.}",
year = "1988",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "384--389",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro

AU - Srisawasdi, S.

AU - Boyer, D. B.

AU - Reinhardt, J. W.

PY - 1988/12

Y1 - 1988/12

N2 - The effect of removal of the dentinal smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro was evaluated using 3 restorative techniques: a composite resin with its dentin bonding agent, a composite based with glass-ionomer lining cement, and a glass-ionomer restorative cement. The agent used to remove the smear layer was a commerical 10% polyacrylic acid. Removal of the smear layer did not have any affect on microleakage of each of 3 types of restorations considered separately. The results favor removal of the smear layer only when a glass-ionomer linear is used under the composite restoration. The microleakage of the glass-ionomer restorations was greater than either the composite or composite based with glass-ionomer liner.

AB - The effect of removal of the dentinal smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro was evaluated using 3 restorative techniques: a composite resin with its dentin bonding agent, a composite based with glass-ionomer lining cement, and a glass-ionomer restorative cement. The agent used to remove the smear layer was a commerical 10% polyacrylic acid. Removal of the smear layer did not have any affect on microleakage of each of 3 types of restorations considered separately. The results favor removal of the smear layer only when a glass-ionomer linear is used under the composite restoration. The microleakage of the glass-ionomer restorations was greater than either the composite or composite based with glass-ionomer liner.

KW - composite

KW - glass-ionomer cements

KW - microleakage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024150857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024150857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X

DO - 10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 3271709

AN - SCOPUS:0024150857

VL - 4

SP - 384

EP - 389

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 6

ER -