The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return

Michael D Dodd, Jay Pratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the finding that targets appearing at previously cued locations are more slowly responded to than targets appearing at previously uncued locations when a relatively long temporal interval occurs between the cue and target. This experiment was conducted to determine whether the magnitude of IOR is influenced by the type of preceding trial (cued or uncued) and/or the location of the cue/target on the previous trial. Although no effect of cue/target location is observed, there was a marked effect of previous trial type, as IOR was greater following an uncued trial relative to a cued trial. This effect was attributable to differences in the response time as a function of previous trial type: specifically, participants were faster to respond to cued and uncued trials when the previous trial type was identical.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-417
Number of pages7
JournalPsychological Research
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007

Fingerprint

Cues
Reaction Time
Inhibition (Psychology)
Inhibition of Return

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return. / Dodd, Michael D; Pratt, Jay.

In: Psychological Research, Vol. 71, No. 4, 01.07.2007, p. 411-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a58e677cbda94cf68404b98be206e8a0,
title = "The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return",
abstract = "Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the finding that targets appearing at previously cued locations are more slowly responded to than targets appearing at previously uncued locations when a relatively long temporal interval occurs between the cue and target. This experiment was conducted to determine whether the magnitude of IOR is influenced by the type of preceding trial (cued or uncued) and/or the location of the cue/target on the previous trial. Although no effect of cue/target location is observed, there was a marked effect of previous trial type, as IOR was greater following an uncued trial relative to a cued trial. This effect was attributable to differences in the response time as a function of previous trial type: specifically, participants were faster to respond to cued and uncued trials when the previous trial type was identical.",
author = "Dodd, {Michael D} and Jay Pratt",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00426-005-0028-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "411--417",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return

AU - Dodd, Michael D

AU - Pratt, Jay

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the finding that targets appearing at previously cued locations are more slowly responded to than targets appearing at previously uncued locations when a relatively long temporal interval occurs between the cue and target. This experiment was conducted to determine whether the magnitude of IOR is influenced by the type of preceding trial (cued or uncued) and/or the location of the cue/target on the previous trial. Although no effect of cue/target location is observed, there was a marked effect of previous trial type, as IOR was greater following an uncued trial relative to a cued trial. This effect was attributable to differences in the response time as a function of previous trial type: specifically, participants were faster to respond to cued and uncued trials when the previous trial type was identical.

AB - Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the finding that targets appearing at previously cued locations are more slowly responded to than targets appearing at previously uncued locations when a relatively long temporal interval occurs between the cue and target. This experiment was conducted to determine whether the magnitude of IOR is influenced by the type of preceding trial (cued or uncued) and/or the location of the cue/target on the previous trial. Although no effect of cue/target location is observed, there was a marked effect of previous trial type, as IOR was greater following an uncued trial relative to a cued trial. This effect was attributable to differences in the response time as a function of previous trial type: specifically, participants were faster to respond to cued and uncued trials when the previous trial type was identical.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250810409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250810409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00426-005-0028-0

DO - 10.1007/s00426-005-0028-0

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 411

EP - 417

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

IS - 4

ER -